Literature DB >> 30813884

Further corroboration of distinct functional features in SCN2A variants causing intellectual disability or epileptic phenotypes.

Anaïs Begemann1,2, Mario A Acuña2,3, Markus Zweier1,2, Marie Vincent4, Katharina Steindl1,2, Ruxandra Bachmann-Gagescu1, Annette Hackenberg5, Lucia Abela2,5, Barbara Plecko2,5,6, Judith Kroell-Seger7, Alessandra Baumer1, Kazuhiro Yamakawa8, Yushi Inoue9, Reza Asadollahi1,2, Heinrich Sticht10, Hanns Ulrich Zeilhofer2,3,11,12, Anita Rauch13,14,15,16.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Deleterious variants in the voltage-gated sodium channel type 2 (Nav1.2) lead to a broad spectrum of phenotypes ranging from benign familial neonatal-infantile epilepsy (BFNIE), severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) and intellectual disability (ID) to autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Yet, the underlying mechanisms are still incompletely understood.
METHODS: To further elucidate the genotype-phenotype correlation of SCN2A variants we investigated the functional effects of six variants representing the phenotypic spectrum by whole-cell patch-clamp studies in transfected HEK293T cells and in-silico structural modeling.
RESULTS: The two variants p.L1342P and p.E1803G detected in patients with early onset epileptic encephalopathy (EE) showed profound and complex changes in channel gating, whereas the BFNIE variant p.L1563V exhibited only a small gain of channel function. The three variants identified in ID patients without seizures, p.R937C, p.L611Vfs*35 and p.W1716*, did not produce measurable currents. Homology modeling of the missense variants predicted structural impairments consistent with the electrophysiological findings.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the hypothesis that complete loss-of-function variants lead to ID without seizures, small gain-of-function variants cause BFNIE and EE variants exhibit variable but profound Nav1.2 gating changes. Moreover, structural modeling was able to predict the severity of the variant impact, supporting a potential role of structural modeling as a prognostic tool. Our study on the functional consequences of SCN2A variants causing the distinct phenotypes of EE, BFNIE and ID contributes to the elucidation of mechanisms underlying the broad phenotypic variability reported for SCN2A variants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Channelopathy; Electrophysiology; Epilepsy; Epileptic encephalopathy; Intellectual disability; Nav1.2; Patch-clamp; SCN2A; Structural modelling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30813884      PMCID: PMC6391808          DOI: 10.1186/s10020-019-0073-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Med        ISSN: 1076-1551            Impact factor:   6.354


