| Literature DB >> 30127325 |
Pei Lin1, Chun-Chao Chang2,3, Kuo-Ching Yuan4, Hsing-Jung Yeh5, Sheng-Uei Fang6, Tiong Cheng7, Kai-Tse Teng8, Kuo-Ching Chao9,10, Jui-Hsiang Tang11, Wei-Yu Kao12,13, Pao-Ying Lin14, Ju-Shian Liu15, Jung-Su Chang16,17,18,19.
Abstract
Red blood cell (RBC) aggregation and iron status are interrelated and strongly influenced by dietary factors, and their alterations pose a great risk of dyslipidemia and metabolic syndrome (MetS). Currently, RBC aggregation-related dietary patterns remain unclear. This study investigated the dietary patterns that were associated with RBC aggregation and their predictive effects on hyperlipidemia and MetS. Anthropometric and blood biochemical data and food frequency questionnaires were collected from 212 adults. Dietary patterns were derived using reduced rank regression from 32 food groups. Adjusted linear regression showed that hepcidin, soluble CD163, and serum transferrin saturation (%TS) independently predicted RBC aggregation (all p < 0.01). Age-, sex-, and log-transformed body mass index (BMI)-adjusted prevalence rate ratio (PRR) showed a significant positive correlation between RBC aggregation and hyperlipidemia (p-trend < 0.05). RBC aggregation and iron-related dietary pattern scores (high consumption of noodles and deep-fried foods and low intake of steamed, boiled, and raw food, dairy products, orange, red, and purple vegetables, white and light-green vegetables, seafood, and rice) were also significantly associated with hyperlipidemia (p-trend < 0.05) and MetS (p-trend = 0.01) after adjusting for age, sex, and log-transformed BMI. Our results may help dieticians develop dietary strategies for preventing dyslipidemia and MetS.Entities:
Keywords: dietary pattern; dyslipidemia; hepcidin; metabolic syndrome; red blood cell aggregation; soluble (s) CD163
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30127325 PMCID: PMC6115951 DOI: 10.3390/nu10081127
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Directed acyclic graph of the reduced rank regression (RRR) conceptual framework. RBC: red blood cell; %TS: serum transferrin saturation; MetS: metabolic syndrome; sCD163: soluble cluster of differentiation 163.
Baseline characteristics of the study population according to quartiles of RBC aggregation levels (N = 196).
| RBC Aggregation CSS (mPa), Quartiles $ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 ( | Q2 ( | Q3 ( | Q4 ( | ||
| Age (years) | 42.13 ± 13.99 | 40.08 ± 13.00 | 41.51 ± 11.53 | 46.63 ± 10.68 | 0.055 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.72 ± 4.97 | 23.12 ± 4.02 | 24.86 ± 5.61 | 27.16 ± 5.64 | 0.001 |
| Male (n, %) | 23 (47.9) | 24 (49.0) | 24 (49.8) | 24 (49.0) | 0.999 |
| Hyperlipidemia (n, %) | 15 (31.3) | 12 (24.5) | 18 (36.0) | 31 (63.3) | <0.001 |
| MetS (n, %) | 11 (22.9) | 5 (10.2) | 15 (30.0) | 22 (44.9) | 0.001 |
|
| |||||
| Total C (mg/dL) | 188.44 ± 38.73 | 193.00 ± 27.01 | 200.60 ± 36.92 | 213.49 ± 41.69 | 0.005 |
| TG (mg/dL) | 99.54 ± 67.29 | 100.29 ± 63.02 | 116.18 ± 67.40 | 165.88 ± 88.67 | <0.001 |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 60.21 ± 15.60 | 56.33 ± 12.59 | 55.10 ± 16.48 | 53.73 ± 15.78 | 0.184 |
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 105.83 ± 30.81 | 115.31 ± 25.52 | 120.94 ± 31.23 | 129.24 ± 35.53 | 0.003 |
|
| |||||
| HCT (%) | 42.28 ± 5.58 | 43.72 ± 7.13 | 42.33 ± 7.97 | 43.90 ± 8.90 | 0.577 |
| Hb (g/dL) | 14.55 ± 1.99 | 15.00 ± 2.63 | 14.44 ± 3.05 | 15.04 ± 3.18 | 0.614 |
| Free Hb (μg/mL) | 157.27 ± 49.48 | 143.84 ± 52.73 | 162.09 ± 45.42 | 154.99 ± 59.97 | 0.472 |
