Literature DB >> 30126010

Electrical surrogate for detection of severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Kyndaron Reinier1, Aapo L Aro1,2, Audrey Uy-Evanado1, Carmen Rusinaru1, Harpriya S Chugh1, Takahiro Shiota1, Jonathan Jui3, Sumeet S Chugh1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis and therapy improves outcomes in heart failure with severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤35%), but some patients may remain undiagnosed. We hypothesized that a combination of electrocardiogram (ECG) markers may identify individuals with severely reduced LVEF.
METHODS: From a community-based study in the Northwest US (the Oregon Sudden Unexpected Death Study), we evaluated the prevalence of conventional ECG markers by LVEF. We then evaluated the association of nine additional ECG markers and LVEF. We validated the correlation of these ECG markers and LVEF in a separate, large health system in Los Angeles, California.
RESULTS: In the discovery population (n = 1,047), patients with LVEF ≤35% were twice as likely as those with LVEF >35% to have ≥1 conventional ECG abnormality. In the subset without conventional ECG abnormalities, ≥4 abnormal ECG markers from the expanded panel were found in 12% vs. 1% of patients with LVEF ≤35% and >35%, respectively. In the validation population (n = 9,742), 44% with LVEF ≤35% and 17% with LVEF >35% had ≥1 conventional ECG abnormality. In patients without conventional ECG abnormalities (n = 7,601), 40% with LVEF ≤35% and 5% with LVEF >35% had ≥4 abnormal ECG markers from the expanded panel. Each additional abnormal ECG marker from the expanded panel (range 0 to ≥4) more than doubled the odds of LVEF ≤35%.
CONCLUSIONS: An expanded panel of easily obtained ECG markers correlated strongly with severely reduced LVEF in two separate populations. This electrical surrogate score could facilitate diagnosis of severely reduced LVEF, and warrants prospective evaluation.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiomyopathy; echocardiography; electrocardiography; heart failure; left ventricular ejection fraction; left ventricular systolic dysfunction

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30126010      PMCID: PMC6264892          DOI: 10.1111/anec.12591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol        ISSN: 1082-720X            Impact factor:   1.468


  33 in total

1.  QT interval lengthening in cardiac disease relates more to left ventricular systolic dysfunction than to autonomic function.

Authors:  P Davey
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 15.534

2.  Common errors in computer electrocardiogram interpretation.

Authors:  Maya E Guglin; Deepak Thatai
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  Frequency and determinants of implantable cardioverter defibrillator deployment among primary prevention candidates with subsequent sudden cardiac arrest in the community.

Authors:  Kumar Narayanan; Kyndaron Reinier; Audrey Uy-Evanado; Carmen Teodorescu; Harpriya Chugh; Eloi Marijon; Karen Gunson; Jonathan Jui; Sumeet S Chugh
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Value of the electrocardiogram in identifying heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Authors:  A P Davie; C M Francis; M P Love; L Caruana; I R Starkey; T R Shaw; G R Sutherland; J J McMurray
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-27

5.  A specific ECG triad associated with congestive heart failure.

Authors:  A L Goldberger
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 6.  Sympathetic nervous system activation in human heart failure: clinical implications of an updated model.

Authors:  John S Floras
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Limitations of electrocardiographic scoring systems for estimation of left ventricular function.

Authors:  S G Young; S Abouantoun; M Savvides; E B Madsen; V Froelicher
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction among patients with risk factors for heart failure.

Authors:  David W Baker; Robert C Bahler; Robert S Finkelhor; Michael S Lauer
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Prevalence, correlates, and prognostic significance of QRS prolongation in heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Lars H Lund; Juliane Jurga; Magnus Edner; Lina Benson; Ulf Dahlström; Cecilia Linde; Urban Alehagen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Trends in heart failure incidence and survival in a community-based population.

Authors:  Véronique L Roger; Susan A Weston; Margaret M Redfield; Jens P Hellermann-Homan; Jill Killian; Barbara P Yawn; Steven J Jacobsen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  3 in total

1.  Electrical surrogate for detection of severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Authors:  Kyndaron Reinier; Aapo L Aro; Audrey Uy-Evanado; Carmen Rusinaru; Harpriya S Chugh; Takahiro Shiota; Jonathan Jui; Sumeet S Chugh
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  External validation of a deep learning electrocardiogram algorithm to detect ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  Itzhak Zachi Attia; Andrew S Tseng; Ernest Diez Benavente; Jose R Medina-Inojosa; Taane G Clark; Sofia Malyutina; Suraj Kapa; Henrik Schirmer; Alexander V Kudryavtsev; Peter A Noseworthy; Rickey E Carter; Andrew Ryabikov; Pablo Perel; Paul A Friedman; David A Leon; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  Electrocardiography Score for Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Wei-Chen Lin; Ming-Chon Hsiung; Wei-Hsian Yin; Tien-Ping Tsao; Wei-Tsung Lai; Kuan-Chih Huang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.