Literature DB >> 23321933

Relationship between weakness and phase angle in advanced cancer patients with fatigue.

A Navigante1, P Cresta Morgado, O Casbarien, N López Delgado, R Giglio, M Perman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the relationship between weakness and bioimpedance analysis (BIA)-derived phase angle in a population of untreated cancer patients with fatigue.
METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 41 treatment-naive cancer patients of several origins that presented with performance status 1-2, weight loss >5% in the last 6 months, and Fatigue Numeral Scale score >4. Weakness was considered a physical component of the multidimensional fatigue syndrome and was evaluated through several parameters utilizing hand grip strength technique by dinamometry. The same assessment was also performed on a healthy control population (n = 20). BIA-derived phase angle was also determined by BIA.
RESULTS: Compared to healthy controls, cancer patients exhibited significant differences in all the parameters: median fatigue was 6 (range 5-9), evaluated maximal strength mean was 27 ± 10.71 vs. 42 ± 10.74 kg (p < 0.0001 for patients vs. control, respectively), and muscle strength difference (max-min muscle strength) was also statistically different (p < 0.0001). We also determined parameter associations within the patient population. We found statistical significant correlations between median phase angle score and endurance muscle with percentage of weight loss (r = 0.43, p = 0.03) for head and neck cancer patients, and in non-small cell lung cancer patients, grip work correlated significantly with normal or decreased phase angle (r = 0.85), p = 0.006 (Spearman Rank Correlation).
CONCLUSIONS: Weakness could be correlated with normal or decreased phase angle in a population with ambulatory advanced cancer with fatigue naive of treatment. We also found a significant relationship between median phase angle score and endurance muscle with percentage of weight loss in the subpopulation of patients with head and neck carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23321933     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-012-1714-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  30 in total

1.  Muscle volume is a major determinant of joint torque in humans.

Authors:  T Fukunaga; M Miyatani; M Tachi; M Kouzaki; Y Kawakami; H Kanehisa
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  2001-08

2.  Identification of factors associated with fatigue in advanced cancer: a subset analysis of the European palliative care research collaborative computerized symptom assessment data set.

Authors:  Ollie Minton; Florian Strasser; Lukas Radbruch; Patrick Stone
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Mechanism of attenuation of skeletal muscle protein catabolism in cancer cachexia by eicosapentaenoic acid.

Authors:  A S Whitehouse; H J Smith; J L Drake; M J Tisdale
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  Fatigue in cancer patients: a review of the literature.

Authors:  A Richardson
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.520

5.  What's in a Name? Word descriptors of cancer-related fatigue.

Authors:  Katherine Hauser; Lisa Rybicki; Declan Walsh
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 6.  Nutritional support for malnourished patients with cancer.

Authors:  Christine Baldwin
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.302

7.  Evaluation of handgrip strength as a nutritional marker and prognostic indicator in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Angela Yee-Moon Wang; Mandy Man-Mei Sea; Zoe So-Ying Ho; Siu-Fai Lui; Philip Kam-Tao Li; Jean Woo
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 8.  Evidence-based recommendations for cancer fatigue, anorexia, depression, and dyspnea.

Authors:  Sydney M Dy; Karl A Lorenz; Arash Naeim; Homayoon Sanati; Anne Walling; Steven M Asch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Diagnostic criteria of cachexia and their assessment: decreased muscle strength and fatigue.

Authors:  Florian Strasser
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.294

10.  Patients' views about causes and preferences for the management of cancer-related fatigue-a case for non-congruence with the physicians?

Authors:  Christophe Luthy; Christine Cedraschi; Angela Pugliesi; Katie Di Silvestro; Beatrice Mugnier-Konrad; Elisabetta Rapiti; Anne-Francoise Allaz
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 3.603

View more
  9 in total

1.  Relationship between skeletal muscle function, body composition, and weight loss in patients with advanced pancreatic and gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  P Cresta Morgado; M Daud; M Carballido; G Méndez; S Iseas; V Lobbe; G De Simone; A Navigante
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Phase angle is not associated with fatigue in cancer patients: the hydration impact.

Authors:  Tatyanne L N Gomes; Jéssika D P Soares; Thaís C Borges; Claude Pichard; Gustavo D Pimentel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 3.  Cancer, Phase Angle and Sarcopenia: The Role of Diet in Connection with Lung Cancer Prognosis.

Authors:  Paraskevi Detopoulou; Gavriela Voulgaridou; Sousana Papadopoulou
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 2.584

4.  Relationship between weight loss and parameters of skeletal muscle function in patients with advanced cancer and fatigue.

Authors:  P Cresta Morgado; A Giorlando; M Castro; A Navigante
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Influence of Hemoglobin Level on Muscle and Physical Functions, Activities of Daily Living, and Quality of Life in Patients With Hematological Malignancies.

Authors:  Takuya Fukushima; Jiro Nakano; Shun Ishii; Ayumi Natsuzako; Haruna Kawachi; Junya Sakamoto; Yasushi Miyazaki; Minoru Okita
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.279

Review 6.  Bioelectrical Phase Angle in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Delia Morlino; Iolanda Cioffi; Maurizio Marra; Olivia Di Vincenzo; Luca Scalfi; Fabrizio Pasanisi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  Phase Angle, a Cornerstone of Outcome in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Daniel Sat-Muñoz; Brenda-Eugenia Martínez-Herrera; Javier-Andrés González-Rodríguez; Leonardo-Xicotencatl Gutiérrez-Rodríguez; Benjamín Trujillo-Hernández; Luis-Aarón Quiroga-Morales; Aldo-Antonio Alcaráz-Wong; Carlos Dávalos-Cobián; Alejandro Solórzano-Meléndez; Juan-Daniel Flores-Carlos; Benjamín Rubio-Jurado; Mario Salazar-Páramo; Gabriela-Guadalupe Carrillo-Nuñez; Eduardo Gómez-Sánchez; Arnulfo-Hernán Nava-Zavala; Luz-Ma-Adriana Balderas-Peña
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-07-24       Impact factor: 6.706

8.  Effects of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation on Phase Angle and Physical Function in Patients with Prostate Cancer on ADT.

Authors:  Julia E Inglis; Isabel D Fernandez; Edwin van Wijngaarden; Eva Culakova; Jennifer E Reschke; Amber S Kleckner; Po-Ju Lin; Karen M Mustian; Luke J Peppone
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.900

9.  Phase Angle as a Biomarker for Frailty and Postoperative Mortality: The BICS Study.

Authors:  Louis Mullie; Alexandrine Obrand; Melissa Bendayan; Amanda Trnkus; Marie-Claude Ouimet; Emmanuel Moss; Annabel Chen-Tournoux; Lawrence G Rudski; Jonathan Afilalo
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 5.501

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.