BACKGROUND: There is an emerging consensus that clinicians should initiate a proactive "goals of care conversation" (GoCC) with patients whose serious illness is likely to involve decisions about life-sustaining treatments (LSTs) such as artificial nutrition, ventilator support, or cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This conversation is intended to elicit the patient's values, goals, and preferences as a basis for shared decisions about treatment planning. LST decisions are often postponed until the patient is within days or even hours of death and no longer able to make his or her goals and preferences known. Decisions then fall to surrogates who may be uncertain about what the patient would have wanted. LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENT DECISIONS INITIATIVE (LSTDI): The Veterans Health Administration's Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative (LSTDI) was designed to ensure that patients' goals, values, and preferences for LSTs are elicited, documented, and honored across the continuum of care. The LSTDI includes a coordinated set of evidence-based strategies that consists of enterprisewide practice standards for conducting, documenting, and supporting high-quality GoCCs; staff training to enhance proficiency in conducting, documenting, and supporting GoCCs; standardized, durable electronic health record tools for documenting GoCCs; monitoring and information technology tools to support implementation and improvement; a two-year multifacility demonstration project conducted to test and refine strategies and tools and to identify strong practices; and a program of study to evaluate the LSTDI and identify strategies critical to improving care for patients with serious illness. CONCLUSION: The LSTDI moves beyond traditional advance care planning by addressing well-documented barriers to goal-concordant care for seriously ill patients. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: There is an emerging consensus that clinicians should initiate a proactive "goals of care conversation" (GoCC) with patients whose serious illness is likely to involve decisions about life-sustaining treatments (LSTs) such as artificial nutrition, ventilator support, or cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This conversation is intended to elicit the patient's values, goals, and preferences as a basis for shared decisions about treatment planning. LST decisions are often postponed until the patient is within days or even hours of death and no longer able to make his or her goals and preferences known. Decisions then fall to surrogates who may be uncertain about what the patient would have wanted. LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENT DECISIONS INITIATIVE (LSTDI): The Veterans Health Administration's Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative (LSTDI) was designed to ensure that patients' goals, values, and preferences for LSTs are elicited, documented, and honored across the continuum of care. The LSTDI includes a coordinated set of evidence-based strategies that consists of enterprisewide practice standards for conducting, documenting, and supporting high-quality GoCCs; staff training to enhance proficiency in conducting, documenting, and supporting GoCCs; standardized, durable electronic health record tools for documenting GoCCs; monitoring and information technology tools to support implementation and improvement; a two-year multifacility demonstration project conducted to test and refine strategies and tools and to identify strong practices; and a program of study to evaluate the LSTDI and identify strategies critical to improving care for patients with serious illness. CONCLUSION: The LSTDI moves beyond traditional advance care planning by addressing well-documented barriers to goal-concordant care for seriously ill patients. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Cari Levy; Mary Ersek; Winifred Scott; Joan G Carpenter; Jennifer Kononowech; Ciaran Phibbs; Jill Lowry; Jennifer Cohen; Marybeth Foglia Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Manjula Kurella Tamura; Laura Holdsworth; Margaret Stedman; Annette Aldous; Steven M Asch; Jialin Han; Glenda Harbert; Karl A Lorenz; Elizabeth Malcolm; Amanda Nicklas; Alvin H Moss; Dale E Lupu Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2022-09-14 Impact factor: 10.614
Authors: Mary Ersek; Anne Sales; Shimrit Keddem; Roman Ayele; Leah M Haverhals; Kate H Magid; Jennifer Kononowech; Andrew Murray; Joan G Carpenter; Mary Beth Foglia; Lucinda Potter; Jennifer McKenzie; Darlene Davis; Cari Levy Journal: Implement Sci Commun Date: 2022-07-20
Authors: Joan G Carpenter; Winifred Josephine Scott; Jennifer Kononowech; Mary Beth Foglia; Leah M Haverhals; Robert Hogikyan; Ann Kolanowski; Zach Landis-Lewis; Cari Levy; Susan C Miller; V J Periyakoil; Ciaran S Phibbs; Lucinda Potter; Anne Sales; Mary Ersek Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 3.734
Authors: Joan Carpenter; Susan C Miller; Ann M Kolanowski; Michele J Karel; Vyjeyanthi S Periyakoil; Jill Lowery; Cari Levy; Anne E Sales; Mary Ersek Journal: J Gerontol Nurs Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 1.254
Authors: Cati Brown-Johnson; Nadia Safaeinili; Dani Zionts; Laura M Holdsworth; Jonathan G Shaw; Steven M Asch; Megan Mahoney; Marcy Winget Journal: Learn Health Syst Date: 2019-12-21
Authors: Renda Soylemez Wiener; So Yeon Ivy Kim; Terri R Fried; Jennifer Cohen; Mary Beth Foglia; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Amy M Linsky Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-03-09 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Zach Landis-Lewis; Jennifer Kononowech; Winifred J Scott; Robert V Hogikyan; Joan G Carpenter; V S Periyakoil; Susan C Miller; Cari Levy; Mary Ersek; Anne Sales Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2020-01-21 Impact factor: 7.327