Literature DB >> 30118344

Mutant voltage-gated Na+ channels can exert a dominant negative effect through coupled gating.

Jérôme Clatot1, Yang Zheng1, Aurore Girardeau2, Haiyan Liu1, Kenneth R Laurita1, Céline Marionneau2, Isabelle Deschênes1.   

Abstract

Mutations in voltage-gated Na+ channels have been linked to several channelopathies leading to a wide variety of diseases including cardiac arrhythmias, epilepsy, and myotonia. We have previously demonstrated that voltage-gated Na+ channel (Nav)1.5 trafficking-deficient mutant channels could lead to a dominant negative effect by impairing trafficking of the wild-type (WT) channel. We also reported that voltage-gated Na+ channels associate as dimers with coupled gating properties. Here, we hypothesized that the dominant negative effect of mutant Na+ channels could also occur through coupled gating. This was tested using cell surface biotinylation and single channel recordings to measure the gating probability and coupled gating of the dimers. As previously reported, coexpression of Nav1.5-L325R with WT channels led to a dominant negative effect, as reflected by a 75% reduction in current density. Surprisingly, cell surface biotinylation showed that Nav1.5-L325R mutant is capable of trafficking, with 40% of Nav1.5-L325R reaching the cell surface when expressed alone. Importantly, even though a dominant negative effect on the Na+ current is observed when WT and Nav1.5-L325R are expressed together, the total Nav channel cell surface expression was not significantly altered compared with WT channels alone. Thus, the trafficking deficiency could not explain the 75% decrease in inward Na+ current. Interestingly, single channel recordings showed that Nav1.5-L325R exerted a dominant negative effect on the WT channel at the gating level. Both coupled gating and gating probability of WT:L325R dimers were drastically impaired. We conclude that dominant negative suppression exerted by Nav1.5 mutants can also be caused by impairing the WT gating probability, a mechanism resulting from the dimerization and coupled gating of voltage-gated Na+ channel α-subunits. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The presence of dominant negative mutations in the Na+ channel gene leading to Brugada syndrome was supported by our recent findings that Na+ channel α-subunits form dimers. Up until now, the dominant negative effect was thought to be caused by the interaction of the wild-type Na+ channel with trafficking-deficient mutant channels. However, the present study demonstrates that coupled gating of voltage-gated Na+ channels can also be responsible for the dominant negative effect leading to arrhythmias.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brugada syndrome; arrhythmia; channelopathies; sodium channel

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30118344      PMCID: PMC6297814          DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00721.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  14 in total

1.  Dominant-negative effect of SCN5A N-terminal mutations through the interaction of Na(v)1.5 α-subunits.

Authors:  Jérôme Clatot; Azza Ziyadeh-Isleem; Svetlana Maugenre; Isabelle Denjoy; Haiyan Liu; Gilles Dilanian; Stéphane N Hatem; Isabelle Deschênes; Alain Coulombe; Pascale Guicheney; Nathalie Neyroud
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 10.787

2.  SCN5A polymorphism restores trafficking of a Brugada syndrome mutation on a separate gene.

Authors:  Steven Poelzing; Cinzia Forleo; Melissa Samodell; Lynn Dudash; Sandro Sorrentino; Matteo Anaclerio; Rossella Troccoli; Massimo Iacoviello; Roberta Romito; Pietro Guida; Mohamed Chahine; Mariavittoria Pitzalis; Isabelle Deschênes
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  The sodium channel accessory subunit Navβ1 regulates neuronal excitability through modulation of repolarizing voltage-gated K⁺ channels.

Authors:  Céline Marionneau; Yarimar Carrasquillo; Aaron J Norris; R Reid Townsend; Lori L Isom; Andrew J Link; Jeanne M Nerbonne
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Increased coupled gating of L-type Ca2+ channels during hypertension and Timothy syndrome.

Authors:  Manuel F Navedo; Edward P Cheng; Can Yuan; Scott Votaw; Jeffery D Molkentin; John D Scott; Luis F Santana
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  A common SCN5A polymorphism modulates the biophysical defects of SCN5A mutations.

Authors:  Krekwit Shinlapawittayatorn; Xi X Du; Haiyan Liu; Eckhard Ficker; Elizabeth S Kaufman; Isabelle Deschênes
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 6.343

6.  Brugada syndrome and fever: genetic and molecular characterization of patients carrying SCN5A mutations.

Authors:  Dagmar I Keller; Jean-Sébastien Rougier; Jan P Kucera; Nawal Benammar; Véronique Fressart; Pascale Guicheney; Alois Madle; Martin Fromer; Jürg Schläpfer; Hugues Abriel
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 10.787

7.  Genetically engineered SCN5A mutant pig hearts exhibit conduction defects and arrhythmias.

Authors:  David S Park; Marina Cerrone; Gregory Morley; Carolina Vasquez; Steven Fowler; Nian Liu; Scott A Bernstein; Fang-Yu Liu; Jie Zhang; Christopher S Rogers; Silvia G Priori; Larry A Chinitz; Glenn I Fishman
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Brugada syndrome disease phenotype explained in apparently benign sodium channel mutations.

