Matthew J O'Neill1, Ayesha Muhammad1, Bian Li2, Yuko Wada2, Lynn Hall2, Joseph F Solus2, Laura Short2, Dan M Roden3, Andrew M Glazer4. 1. Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Medical Scientist Training Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. 2. Vanderbilt Center for Arrhythmia Research and Therapeutics (VanCART), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. 3. Vanderbilt Center for Arrhythmia Research and Therapeutics (VanCART), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. 4. Vanderbilt Center for Arrhythmia Research and Therapeutics (VanCART), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. Electronic address: andrew.m.glazer@vumc.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Up to 30% of patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS) carry loss-of-function (LoF) variants in the cardiac sodium channel gene SCN5A encoding for the protein NaV1.5. Recent studies suggested that NaV1.5 can dimerize, and some variants exert dominant negative effects. In this study, we sought to explore the generality of missense variant NaV1.5 dominant negative effects and their clinical severity. METHODS: We identified 35 LoF variants (<10% of wild type [WT] peak current) and 15 partial LoF variants (10%-50% of WT peak current) that we assessed for dominant negative effects. SCN5A variants were studied in HEK293T cells, alone or in heterozygous coexpression with WT SCN5A using automated patch clamp. To assess the clinical risk, we compared the prevalence of dominant negative vs putative haploinsufficient (frameshift, splice, or nonsense) variants in a BrS consortium and the Genome Aggregation Database population database. RESULTS: In heterozygous expression with WT, 32 of 35 LoF and 6 of 15 partial LoF variants showed reduction to <75% of WT-alone peak current, showing a dominant negative effect. Individuals with dominant negative LoF variants had an elevated disease burden compared with the individuals with putative haploinsufficient variants (2.7-fold enrichment in BrS cases, P = .019). CONCLUSION: Most SCN5A missense LoF variants exert a dominant negative effect. This class of variant confers an especially high burden of BrS.
PURPOSE: Up to 30% of patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS) carry loss-of-function (LoF) variants in the cardiac sodium channel gene SCN5A encoding for the protein NaV1.5. Recent studies suggested that NaV1.5 can dimerize, and some variants exert dominant negative effects. In this study, we sought to explore the generality of missense variant NaV1.5 dominant negative effects and their clinical severity. METHODS: We identified 35 LoF variants (<10% of wild type [WT] peak current) and 15 partial LoF variants (10%-50% of WT peak current) that we assessed for dominant negative effects. SCN5A variants were studied in HEK293T cells, alone or in heterozygous coexpression with WT SCN5A using automated patch clamp. To assess the clinical risk, we compared the prevalence of dominant negative vs putative haploinsufficient (frameshift, splice, or nonsense) variants in a BrS consortium and the Genome Aggregation Database population database. RESULTS: In heterozygous expression with WT, 32 of 35 LoF and 6 of 15 partial LoF variants showed reduction to <75% of WT-alone peak current, showing a dominant negative effect. Individuals with dominant negative LoF variants had an elevated disease burden compared with the individuals with putative haploinsufficient variants (2.7-fold enrichment in BrS cases, P = .019). CONCLUSION: Most SCN5A missense LoF variants exert a dominant negative effect. This class of variant confers an especially high burden of BrS.
Authors: Connie R Bezzina; Martin B Rook; W Antoinette Groenewegen; Lucas J Herfst; Allard C van der Wal; Jan Lam; Habo J Jongsma; Arthur A M Wilde; Marcel M A M Mannens Journal: Circ Res Date: 2003-02-07 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Andrew M Glazer; Yuko Wada; Bian Li; Ayesha Muhammad; Olivia R Kalash; Matthew J O'Neill; Tiffany Shields; Lynn Hall; Laura Short; Marcia A Blair; Brett M Kroncke; John A Capra; Dan M Roden Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Kenneth A Matreyek; Jason J Stephany; Melissa A Chiasson; Nicholas Hasle; Douglas M Fowler Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2020-01-10 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: S Mohsen Hosseini; Raymond Kim; Sharmila Udupa; Gregory Costain; Rebekah Jobling; Eriskay Liston; Seema M Jamal; Marta Szybowska; Chantal F Morel; Sarah Bowdin; John Garcia; Melanie Care; Amy C Sturm; Valeria Novelli; Michael J Ackerman; James S Ware; Ray E Hershberger; Arthur A M Wilde; Michael H Gollob Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-09-18 Impact factor: 29.690