| Literature DB >> 35330290 |
Ying Yue1, Mingfang Jiang1, Hanying Hu1, Jinghui Wu1, Haoran Sun1, Hong Jin1, Taiping Hou1, Ke Tao1.
Abstract
The fungal strain BS5 was isolated from a soil sample collected in the Tibetan Plateau, which displayed good insecticidal activity and was identified as Talaromyces purpureogenus based on morphological and molecular analysis. This study aimed to evaluate the insecticidal activity and identify the active compound of the strain BS5 against the locust Locusta migratoria manilensis. The insecticidal activity of the fermented broth of BS5 was at 100% after 7 days against locusts. We extracted the fermented broth of BS5 and then evaluated the insecticidal activity of the extracts against locusts. The ethyl acetate extract exhibited promising activity levels with an LC50 value of 1077.94 μg/mL and was separated through silica gel column chromatography. The UPLC-Q-Exactive Orbitrap/MS system was employed to analyze the active fraction Fr2.2.2 (with an LC50 value of 674.87 μg/mL), and two compounds were identified: phellamurin and rubratoxin B.Entities:
Keywords: Locusta migratoria manilensis; Talaromyces purpureogenus; Tibetan Plateau; UPLC-Q-Exactive Orbitrap/MS; insecticidal activity; locust
Year: 2022 PMID: 35330290 PMCID: PMC8949156 DOI: 10.3390/jof8030288
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
Parameter setting of UPLC-Q-Exactive Orbitrap.
| Parameter | Set Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Source of ion | Spray voltage | 3.5 kV (+)/3.2 kV (−) |
| Capillary temperature | 320 °C | |
| Sheath gas | 35 arb | |
| AUX gas | 10 arb | |
| Sweep gas | 0 arb | |
| Probe heater temperature | 350 °C | |
| S-lens | 60 | |
| Mass spectrometry scanning | Scan mode | Full MS-ddms2 |
| Full MS scan range | 100 to 1500 | |
| Spectrum data type | Profile | |
| Resolution | Full MS: 70,000 | |
| MS/MS: 17,500 | ||
| AGC target | Full MS: 1e6 | |
| MS/MS: 2e5 | ||
| Maximum IT | Full MS: 100 ms | |
| MS/MS: 50 ms | ||
| Loop count | 3 | |
| MSX count | 1 | |
| Isolation width | 1.5 | |
| NCE (stepped NCE) | 20, 40, 60 | |
| Minimum AGC target | 8e3 | |
| Intensity threshold | 1.6e5 | |
| Dynamic exclution | 5 s |
Figure 1Method route of calculation.
The mortality rates of extracts of fungus BS5.
| Extracts | Concentration | Mortality (%; means ± SE) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (µg/mL) | 1st Day | 2nd Day | 3rd Day | 4th Day | |
| PEE | 625 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 2.27 | 0.00 ± 4.65h |
| 1250 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 2.27 | 0.00 ± 4.65h | |
| 2500 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 2.27 | 0.00 ± 4.65h | |
| 5000 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 2.27 | 2.33 ± 4.03h | |
| 10,000 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 2.27 | 6.98 ± 2.33gh | |
| DE | 625 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 2.27 | 0.00 ± 4.65h |
| 1250 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 2.27 | 2.33 ± 4.03h | |
| 2500 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 2.28 ± 2.27 | 4.66 ± 4.65h | |
| 5000 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 4.55 ± 3.94 | 11.63 ± 2.32gh | |
| 10,000 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 6.67 ± 3.85 | 13.64 ± 2.27 | 27.91 ± 6.15ef | |
| EAE | 625 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 8.89 ± 2.22 | 13.64 ± 2.27 | 37.21 ± 4.03e |
| 1250 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 11.11 ± 2.22 | 25.00 ± 3.94 | 55.82 ± 4.65cd | |
| 2500 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 20.0 ± 3.85 | 38.64 ± 3.94 | 67.44 ± 4.65c | |
| 5000 | 4.45 ± 2.22 | 24.4 ± 5.88 | 52.27 ± 3.93 | 81.40 ± 4.65b | |
| 10,000 | 17.78 ± 2.22 | 53.3 ± 3.85 | 77.27 ± 6.01 | 93.02 ± 0.00a | |
| NE | 625 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 4.45 ± 2.22 | 6.82 ± 2.27 | 11.63 ± 2.32gh |
| 1250 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 6.67 ± 3.85 | 11.37 ± 3.93 | 18.61 ± 2.33fg | |
| 2500 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 13.33 ± 3.85 | 25.00 ± 3.94 | 34.89 ± 2.32e | |
| 5000 | 2.22 ± 2.22 | 15.55 ± 2.22 | 31.82 ± 3.94 | 53.49 ± 2.32d | |
| 10,000 | 6.67 ± 3.85 | 26.67 ± 6.67 | 47.73 ± 6.01 | 60.47 ± 6.15cd | |
Note: PEE (petroleum ether extract); DE (dichloromethane extract); EAE (ethyl acetate extract); NE (n-butanol extract). Different letters (a–h) in the same column indicate significant differences at the level of p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test). Mortality was corrected using Abbott’s formula.
