Literature DB >> 24048201

Frequency and determinants of implantable cardioverter defibrillator deployment among primary prevention candidates with subsequent sudden cardiac arrest in the community.

Kumar Narayanan1, Kyndaron Reinier, Audrey Uy-Evanado, Carmen Teodorescu, Harpriya Chugh, Eloi Marijon, Karen Gunson, Jonathan Jui, Sumeet S Chugh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence rates and influencing factors for deployment of primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) among subjects who eventually experience sudden cardiac arrest in the general population have not been evaluated. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Cases of adult sudden cardiac arrest with echocardiographic evaluation before the event were identified from the ongoing Oregon Sudden Unexpected Death Study (population approximately 1 million). Eligibility for primary ICD implantation was determined from medical records based on established guidelines. The frequency of prior primary ICD implantation in eligible subjects was evaluated, and ICD nonrecipients were characterized. Of 2093 cases (2003-2012), 448 had appropriate pre- sudden cardiac arrest left ventricular ejection fraction information available. Of these, 92 (20.5%) were eligible for primary ICD implantation, 304 (67.9%) were ineligible because of left ventricular ejection fraction >35%, and the remainder (52, 11.6%) had left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% but were ineligible on the basis of clinical guideline criteria. Among eligible subjects, only 12 (13.0%; 95% confidence interval, 6.1%-19.9%) received a primary ICD. Compared with recipients, primary ICD nonrecipients were older (age at ejection fraction assessment, 67.1±13.6 versus 58.5±14.8 years, P=0.05), with 20% aged ≥80 years (versus 0% among recipients, P=0.11). Additionally, a subgroup (26%) had either a clinical history of dementia or were undergoing chronic dialysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Only one fifth of the sudden cardiac arrest cases in the community were eligible for a primary prevention ICD before the event, but among these, a small proportion (13%) were actually implanted. Although older age and comorbidity may explain nondeployment in a subgroup of these cases, other determinants such as socioeconomic factors, health insurance, patient preference, and clinical practice patterns warrant further detailed investigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  death, sudden; epidemiology; heart arrest; implantable defibrillators; population; utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24048201     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  33 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of sudden cardiac death beyond the ICD: have we reached the boundary or are we just burning the surface?

Authors:  Niyada Naksuk; Christopher V DeSimone; Suraj Kapa; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2014-01-03

Review 2.  Arrhythmic risk stratification in heart failure: Time for the next step?

Authors:  Konstantinos A Gatzoulis; Antonios Sideris; Emmanuel Kanoupakis; Skevos Sideris; Nikolaos Nikolaou; Christos-Konstantinos Antoniou; Theofilos M Kolettis
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Comparative Effectiveness of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators for Primary Prevention in Women.

Authors:  Emily P Zeitler; Anne S Hellkamp; Phillip J Schulte; Gregg C Fonarow; Adrian F Hernandez; Eric D Peterson; Gillian D Sanders; Clyde W Yancy; Sana M Al-Khatib
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 8.790

4.  Improved Prediction of Sudden Cardiac Death Risk: Staying Within the Echocardiogram but Extending Beyond the Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Sumeet S Chugh; Audrey Uy-Evanado
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 5.  What to do about primary-prevention implantable cardiac defibrillators in patients with improved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Niyada Naksuk; Selcuk Adabag
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2014-06

Review 6.  Imaging for assessment of sudden death risk: current role and future prospects.

Authors:  Takeki Suzuki; Saman Nazarian; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Sumeet S Chugh
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 7.  The Future of Arrhythmias and Electrophysiology.

Authors:  Christine M Albert; William G Stevenson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Syncope and risk of sudden cardiac arrest in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Aapo L Aro; Carmen Rusinaru; Audrey Uy-Evanado; Kyndaron Reinier; Derek Phan; Karen Gunson; Jonathan Jui; Sumeet S Chugh
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 4.164

9.  Tpeak-to-Tend interval corrected for heart rate: A more precise measure of increased sudden death risk?

Authors:  Kelvin C M Chua; Carmen Rusinaru; Kyndaron Reinier; Audrey Uy-Evanado; Harpriya Chugh; Karen Gunson; Jonathan Jui; Sumeet S Chugh
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 10.  Update on prevention and treatment of sudden cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Yuliya Krokhaleva; Marmar Vaseghi
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 6.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.