Literature DB >> 33147429

Goals of care and COVID-19: A GOOD framework for dealing with uncertainty - CORRIGENDUM.

Aldis H Petriceks1, Andrea Wershof Schwartz1,2,3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; corrigendum; decision-making; end-of-life care; goals of care; uncertainty

Year:  2020        PMID: 33147429      PMCID: PMC8005785          DOI: 10.1017/S1478951520000681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Support Care        ISSN: 1478-9515


× No keyword cloud information.
In the original publication of this editorial (Petriceks and Schwartz, 2020), a number of errors appeared. The name of co-author Andrea Wershof Schwartz was published with an erroneous initial, and her affiliation listing omitted her affiliation with Harvard Medical School. The published version of Table 1 also omitted some necessary citations for the sources of the potential resources listed in the rightmost column. The full, correct version of Table 1 and its notes appears below:
Table 1.

GOOD framework

Clinician taskPotential uncertaintiesPotential resources
GoalsDetermine the goals and values of the patientPatient may not know their own goals, or may have goals which contradict one another– Patient Priorities Careb– Stanford Letter Projectc
OptionsDetermine and describe options available to patient — including details and probabilities — given their goalsClinicians may be uncertain about clinical options; patient may have uncertainties or misconceptions but not know how to clarify– VHA LSTDId– Video Decision Tools– CAPCe
OpinionsElicit patient preferences regarding options available; communicate clinician perspective on most conducive option; arrive at shared decisionClinicians may struggle to provide clinical recommendation due to prognostic uncertainty– Clinical Frailty Scale– ePrognosisf– CAPCe
DocumentationDocument outcome of decision-making process; highlight reasoning behind any decisions; make note of all participantsClinicians often write brief notes (e.g., “DNR”), which may not reflect the nuance and situational dependency of patient values– POLSTg– Prepare for Your Careh– VHA LSTDId

Adapted from the Stanford University School of Medicine End-of-Life Curriculum for Medical Teachers.

Patient Priorities Care, 2019.

Stanford University, 2020.

Veterans Health Affairs Life-Sustaining Treatments Decisions Initiative (Foglia et al., 2019).

Center to Advance Palliative Care (2020).

UCSF, 2020.

Portable Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment.

Sudore et al., 2017.

GOOD framework Adapted from the Stanford University School of Medicine End-of-Life Curriculum for Medical Teachers. Patient Priorities Care, 2019. Stanford University, 2020. Veterans Health Affairs Life-Sustaining Treatments Decisions Initiative (Foglia et al., 2019). Center to Advance Palliative Care (2020). UCSF, 2020. Portable Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment. Sudore et al., 2017. Additionally, the authors of the editorial would like to provide the ORCID for Dr. Schwartz, which was not included in the original publication. The authors apologize for these errors. The editorial has been updated.
  3 in total

1.  Effect of the PREPARE Website vs an Easy-to-Read Advance Directive on Advance Care Planning Documentation and Engagement Among Veterans: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Rebecca L Sudore; John Boscardin; Mariko A Feuz; Ryan D McMahan; Mary T Katen; Deborah E Barnes
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  A Comprehensive Approach to Eliciting, Documenting, and Honoring Patient Wishes for Care Near the End of Life: The Veterans Health Administration's Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative.

Authors:  Mary Beth Foglia; Jill Lowery; Virginia Ashby Sharpe; Paul Tompkins; Ellen Fox
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2018-08-17

3.  Goals of care and COVID-19: A GOOD framework for dealing with uncertainty.

Authors:  Aldis H Petriceks; Andrea Wershof Schwartz
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2020-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.