Literature DB >> 30127024

Chance, long tails, and inference in a non-Gaussian, Bayesian theory of vocal learning in songbirds.

Baohua Zhou1, David Hofmann1,2, Itai Pinkoviezky1,2, Samuel J Sober3, Ilya Nemenman4,2,3.   

Abstract

Traditional theories of sensorimotor learning posit that animals use sensory error signals to find the optimal motor command in the face of Gaussian sensory and motor noise. However, most such theories cannot explain common behavioral observations, for example, that smaller sensory errors are more readily corrected than larger errors and large abrupt (but not gradually introduced) errors lead to weak learning. Here, we propose a theory of sensorimotor learning that explains these observations. The theory posits that the animal controls an entire probability distribution of motor commands rather than trying to produce a single optimal command and that learning arises via Bayesian inference when new sensory information becomes available. We test this theory using data from a songbird, the Bengalese finch, that is adapting the pitch (fundamental frequency) of its song following perturbations of auditory feedback using miniature headphones. We observe the distribution of the sung pitches to have long, non-Gaussian tails, which, within our theory, explains the observed dynamics of learning. Further, the theory makes surprising predictions about the dynamics of the shape of the pitch distribution, which we confirm experimentally.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dynamical Bayesian inference; power-law tails; sensorimotor learning; vocal control

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30127024      PMCID: PMC6130353          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1713020115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  45 in total

1.  Motor learning is optimally tuned to the properties of motor noise.

Authors:  Robert J van Beers
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  The benefits of noise in neural systems: bridging theory and experiment.

Authors:  Mark D McDonnell; Lawrence M Ward
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  A lightweight, headphones-based system for manipulating auditory feedback in songbirds.

Authors:  Lukas A Hoffmann; Conor W Kelly; David A Nicholson; Samuel J Sober
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Genetic variation interacts with experience to determine interindividual differences in learned song.

Authors:  David G Mets; Michael S Brainard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Uncertainty of feedback and state estimation determines the speed of motor adaptation.

Authors:  Kunlin Wei; Konrad Körding
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Female song in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus): acoustic song features that contain individual identity information and sex differences.

Authors:  Allison H Hahn; Amanda Krysler; Christopher B Sturdy
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 7.  Variations on a theme: Songbirds, variability, and sensorimotor error correction.

Authors:  B D Kuebrich; S J Sober
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Neural dynamics as sampling: a model for stochastic computation in recurrent networks of spiking neurons.

Authors:  Lars Buesing; Johannes Bill; Bernhard Nessler; Wolfgang Maass
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Vocal experimentation in the juvenile songbird requires a basal ganglia circuit.

Authors:  Bence P Olveczky; Aaron S Andalman; Michale S Fee
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Universally sloppy parameter sensitivities in systems biology models.

Authors:  Ryan N Gutenkunst; Joshua J Waterfall; Fergal P Casey; Kevin S Brown; Christopher R Myers; James P Sethna
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  6 in total

1.  Neural Substrates of Drosophila Larval Anemotaxis.

Authors:  Tihana Jovanic; Michael Winding; Albert Cardona; James W Truman; Marc Gershow; Marta Zlatic
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Unsupervised Bayesian Ising Approximation for decoding neural activity and other biological dictionaries.

Authors:  Damián G Hernández; Samuel J Sober; Ilya Nemenman
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 8.713

3.  Lapses in perceptual decisions reflect exploration.

Authors:  Sashank Pisupati; Lital Chartarifsky-Lynn; Anup Khanal; Anne K Churchland
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Dopamine Depletion Affects Vocal Acoustics and Disrupts Sensorimotor Adaptation in Songbirds.

Authors:  Varun Saravanan; Lukas A Hoffmann; Amanda L Jacob; Gordon J Berman; Samuel J Sober
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-06-12

5.  Variance adaptation in navigational decision making.

Authors:  Ruben Gepner; Jason Wolk; Digvijay Shivaji Wadekar; Sophie Dvali; Marc Gershow
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Generating synthetic aging trajectories with a weighted network model using cross-sectional data.

Authors:  Spencer Farrell; Arnold Mitnitski; Kenneth Rockwood; Andrew Rutenberg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.