Literature DB >> 25305664

Variations on a theme: Songbirds, variability, and sensorimotor error correction.

B D Kuebrich1, S J Sober2.   

Abstract

Songbirds provide a powerful animal model for investigating how the brain uses sensory feedback to correct behavioral errors. Here, we review a recent study in which we used online manipulations of auditory feedback to quantify the relationship between sensory error size, motor variability, and vocal plasticity. We found that although inducing small auditory errors evoked relatively large compensatory changes in behavior, as error size increased the magnitude of error correction declined. Furthermore, when we induced large errors such that auditory signals no longer overlapped with the baseline distribution of feedback, the magnitude of error correction approached zero. This pattern suggests a simple and robust strategy for the brain to maintain the accuracy of learned behaviors by evaluating sensory signals relative to the previously experienced distribution of feedback. Drawing from recent studies of auditory neurophysiology and song discrimination, we then speculate as to the mechanistic underpinnings of the results obtained in our behavioral experiments. Finally, we review how our own and other studies exploit the strengths of the songbird system, both in the specific context of vocal systems and more generally as a model of the neural control of complex behavior.
Copyright © 2014 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal models; sensorimotor learning; sensory feedback; songbird; variability; vocal control

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25305664      PMCID: PMC4397105          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.09.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  69 in total

1.  Differential influence of frequency, timing, and intensity cues in a complex acoustic categorization task.

Authors:  Katherine I Nagel; Helen M McLendon; Allison J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Altered auditory feedback and the treatment of stuttering: a review.

Authors:  Michelle Lincoln; Ann Packman; Mark Onslow
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 2.538

3.  Role of syringeal muscles in controlling the phonology of bird song.

Authors:  F Goller; R A Suthers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Variable sequencing is actively maintained in a well learned motor skill.

Authors:  Timothy L Warren; Jonathan D Charlesworth; Evren C Tumer; Michael S Brainard
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Organized representation of spectrotemporal features in songbird auditory forebrain.

Authors:  Gunsoo Kim; Allison Doupe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Coordination and coarticulation in speech production.

Authors:  C A Fowler; E Saltzman
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1993 Apr-Sep       Impact factor: 1.500

7.  A study of speech deterioration in post-lingually deafened adults.

Authors:  R Cowie; E Douglas-Cowie; A G Kerr
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 1.469

Review 8.  The genomics of memory and learning in songbirds.

Authors:  David F Clayton
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 8.929

9.  A synaptic basis for auditory-vocal integration in the songbird.

Authors:  Eric E Bauer; Melissa J Coleman; Todd F Roberts; Arani Roy; Jonathan F Prather; Richard Mooney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Learning the microstructure of successful behavior.

Authors:  Jonathan D Charlesworth; Evren C Tumer; Timothy L Warren; Michael S Brainard
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  8 in total

1.  Chance, long tails, and inference in a non-Gaussian, Bayesian theory of vocal learning in songbirds.

Authors:  Baohua Zhou; David Hofmann; Itai Pinkoviezky; Samuel J Sober; Ilya Nemenman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Thalamostriatal and cerebellothalamic pathways in a songbird, the Bengalese finch.

Authors:  David A Nicholson; Todd F Roberts; Samuel J Sober
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 3.  Insights into the Neural and Genetic Basis of Vocal Communication.

Authors:  Genevieve Konopka; Todd F Roberts
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Higher songs of city birds may not be an individual response to noise.

Authors:  Sue Anne Zollinger; Peter J B Slater; Erwin Nemeth; Henrik Brumm
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  General variability leads to specific adaptation toward optimal movement policies.

Authors:  Sabrina J Abram; Katherine L Poggensee; Natalia Sánchez; Surabhi N Simha; James M Finley; Steven H Collins; J Maxwell Donelan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 10.900

6.  Unsupervised Bayesian Ising Approximation for decoding neural activity and other biological dictionaries.

Authors:  Damián G Hernández; Samuel J Sober; Ilya Nemenman
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 8.713

7.  Dopamine Depletion Affects Vocal Acoustics and Disrupts Sensorimotor Adaptation in Songbirds.

Authors:  Varun Saravanan; Lukas A Hoffmann; Amanda L Jacob; Gordon J Berman; Samuel J Sober
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-06-12

8.  Shared mechanisms of auditory and non-auditory vocal learning in the songbird brain.

Authors:  James N McGregor; Abigail L Grassler; Paul I Jaffe; Amanda Louise Jacob; Michael S Brainard; Samuel J Sober
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 8.713

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.