| SF (ng/mL) | 141.74 ± 169.22 | 131.27 ± 103.73 | 139.56 ± 167.79 | 189.90 ± 137.88 | 0.191 |
| TS (%) | 31.51 ± 12.05 | 35.01 ± 12.21 | 27.97 ± 13.75 | 25.71 ± 8.67 | 0.001 |
| Hepcidin (ng/mL) | 116.87 ± 101.17 | 151.07 ± 86.61 | 136.78 ± 102.47 | 207.19 ± 123.12 | <0.001 |
| sCD163 (ng/mL) | 761.47 ± 470.38 | 744.03 ± 411.93 | 810.59 ± 299.62 | 978.99 ± 514.13 | 0.069 |
p-trend values were analyzed by a general linear model for continuous variables, and Chi-squared for categorical variables. Continuous data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, while categorical data are presented as a number (percentage of the same group). $ Red blood cell (RBC) aggregation critical shear stress (CSS) quartiles: Quartile 1, male ≤ 224.35, female ≤ 239.03; Quartile 2, 224.35 < male ≤ 263.12, 239.03 < female ≤ 284.21; Quartile 3, 263.12 < male ≤ 324.55, 284.21 < female ≤ 351.37; Quartile 4, male > 324.55, female > 351.37 mPa. BMI: body mass index; C: cholesterol; TG: triglycerides; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HCT: hematocrit; Hb: hemoglobin; SF: ferritin; TS: serum transferrin saturation; sCD163: soluble cluster of differentiation 163.
Figure 2Prevalence rate ratio (PRR) and 95% confidence intervals of red blood cell (RBC) aggregation critical shear stress (CSS) quartile levels for hyperlipidemia adjusted by age, sex, and log-transformed body mass index (BMI); * p ≤ 0.05.
Multivariate linear regression of correlations between log-transformed RBC aggregation and selected anthropometric, inflammation, lipid, glucose, and iron indicators.
| Univariate | Model 1 # | Model 2 $ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ß (95% CI) | ß (95% CI) | ß (95% CI) | ||||
| Age (years) | 0.004 (0.001–0.007) | 0.020 | 0.003 (0.000–0.006) | 0.035 | 0.001 (−0.003–0.004) | 0.713 |
| Log BMI (kg/m2) | 0.316 (0.120–0.512) | 0.002 | 0.378 (0.182–0.574) | <0.001 | 0.010 (−0.195–0.215) | 0.923 |
| Hyperlipidemia | ||||||
| Control | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
| Hyperlipidemia | 0.169 (0.092–0.246) | <0.001 | 0.124 (0.042–0.205) | 0.003 | 0.025 (−0.061–0.110) | 0.572 |
| MetS | ||||||
| Control | Ref | Ref | ||||
| MetS | 0.151 (0.065–0.237) | 0.001 | 0.072 (−0.027–0.171) | 0.155 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Log total C (mg/dL) | 0.450 (0.247–0.653) | <0.001 | 0.390 (0.192–0.587) | <0.001 | ||
| Log TG (mg/dL) | 0.144 (0.084–0.203) | <0.001 | 0.131 (0.061–0.201) | <0.001 | ||
| Log HDL-C (mg/dL) | −0.102 (−0.254–0.050) | 0.188 | ||||
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 0.002 (0.001–0.004) | <0.001 | 0.002 (0.001–0.003) | <0.001 | 0.001 (0.000–0.002) | 0.073 |
|
| ||||||
| Log HCT (%) | −0.087 (−0.324–0.151) | 0.472 | ||||
| Log Hb (g/dL) | −0.104 (−0.322–0.114) | 0.350 | ||||
| Free Hb (μg/mL) | 0.000 (−0.001–0.001) | 0.896 | ||||
| Log SF (ng/mL) | 0.021 (−0.012–0.053) | 0.208 | ||||
| TS (%) | −0.006 (−0.009–0.003) | <0.001 | −0.004 (−0.007–0.001) | 0.017 | −0.006 (−0.010–0.003) | <0.001 |
| Hepcidin (ng/mL) | 0.0007 (0.0003–0.0010) | <0.001 | 0.0008 (0.0004–0.0011) | <0.001 | 0.0009 (0.0005–0.0013) | <0.001 |
| Log sCD163 (ng/mL) | 0.152 (0.071–0.233) | <0.001 | 0.119 (0.037–0.201) | 0.005 | 0.116 (0.040–0.193) | 0.003 |
# Model 1: Adjusted for age, sex, and log BMI; $ Model 2: Adjusted for age, sex, log BMI, LDL-C, TS, hepcidin, and log sCD163. RBC: red blood cell; BMI: body mass index; MetS: metabolic syndrome; C: cholesterol; TG: triglycerides; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HCT: hematocrit; Hb: hemoglobin; SF: ferritin; TS: serum transferrin saturation; sCD163: soluble cluster of differentiation 163.
