Literature DB >> 14552583

The perception of breast cancers--a spatial frequency analysis of what differentiates missed from reported cancers.

Claudia Mello-Thoms1, Stanley M Dunn, Calvin F Nodine, Harold L Kundel.   

Abstract

The primary detector of breast cancer is the human eye. Radiologists read mammograms by mapping exogenous and endogenous factors, which are based on the image and observer, respectively, into observer-based decisions. These decisions rely on an internal schema that contains a representation of possible malignant and benign findings. Thus, to understand the hits and misses made by the radiologists, it is important to model the interactions between the measurable image-based elements contained in the mammogram and the decisions made. The image-based elements can be of two types, i.e., areas that attracted the visual attention of the radiologist, but did not yield a report, and areas where the radiologist indicated the presence of an abnormal finding. In this way, overt and covert decisions are made when reading a mammogram. In order to model this decision-making process, we use a system that is based upon the processing done by the human visual system, which decomposes the areas under scrutiny in elements of different sizes and orientations. In our system, this decomposition is done using wavelet packets (WPs). Nonlinear features are then extracted from the WP coefficients, and an artificial neural network is trained to recognize the patterns of decisions made by each radiologist. Afterwards, the system is used to predict how the radiologist will respond to visually selected areas in new mammogram cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14552583     DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2003.817784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  7 in total

1.  Spatial localization accuracy of radiologists in free-response studies: Inferring perceptual FROC curves from mark-rating data.

Authors:  Dev Chakraborty; Hong-Jun Yoon; Claudia Mello-Thoms
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Investigating the link between radiologists' gaze, diagnostic decision, and image content.

Authors:  Georgia Tourassi; Sophie Voisin; Vincent Paquit; Elizabeth Krupinski
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Visual search in breast imaging.

Authors:  Ziba Gandomkar; Claudia Mello-Thoms
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Can a Machine Learn from Radiologists' Visual Search Behaviour and Their Interpretation of Mammograms-a Deep-Learning Study.

Authors:  Suneeta Mall; Patrick C Brennan; Claudia Mello-Thoms
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Modeling visual search behavior of breast radiologists using a deep convolution neural network.

Authors:  Suneeta Mall; Patrick C Brennan; Claudia Mello-Thoms
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-08-11

Review 6.  The Holistic Processing Account of Visual Expertise in Medical Image Perception: A Review.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Eyal M Reingold
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-09-28

7.  Understanding Cardiology Practitioners' Interpretations of Electrocardiograms: An Eye-Tracking Study.

Authors:  Mohammed Tahri Sqalli; Dena Al-Thani; Mohamed B Elshazly; Mohammed Al-Hijji; Alaa Alahmadi; Yahya Sqalli Houssaini
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2022-02-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.