Toxicity regression equation of ethyl acetate extract and fractions on day 6.
| Extract/Factions | TRE * | LC50 (µg/mL) (95% CL) † | r # | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EAE | y = 0.6140 + 1.4463x | 1077.94 (927.46–1252.83) | 0.9948 | 0.0005 |
| Fr.1 | y = 1.2406 + 0.9305x | 10,968.79 (9340.81–12,880.50) | 0.9968 | 0.0002 |
| Fr.2 | y = 0.6119 + 1.4862x | 896.66 (576.55–1394.51) | 0.9642 | 0.0081 |
| Fr.3 | y = 0.4328 + 1.6338x | 2114.72 (1745.95–2561.37) | 0.9858 | 0.0020 |
| Fr.4 | y = 1.8511 + 1.6674x | 12,845.69 (6790.08–24,301.87) | 0.9591 | 0.0099 |
| Fr.2.1 | y = 0.2814 + 1.3418x | 8630.19 (6948.45–10,718.98) | 0.9927 | 0.0007 |
| Fr.2.2 | y = 2.5809 + 0.9076x | 462.89 (389.67–549.86) | 0.9970 | 0.0002 |
| Fr.2.3 | y = 2.7254 + 0.6768x | 2294.07 (1742.27–3020.64) | 0.9708 | 0.0060 |
| Fr.2.4 | y = 1.4135 + 0.8991x | 9746.56 (7192.64–13,207.32) | 0.9874 | 0.0017 |
| Fr.2.2.1 | y = 2.9517 + 0.6593x | 1278.95 (1026.05–1594.17) | 0.9868 | 0.0018 |
| Fr.2.2.2 | y = 3.3508 + 0.5829x | 674.87 (494.19–921.62) | 0.9861 | 0.0020 |
Note: * Toxicity regression equation. † 95% confidence interval. # Correlation coefficient. LC50 (lethal concentration that kills 50% of the larvae); EAE (ethyl acetate extract).
Figure 2Ion flow chromatogram of Fr.2.2.2.
Figure 3Analysis of No.1. (A) chromatogram of No.1. (B) parent ion and isotope. (C) The MS2 spectrum of parent ion m/z 519.18579. (D) Structure of phellamurin.
Figure 4Analysis of No.2. (A) chromatogram of No.2. (B) parent ion and isotope. (C) The MS2 spectrum of parent ion m/z 519.18597. (D) structure of rubratoxin B.
Chromatography and mass spectrometry information in the components of Fr.2.2.2.
| No. | RT (min) | Deduced Compound | Formula | Molecular Weight | Fragment Ions ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.684 | Phellamurin | C26H30O11 | 518.17839 | 365.27392, 437.15942 |
| 2 | 10.421 | Rubratoxin B | C26H30O11 | 518.17843 | 365.17410, 437.15942, |
Figure 5Morphological characters of Talaromyces purpureogenus BS5. (A) Colonies from left to right as follows: (top row) MEA, OA, YES, DG18, CYA and CREA obverse view; (bottom row) MEA, OA, YES, DG18, CYA and CREA reverse view. (B) Diagram of OM (Optical Microscope). (C–E) Diagram of SEM (Scanning Electron Microscope).
Figure 6The Maximum Likelihood method phylogram yielded from ITS sequence data set.
Figure 7The Maximum Likelihood method phylogram yielded from partial β-tubulin sequence data set.