Figure 3Multivariate linear regression of correlation between log-transformed red blood cell (RBC) aggregation critical shear stress (CSS), medians of hepcidin and transferrin saturation (%TS) levels adjusted by age, sex, and log-transformed body mass index (BMI); β, unstandardized coefficients. * p ≤ 0.05, *** p ≤ 0.001.
Food groups which were strongly associated with RBC aggregation-related dietary pattern scores identified by using an RRR.
| Food Group | Explained Variation (%) | Factor Loading * |
|---|---|---|
| Noodles | 12.66 | 0.38 |
| Deep-fried foods | 6.78 | 0.28 |
| Steamed/boiled/raw foods | 10.43 | −0.34 |
| Dairy products | 7.73 | −0.30 |
| Orange/red/purple vegetables | 7.49 | −0.29 |
| White/light-green vegetables | 5.39 | −0.25 |
| Seafood | 4.13 | −0.22 |
| Rice | 3.74 | −0.21 |
| Total explained variation (%): | 58.37 |
* Factor loadings are correlations between food groups and the first dietary pattern scores (correlation coefficient for the RRR-derived pattern ≥ |0.20|). RRR: reduced rank regression.
Adjusted linear regression of the relationship between the quartiles of dietary pattern score levels and log-transformed RBC aggregation.
| Dietary Pattern Scores | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quartile 1 | Quartile 2 | Quartile 3 | Quartile 4 | |||||
| Univariate | Ref | 0.086 (−0.009–0.181) | 0.076 | 0.086 (−0.016–0.189) | 0.097 | 0.193 (0.084–0.302) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Model 1 * | Ref | 0.083 (−0.011–0.177) | 0.081 | 0.085 (−0.017–0.188) | 0.101 | 0.180 (0.071–0.288) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Model 2 # | Ref | 0.087 (−0.007–0.180) | 0.068 | 0.087 (−0.015–0.188) | 0.093 | 0.208 (0.102–0.314) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Model 3 $ | Ref | 0.085 (−0.004–0.174) | 0.062 | 0.062 (−0.036–0.161) | 0.214 | 0.190 (0.074–0.306) | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Model 4 ^ | Ref | 0.065 (−0.028–0.158) | 0.167 | 0.068 (−0.032–0.168) | 0.178 | 0.155 (0.049–0.261) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Model 5 & | Ref | 0.069 (−0.021–0.159) | 0.131 | 0.049 (−0.049–0.146) | 0.322 | 0.158 (0.045–0.270) | 0.007 | 0.024 |
* Model 1. adjusted for age; # Model 2: adjusted for age and sex; $ Model 3: adjusted for age, sex, and log BMI; ^ Model 4: adjusted for age, sex, and hyperlipidemia; & Model 5: adjusted for age, sex, log BMI, and hyperlipidemia. RBC: red blood cell.
Figure 4Prevalence rate ratio (PRR) and 95% confidence intervals of dietary pattern score quartile levels for hyperlipidemia and metabolic syndrome (MetS) adjusted for age, sex, and log-transformed body mass index (BMI). * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01.