Literature DB >> 15860201

In vivo bone regeneration with injectable calcium phosphate biomaterial: a three-dimensional micro-computed tomographic, biomechanical and SEM study.

Olivier Gauthier1, Ralph Müller, Dietrich von Stechow, Bernard Lamy, Pierre Weiss, Jean-Michel Bouler, Eric Aguado, Guy Daculsi.   

Abstract

This in vivo study investigated the efficiency of an injectable calcium phosphate bone substitute (IBS) for bone regenerative procedures through non-destructive three-dimensional (3D) micro-tomographic (microCT) imaging, biomechanical testing with a non-destructive micro-indentation technique and 2D scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. The injectable biomaterial was obtained by mixing a biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) ceramic mineral phase and a cellulosic polymer. The BCP particles were 200-500 microm or 80-200 microm in diameter. The injectable material was implanted for 6 weeks into critical-sized bone defects at the distal end of rabbit femurs. Extensive new bone apposition was noted with both 2D and 3D techniques. Micro-CT showed that newly formed bone was in perfect continuity with the trabecular host bone structure and demonstrated the high interconnectivity of the restored bone network. For both IBS formulations, SEM and microCT gave very close measurements. The only detected significant difference concerned the amount of newly formed bone obtained with IBS 80-200 that appeared significantly higher with microCT analysis than with SEM (p=0.00007). Student t-tests did not show any significant difference in the amount of newly formed bone and remaining ceramic obtained from microCT analysis or SEM. Regression analysis showed satisfactory correlation between both the amount of newly formed bone and remaining ceramic obtained from microCT or SEM. For IBS 200-500, the newly formed bone rate inside the defect was 28.0+/-5.2% with SEM and yield strength of the samples was 18.8+/-5.4 MPa. For IBS 80-200, the newly formed bone rate inside the defect was 31.7+/-5.1% with SEM and yield strength of the samples was 26.8+/-4.5 MPa. Yield strength appeared well correlated with the amount of newly formed bone, specially observed with microCT. This study showed the ability of non-destructive techniques to investigate biological and mechanical aspects of bone replacement with injectable biomaterials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15860201     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  33 in total

1.  Three-dimensional micro-computed tomographic imaging of alveolar bone in experimental bone loss or repair.

Authors:  Chan Ho Park; Zachary R Abramson; Mario Taba; Qiming Jin; Jia Chang; Jaclynn M Kreider; Steven A Goldstein; William V Giannobile
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.993

Review 2.  Injectable foams for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Edna M Prieto; Jonathan M Page; Andrew J Harmata; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2013-10-11

3.  Porous bioactive scaffolds: characterization and biological performance in a model of tibial bone defect in rats.

Authors:  Hueliton Wilian Kido; Carla Roberta Tim; Paulo Sérgio Bossini; Nivaldo Antônio Parizotto; Cynthia Aparecida de Castro; Murilo Camuri Crovace; Ana Candida Martins Rodrigues; Edgar Dutra Zanotto; Oscar Peitl Filho; Fernanda de Freitas Anibal; Ana Claudia Muniz Rennó
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 4.  Biocomposites and hybrid biomaterials based on calcium orthophosphates.

Authors:  Sergey V Dorozhkin
Journal:  Biomatter       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep

5.  The use of BMP-2 coupled - Nanosilver-PLGA composite grafts to induce bone repair in grossly infected segmental defects.

Authors:  Zhong Zheng; Wei Yin; Janette N Zara; Weiming Li; Jinny Kwak; Rachna Mamidi; Min Lee; Ronald K Siu; Richard Ngo; Joyce Wang; Doug Carpenter; Xinli Zhang; Benjamin Wu; Kang Ting; Chia Soo
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Na-doped β-tricalcium phosphate: physico-chemical and in vitro biological properties.

Authors:  Laëtitia Obadia; Marion Julien; Sophie Quillard; Thierry Rouillon; Paul Pilet; Jérôme Guicheux; Bruno Bujoli; Jean-Michel Bouler
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Low level laser therapy does not modulate the outcomes of a highly bioactive glass-ceramic (Biosilicate) on bone consolidation in rats.

Authors:  Poliani Oliveira; Daniel Araki Ribeiro; Elaine Favaro Pipi; Patricia Driusso; Nivaldo A Parizotto; Ana Claudia Muniz Renno
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 8.  Pre-clinical characterization of tissue engineering constructs for bone and cartilage regeneration.

Authors:  Jordan E Trachtenberg; Tiffany N Vo; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Periodontal regeneration in experimentally-induced alveolar bone dehiscence by an improved porous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic in beagle dogs.

Authors:  Han Shi; Jia Ma; Ning Zhao; Yangxi Chen; Yunmao Liao
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Injectable biomaterials for regenerating complex craniofacial tissues.

Authors:  James D Kretlow; Simon Young; Leda Klouda; Mark Wong; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 30.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.