Literature DB >> 30121788

Relationship between skeletal muscle function, body composition, and weight loss in patients with advanced pancreatic and gastrointestinal cancers.

P Cresta Morgado1, M Daud2, M Carballido3, G Méndez3, S Iseas3, V Lobbe4, G De Simone2,5, A Navigante6,7,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Muscle function and its correlation with body composition and weight loss have not been studied deeply in pancreas and gastrointestinal cancers. This research aims to determine the skeletal muscle function and its relationship with body compartments, significant weight loss, and performance status (ECOG) 0-2 in a population with advanced digestive cancers.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was designed to determine the relationship between muscular function, weight loss, and body composition. Patients with advanced digestive adenocarcinomas were evaluated. Muscle strength was examined by hand grip technique and body composition by bioimpedance analysis. Values of hemoglobin and albumin were measured in plasma.
RESULTS: A sample of 81 patients was included. They had adenocarcinoma of stomach (n = 9), pancreas (n = 28), or colorectum (n = 44). With regard to skeletal muscle function, sub-maximal strength increased when percentage of weight loss decreased (p = 0.002) or when any of the following variables increased: skeletal muscle (p < 0.001), waist-hip ratio (p < 0.001), body surface area (p < 0.001), and body mass index (p = 0.001). According to multivariate analysis of these variables, only percentage of weight loss and skeletal muscle remained statistically significant. Endurance had no correlation with any of the variables. Higher weight loss was found in tumors of the upper tract (stomach and pancreas) in comparison with those of the lower tract (colorectal) (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: In advanced digestive cancer, sub-maximal strength correlated inversely with weight loss and directly with skeletal muscle such as in lung and head and neck cancers. On the other hand, endurance had no correlation with any of the variables considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body composition; Digestive cancers; Muscle strength; Weight loss

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30121788     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4421-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  28 in total

Review 1.  Understanding, recognizing, and managing toxicities of targeted anticancer therapies.

Authors:  Grace K Dy; Alex A Adjei
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Muscling In on Cancer.

Authors:  Alejandro Lucia; Manuel Ramírez
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Body composition in chemotherapy: the promising role of CT scans.

Authors:  Carla M M Prado
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.294

4.  A predictive model of inflammatory markers and patient-reported symptoms for cachexia in newly diagnosed pancreatic cancer patients.

Authors:  David R Fogelman; J Morris; L Xiao; M Hassan; S Vadhan; M Overman; S Javle; R Shroff; G Varadhachary; R Wolff; L Vence; A Maitra; C Cleeland; X S Wang
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Relationship between weakness and phase angle in advanced cancer patients with fatigue.

Authors:  A Navigante; P Cresta Morgado; O Casbarien; N López Delgado; R Giglio; M Perman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Relationship between weight loss and parameters of skeletal muscle function in patients with advanced cancer and fatigue.

Authors:  P Cresta Morgado; A Giorlando; M Castro; A Navigante
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Patients' views about causes and preferences for the management of cancer-related fatigue-a case for non-congruence with the physicians?

Authors:  Christophe Luthy; Christine Cedraschi; Angela Pugliesi; Katie Di Silvestro; Beatrice Mugnier-Konrad; Elisabetta Rapiti; Anne-Francoise Allaz
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Cancer cachexia: mechanisms and clinical implications.

Authors:  Claire L Donohoe; Aoife M Ryan; John V Reynolds
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 2.260

9.  Body composition, symptoms, and survival in advanced cancer patients referred to a phase I service.

Authors:  Henrique A Parsons; Vickie E Baracos; Navjot Dhillon; David S Hong; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Highlights from the 9th Cachexia Conference.

Authors:  Nicole Ebner; Stephan von Haehling
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 12.910

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Relationship between Nutritional Status and Body Composition with Clinical Parameters, Tumor Stage, CA19-9, CEA Levels in Patients with Pancreatic and Periampullary Tumors.

Authors:  Aneta Jachnis; Maciej Tomasz Słodkowski
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Association of handgrip strength and endurance with body composition in head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Vengadesan Kowshik; Subramanian Velkumary; Pooja Sethi; Jothi Marie Feula; Soundirarajan Subhashri; Manikandan Abirami
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-02-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.