Literature DB >> 24937187

Change deafness and object encoding with recognizable and unrecognizable sounds.

Melissa K Gregg1, Vanessa C Irsik2, Joel S Snyder2.   

Abstract

Change deafness is the failure to notice changes in an auditory scene. In this study, we sought to determine if change deafness is a perceptual error, rather than only a reflection of verbal memory limitations. We also examined how successful encoding of objects within a scene is related to successful detection of changes. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while listeners completed a change-detection and an object-encoding task with scenes composed of recognizable sounds or unrecognizable temporally scrambled versions of the recognizable sounds. More change deafness occurred for the unrecognizable, compared to recognizable sounds, indicating that change deafness is a perceptual error and not solely a product of verbal memory. ERPs from both the recognizable and unrecognizable scenes revealed an enhanced P3b (at PZ/1/2, POZ/3/4 from 350 to 750ms) to detected changes, a marker that conscious change detection has occurred. Recognizable scenes resulted in an enhanced T400 (at T8/TP8, C6/CP6 from 315 to 660ms) to detected changes, possibly indicating activation of established memory representations. Unrecognizable scenes elicited an enhanced P3a (at FCZ/1/2 from 280 to 600ms) to detected changes, indicating enhanced orienting to acoustic change. Performance on the object-encoding task revealed that change deafness was reduced, but not eliminated, when performance on the object-encoding task was accurate.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory scene analysis; Change deafness; Change detection; Event-related potentials

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24937187     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  7 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in exploring the neural underpinnings of auditory scene perception.

Authors:  Joel S Snyder; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 2.  A roadmap for the study of conscious audition and its neural basis.

Authors:  Andrew R Dykstra; Peter A Cariani; Alexander Gutschalk
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Change detection in complex auditory scenes is predicted by auditory memory, pitch perception, and years of musical training.

Authors:  Christina M Vanden Bosch der Nederlanden; Che'Renee Zaragoza; Angie Rubio-Garcia; Evan Clarkson; Joel S Snyder
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-17

4.  Change deafness can be reduced, but not eliminated, using brief training interventions.

Authors:  Vanessa C Irsik; Joel S Snyder
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-09-06

Review 5.  Did you hear that? The role of stimulus similarity and uncertainty in auditory change deafness.

Authors:  Kelly Dickerson; Jeremy R Gaston
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-02

6.  Change deafness for real spatialized environmental scenes.

Authors:  Jeremy Gaston; Kelly Dickerson; Daniel Hipp; Peter Gerhardstein
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-06-28

7.  Neural dynamics of change detection in crowded acoustic scenes.

Authors:  Ediz Sohoglu; Maria Chait
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 6.556

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.