Background

SCN2A (OMIM 182390) encodes the pore-forming α-subunit of the voltage gated sodium channel type 2 (Nav1.2). It is predominantly expressed at the axon initial segment and nodes of Ranvier of excitatory neurons of the central nervous system and plays a crucial role for axon potential initiation and propagation in early development (Kaplan et al. 2001, Kole and Stuart 2012). At age 1–2 years, it is partially replaced by Nav1.6 (encoded by SCN8A) and its main function is then thought to be related to the support of backpropagating action potentials (Hu et al. 2009, Sanders et al. 2018). Variants in SCN2A were initially identified as disease cause in patients with generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+) (Sugawara et al. 2001) and benign familial neonatal-infantile epilepsy (BFNIE) (Heron et al. 2002). In recent years, SCN2A has been recognized as one of the most frequently mutated genes in neurodevelopmental disorders including autism spectrum disorders (ASD), intellectual disability (ID), developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) and schizophrenia (Li et al. 2016). Given the broad clinical spectrum associated with pathogenic variants in this gene, understanding the genotype-phenotype correlation is a prerequisite for proper treatment and genetic counselling. To date, categorization of SCN2A variants by variant type and location allows limited prediction of the associated phenotype. Causative variants observed in BFNIE and DEE are usually missense variants clustering in the transmembrane segments and short connecting loops (Ben-Shalom et al. 2017), while more than half of the ASD-associated SCN2A variants are predicted to introduce a premature stop codon (Ben-Shalom et al. 2017). However, there are also reports of patients with nonsense, frameshift and splice site variants showing a variety of seizure types (Wolff et al. 2017). Electrophysiological analyses of about 20 pathogenic variants mostly in HEK cells and computational modeling of neuronal excitability suggest a gain of channel function and modest neuronal hyperexcitability in BFNIE, while DEE pathogenic variants show more marked and variable gating changes with pronounced hyper- or hypoexcitability predicted by in-silico modeling of six variants (Sugawara et al. 2001, Kamiya et al. 2004, Scalmani et al. 2006, Xu et al. 2007, Misra et al. 2008, Ogiwara et al. 2009, Liao, Anttonen, et al. 2010a, Liao, Deprez, et al. 2010b, Lossin et al. 2012, Lauxmann et al. 2013, Schwarz et al. 2016, Wolff et al. 2017, Berecki et al. 2018, Lauxmann et al. 2018). Gain of function variants were significantly associated with seizure onset before 3 months of age and a better response to sodium channel blockers, while loss of function variants were more often observed with later onset epilepsy and no or even adverse responses to sodium channel blockers (Wolff et al. 2017). One study investigating SCN2A variants associated with ASD (with or without seizures) in HEK cells showed partial or complete loss of channel function in all variants (Ben-Shalom et al. 2017). A recently proposed bidirectional hypothesis suggesting that gain of channel function leads to epileptic phenotypes whereas loss of channel function results in ID/ASD phenotypes (Ben-Shalom et al. 2017, Sanders et al. 2018) has been challenged by conflicting findings indicating hypoexcitability in infantile epileptic encephalopathy (EE) (Berecki et al. 2018). Therefore, characterization of additional SCN2A variants should help to improve genotype-phenotype correlation eventually enabling mechanism-based therapy (Berecki et al. 2018, Sanders et al. 2018, Ben-Shalom et al. 2017, Wolff et al. 2017). Here, we investigated the functional consequences of six SCN2A variants identified in patients with ID without seizures, early-onset EE or BFNIE using whole-cell patch-clamp experiments in HEK293T cells transiently expressing wild-type or mutant Nav1.2. Furthermore, the description of homologous structures in 2017 (Yan et al. 2017, Shen et al. 2017) allowed us to generate a 3D-model for SCN2A and assess the impact of the different variants on protein structure. We further re-evaluated the first family reported with a pathogenic SCN2A variant causing DEE (p.R102*) (Kamiya et al. 2004) which stands out as the only functionally studied truncating variant leading to DEE.

Methods

Patients and variants

Five previously reported patients carrying a pathogenic SCN2A variant (Hackenberg et al. 2014, Rauch et al. 2012, Wolff et al. 2017, Papuc et al. 2018) with a phenotype of either early-onset EE (n = 2) or ID without seizures (n = 3) were included in this study for functional and clinical evaluation. One BFNIE variant previously studied extensively by others was also investigated as a reference.

Whole exome sequencing

To re-evaluate the DEE case published by Kamiya et al. in 2004 carrying the p.R102* variant detected by targeted sequencing of SCN2A, we now performed trio whole exome sequencing (WES) of this family (see Additional file 1).

Mutagenesis and cell culture

Human SCN2A (‘adult’ isoform (Kasai et al. 2001), RefSeq NM_021007 (O’Leary et al. 2016)), SCN1B (NM_001037) and SCN2B (NM_004588) cDNA in pCMV6-XL4/5 expression vectors were purchased from OriGene (Rockville, MD, USA). Mutagenesis was performed by Creative Biolabs (Shirley, NY, USA) and verified by sequencing. HEK293T cells (ATCC-LGC Standards, Manassas, VA, USA) were grown in DMEM supplemented with 9% fetal bovine serum and 1% Pen Strep (all Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Cells were transiently transfected using Lipofectamine LTX with PLUS Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Wild-type or mutated Nav1.2 α-subunit (1 μg) was co-expressed with β1- and β2-subunits and EGFP (in a ratio of 1:1:1:0.5, respectively). Recordings were made exclusively from EGFP-positive cells.

