Literature DB >> 30120544

Change detection in complex auditory scenes is predicted by auditory memory, pitch perception, and years of musical training.

Christina M Vanden Bosch der Nederlanden1,2, Che'Renee Zaragoza3, Angie Rubio-Garcia3, Evan Clarkson3, Joel S Snyder3.   

Abstract

Our world is a sonically busy place and we use both acoustic information and experience-based knowledge to make sense of the sounds arriving at our ears. The knowledge we gain through experience has the potential to shape what sounds are prioritized in a complex scene. There are many examples of how visual expertise influences how we perceive objects in visual scenes, but few studies examine how auditory expertise is associated with attentional biases toward familiar real-world sounds in complex scenes. In the current study, we investigated whether musical expertise is associated with the ability to detect changes to real-world sounds in complex auditory scenes, and whether any such benefit is specific to musical instrument sounds. We also examined whether change detection is better for human-generated sounds in general or only communicative human sounds. We found that musicians had less change deafness overall. All listeners were better at detecting human communicative sounds compared to human non-communicative sounds, but this benefit was driven by speech sounds and sounds that were vocally generated. Musical listening skill, speech-in-noise, and executive function abilities were used to predict rates of change deafness. Auditory memory, musical training, fine-grained pitch processing, and an interaction between training and pitch processing accounted for 45.8% of the variance in change deafness. To better understand perceptual and cognitive expertise, it may be more important to measure various auditory skills and relate them to each other, as opposed to comparing experts to non-experts.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30120544     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-018-1072-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  70 in total

1.  Gray matter differences between musicians and nonmusicians.

Authors:  Christian Gaser; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Concurrent sound segregation is enhanced in musicians.

Authors:  Benjamin Rich Zendel; Claude Alain
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Familiarity, expertise, and change detection: change deafness is worse in your native language.

Authors:  John G Neuhoff; Steven A Schott; Adam J Kropf; Emily M Neuhoff
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Assessing musical ability quickly and objectively: development and validation of the Short-PROMS and the Mini-PROMS.

Authors:  Marcel Zentner; Hannah Strauss
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Explaining the association between music training and reading in adults.

Authors:  Swathi Swaminathan; E Glenn Schellenberg; Kirthika Venkatesan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 6.  Music training and speech perception: a gene-environment interaction.

Authors:  E Glenn Schellenberg
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Change deafness and object encoding with recognizable and unrecognizable sounds.

Authors:  Melissa K Gregg; Vanessa C Irsik; Joel S Snyder
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Relating pitch awareness to phonemic awareness in children: implications for tone-deafness and dyslexia.

Authors:  Psyche Loui; Kenneth Kroog; Jennifer Zuk; Ellen Winner; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-05-30

9.  Influence of musical training on understanding voiced and whispered speech in noise.

Authors:  Dorea R Ruggles; Richard L Freyman; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Assessing musical abilities objectively: construction and validation of the profile of music perception skills.

Authors:  Lily N C Law; Marcel Zentner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  No Evidence That Music Training Benefits Speech Perception in Hearing-Impaired Listeners: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Colette M McKay
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.