| Literature DB >> 30123292 |
Juan Francisco Blanco1,2, Jesús García-Briñon2,3, Lorena Benito-Garzón1,2, David Pescador1,2, Sandra Muntión2,4, Fermín Sánchez-Guijo2,4.
Abstract
Significant research efforts have been undertaken during the last decades to treat musculoskeletal disorders and improve patient's mobility and quality of life. The goal is the return of function as quickly and completely as possible. Cellular therapy has been increasingly employed in this setting. The design of this study was focused on cell-based alternatives. The present study aimed at investigating the bone regeneration capacity of xenogeneic human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cell (hMSC) implantation with tricalcium phosphate (TCP) granules in an immunocompetent rabbit model of critical-size bone defects at the femoral condyles. Two experimental groups, TCP and hMSC + TCP, were compared. Combination of TCP and hMSC did not affect cell viability or osteogenic differentiation. We also observed significantly higher bone regeneration in vivo in the hMSC + TCP group, which also displayed better TCP osteointegration. Also, evidence of hMSC contribution to a better TCP osteointegration was noticed. Finally, no inflammatory reaction was detected, besides the xenotransplantation of human cells into an immunocompetent recipient. In summary, hMSC combined with TCP granules is a potential combination for bone regeneration purposes that provides better preclinical results compared to TCP alone.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30123292 PMCID: PMC6079361 DOI: 10.1155/2018/7089484
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cells Int Impact factor: 5.443
Figure 1Critical size femoral defect of 6 mm of diameter in a rabbit model.
Histological evaluation record.
| Histological score |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 2Immunophenotypic profile by flow cytometry.
Figure 3In vitro multilineage differentiation of hMSC: (a) control, (b) osteoblastic differentiation, and (c) adipocytic differentiation (scale bar: 50 μm).
Figure 4Photomicrographs of histological sections stained with toluidine blue taken from the TCP group (a–c). (a) The defect area was still evident 12 weeks after surgery. Connective tissue and adipose bone marrow were generated at the injured area (scale bar: 1000 μm). (b) The remaining TCP material was not fully osteointegrated (∗) (scale bar: 500 μm). (c) Scarce trabecular bone formation in association with TCP granules. Nonosteointegrated TCP granules (∗) were surrounded by connective tissue (red circle) or adipose bone marrow (red plus sign) (scale bar: 500 μm).
Figure 5Photomicrograph of histological section from the TCP group. Evidence of empty spaces filled by adipose bone marrow due to the absence of osteointegration of TCP granules (scale bar: 150 μm).
Figure 6Photomicrographs of histological sections stained with toluidine blue taken from the hMSC-TCP group (a–c). (a) Almost complete bone defect regeneration (scale bar: 1000 μm). (b) Newly formed bone showed disorganized and anastomosed trabeculae. TCP granules were osteointegrated (scale bar: 500 μm). (c) TCP granules were surrounded by newly formed trabecular bone (B). Not completely osteointegrated TCP granules (∗) were in contact with adipose bone marrow (red plus sign) or connective tissue (red circle) at their bone-free surface. Normal osteocytes were present at the regenerated trabecular bone (scale bar: 500 μm).
Figure 7Fluorescent images of the TCP group (a) and the hMSC-TCP group (b) (scale bar: 150 μm). (a) No immunofluorescence was detected. (b) Specific immunofluorescence detection of survival hMSC at the critical-size bone defect in inmunocompetent rabbit 12 weeks after surgery.
Score of the subjects included in the study according to the evaluated histological parameters included in Table 1.
| Subject number | TCP (left femur) | hMSC-TCP (right femur) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | 25 |
| 2 | 8 | 22 |
| 3 | 10 | 23 |
| 4 | 9 | 22 |
| 5 | 7 | 19 |
| 6 | 12 | 24 |
| 7 | 13 | 23 |
| 8 | 6 | 19 |
| 9 | 9 | 20 |
| 10 | 10 | 22 |
| 11 | 10 | 23 |
| 12 | 7 | 18 |
| 13 | 11 | 25 |
| 14 | 6 | 19 |
| Mean ± S.E.M. | 9.07 ± 0.57 | 21.71 ± 0.62 |
Figure 8Representation of score values (vertical axis) of the subjects included in the study (horizontal axis). Score values for bone regeneration of TCP group (left femur) were clearly lower than those of the hMSC-TCP group (right femur).