Electrophysiology

Whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings were performed at room temperature 18–30 h after transfection using 2–4 MΩ borosilicate glass pipettes, an EPC7 amplifier and Patchmaster v2.11 software (HEKA Elektronik Dr. Schulze GmbH, Lambrecht, Germany). The pipette solution contained (in mM) 110 CsF, 10 NaF, 20 CsCl, 2 EGTA and 10 HEPES ~ 310 mOsm (pH 7.35 with CsOH). Bath solution consisted of (in mM) 145 NaCl, 4 KCl, 1.8 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2 and 10 HEPES ~ 310 mOsm (pH 7.35 with NaOH). Cells with peak current amplitudes < 0.6 nA were not used for analysis of biophysical parameters due to possible contamination with endogenous currents of HEK cells. Whole-cell capacitance was determined by integrating the area under the capacitive currents in response to a hyperpolarizing voltage step. Capacitive transients were compensated electronically. Leak currents were subtracted by use of a P/N procedure. Sodium currents were evoked by 10 ms voltage steps from − 100 mV to + 50 mV from a holding potential of − 120 mV. Current densities were obtained by dividing the peak currents by the capacitance. Charge transfer was calculated as the area under the current trace and normalized to the capacitance. Sodium conductance (GNa) was calculated as GNa = INa / (Vm − Vrev), where INa is the measured peak current at the test potential Vm, and Vrev is the calculated sodium reversal potential. To obtain activation curves (conductance-voltage relationship), the normalized conductance was plotted against the test potentials and fitted with a Boltzmann sigmoidal function for quantitative analysis. The 10–90% rise time was obtained from the I-V current traces. Fast and slow inactivation time constants were obtained by fitting a second order exponential function to the current decay of the I-V current traces. Steady-state inactivation was determined using 500 ms conditioning prepulses to potentials varying from − 130 to + 10 mV followed by a depolarizing test pulse to + 5 mV. For quantitative analysis, normalized peak currents were plotted against prepulse potential and fitted with a Boltzmann sigmoidal function. Recovery from fast inactivation was recorded by a two-pulse protocol from a holding potential of − 90 mV to + 5 mV with increasing interpulse intervals. For quantitative analyses, the curves were fitted with a first order exponential function where the tau represents the recovery time constant. To analyze use-dependent inactivation, depolarizing pulse trains from − 90 mV to + 10 mV at different frequencies were applied and the residual peak current of the last pulse was normalized to the peak current of the first pulse. Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance of differences in reference to wild-type was calculated by using the unpaired Student’s t test and a significance level of p < 0.05. Data were analyzed using NeuroMatic v2.00 (Rothman and Silver 2018) within Igor Pro 6.3 software (WaveMetrics, Portland, OR, USA) and GraphPad Prism 7.0 software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).

Protein modeling

The structure of SCN2A was modeled with Modeller 9.16 (Webb and Sali 2017) using the recently published structure of a homologous voltage-gated sodium channel (PDB: 5X0M (Shen et al. 2017)) as template. Residues 440–741 and 990–1184 were excluded from the modeling procedure because they were either absent in the template or they did not exhibit a sufficient sequence similarity between template and target sequence. RasMol (Sayle and Milner-White 1995) was used for structure analysis and visualization.