Authors:  Malcolm Hoshi; Xi X Du; Krekwit Shinlapawittayatorn; Haiyan Liu; Sam Chai; Xiaoping Wan; Eckhard Ficker; Isabelle Deschênes
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Genet       Date:  2014-02-26

9.  p.D1690N Nav1.5 rescues p.G1748D mutation gating defects in a compound heterozygous Brugada syndrome patient.

Authors:  Lucía Núñez; Adriana Barana; Irene Amorós; Marta González de la Fuente; Pablo Dolz-Gaitón; Ricardo Gómez; Isabel Rodríguez-García; Ignacio Mosquera; Lorenzo Monserrat; Eva Delpón; Ricardo Caballero; Alfonso Castro-Beiras; Juan Tamargo
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 6.343

10.  The β1-subunit of Na(v)1.5 cardiac sodium channel is required for a dominant negative effect through α-α interaction.

Authors:  Aurélie Mercier; Romain Clément; Thomas Harnois; Nicolas Bourmeyster; Jean-François Faivre; Ian Findlay; Mohamed Chahine; Patrick Bois; Aurélien Chatelier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  16 in total

1.  Dominant negative effects of SCN5A missense variants.

Authors:  Matthew J O'Neill; Ayesha Muhammad; Bian Li; Yuko Wada; Lynn Hall; Joseph F Solus; Laura Short; Dan M Roden; Andrew M Glazer
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 8.864

Review 2.  Mechanisms and physiological implications of cooperative gating of clustered ion channels.

Authors:  Rose E Dixon; Manuel F Navedo; Marc D Binder; L Fernando Santana
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 46.500

3.  Modeling the Interactions Between Sodium Channels Provides Insight Into the Negative Dominance of Certain Channel Mutations.

Authors:  Echrak Hichri; Zoja Selimi; Jan P Kucera
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 4.  Sodium channelopathies of skeletal muscle and brain.

Authors:  Massimo Mantegazza; Sandrine Cestèle; William A Catterall
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 46.500

5.  Uncoupling sodium channel dimers restores the phenotype of a pain-linked Nav 1.7 channel mutation.

Authors:  Annika H Rühlmann; Jannis Körner; Ralf Hausmann; Nikolay Bebrivenski; Christian Neuhof; Silvia Detro-Dassen; Petra Hautvast; Carène A Benasolo; Jannis Meents; Jan-Philipp Machtens; Günther Schmalzing; Angelika Lampert
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  Further corroboration of distinct functional features in SCN2A variants causing intellectual disability or epileptic phenotypes.

Authors:  Anaïs Begemann; Mario A Acuña; Markus Zweier; Marie Vincent; Katharina Steindl; Ruxandra Bachmann-Gagescu; Annette Hackenberg; Lucia Abela; Barbara Plecko; Judith Kroell-Seger; Alessandra Baumer; Kazuhiro Yamakawa; Yushi Inoue; Reza Asadollahi; Heinrich Sticht; Hanns Ulrich Zeilhofer; Anita Rauch
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 6.354

7.  Cellular Mechanisms of Sinus Node Dysfunction in Carriers of the SCN5A-E161K Mutation and Role of the H558R Polymorphism.

Authors:  Ronald Wilders
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Mutations in NaV1.5 Reveal Calcium-Calmodulin Regulation of Sodium Channel.

Authors:  Eyal Nof; Leonid Vysochek; Eshcar Meisel; Elena Burashnikov; Charles Antzelevitch; Jerome Clatot; Roy Beinart; David Luria; Michael Glikson; Shimrit Oz
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  High-throughput screening against protein:protein interaction interfaces reveals anti-cancer therapeutics as potent modulators of the voltage-gated Na+ channel complex.

Authors:  Paul A Wadsworth; Oluwarotimi Folorunso; Nghi Nguyen; Aditya K Singh; Daniela D'Amico; Reid T Powell; David Brunell; John Allen; Clifford Stephan; Fernanda Laezza
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Supramolecular clustering of the cardiac sodium channel Nav1.5 in HEK293F cells, with and without the auxiliary β3-subunit.

Authors:  Samantha C Salvage; Johanna S Rees; Alexandra McStea; Michael Hirsch; Lin Wang; Christopher J Tynan; Matthew W Reed; Jennifer R Irons; Richard Butler; Andrew J Thompson; Marisa L Martin-Fernandez; Christopher L-H Huang; Antony P Jackson
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 5.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.