Results

Patient phenotypes and variants

Comprehensive phenotypes of our patients and bioinformatic annotations of their respective variants are presented in Table 1 and their location in the 2D-scheme of the Nav1.2 channel is depicted in Fig. 1. All missense variants affect a highly conserved amino acid and have damaging in-silico predictions.
Table 1

Molecular data and patient phenotypes

Patient 1 / IDPatient 2 / IDPatient 3 / EEPatient 4 / IDPatient 5 / EEPublished BFNIE family
Previous publicationRauch et al. 2012ER8490Rauch et al. 2012ZH60991Hackenberg et al. 2014ZH62611Wolff et al. 2017Patient 63Papuc et al. 2018ID42680Heron et al. 2002;Functional characterization by Scalmani et al. 2006,Xu et al. 2007,Misra et al. 2008,Berecki et al. 2018
Additional reports on the same variantLi et al. 2016 (due to a repeat shift described as p.D609fs), IDFunctional studies by Ben-Shalom et al. 2017Dimassi et al. 2016Matalon et al. 2014Wolff et al. 2017All EE
Type of varianthet. frameshifthet. missensehet. missensehet. stophet. missensehet. missense
Inheritancede novode novode novode novode novoInherited from a parent
cDNA levelac.1831_1832delCTc.2809C>Tc.4025T>Cc.5147G>Ac.5408A>Gc.4687C>G
Protein levelp.(L611Vfs*35)p.(R937C)p.(L1342P)p.(W1716*)p.(E1803G)p.(L1563V)
rs number (dbSNPb)unreportedrs796053197rs796053134unreportedunreportedrs121917750
Chromosomal position (hg19)chr2:166179821–166179822chr2:166201311chr2:166231247chr2:166245463chr2:166245724chr2:166243391
Allele Frequency (GnomADc)unreportedunreportedunreportedunreportedunreportedunreported
Conservationd,location in protein/high,DII S5–6high,DIII S5/high,C-terminushigh,DIV S2
Established Prediction toolse/probably damagingprobably damaging/probably damagingprobably damaging
Age at last investigation18y 1m22y 9m6y 8m24y 4m16y 4m
Gendermalefemalefemalefemalemale
Consanguinity, ethnicityno, Germanno, Swissno, Japanese/Swissno, Swissno, Swiss
Pre- or perinatal anomaliesnonenonenonenonenone
Gestational age (weeks)4140 3/738 5/7term41 1/7
Birth weight / length / HC3600 g / 52 cm / 35 cm3800 g / 51 cm / NA2970 g / 48 cm / 36 cm3150 g / NA / NA4120 g / 51 cm / NA
Intellectual disabilityyes (IQ 58)yes (IQ < 50)yes, severeyes, mildreading capital letters, calculating with numbers up to 10yes, severe
Autistic featuresyesyesNAyesNA
Other abnormal behaviorcompulsive stereotypies,autoaggressive behaviorcompulsive stereotypies,autoaggressive behaviornonerecurrent episodes of mutism and psychotic episodesnone
Developmental delayAge of indep. walkingAge of first wordsSpeech developmentyes13 m12 mSpeaks sentencesyes24 m24 mSimple sentencesyesno indep. sitting or walking-no speechyes24 mdelayedyesno indep. sitting or walking-no speech
Seizures (onset)nonenoneyes (diagnosis at 5 m)noneyes (day 3)
Seizure type//myoclonic / tonic/myoclonic / tonic
Course of epilepsy//at least 3 seizures per day, pharmacoresistant/1–7 seizures per day, pharmacoresistant
Acquired microcephalynonoyesnono
Muscle tone abnormalities, movement disordersnonehypotoniasevere hypotonia, choreoathetoticmovementsnonespasticity, bilateral contractures of knees
Dysmorphismslong face, narrow palpebral fissures, and relatively thick eyebrows, narrow palate, inverted nipples, tapering fingerslong face, narrow palpebral fissures, mild brachymetacarpalia Dig. IV-V, tapering fingersnoneNAhigh, narrow palate
Other health problemshyperopiamyopiaOSAS, scoliosis, hip dysplasia left, hip subluxation right, recurring respiratory infectionsnone reportedcortical visual impairment, gastro-jejunal tube
EEGnormalNAmultifocal sharp wave activity, hypsarrhythmianormalfrontocentral spike-wave activity on both sides, burst suppression
MRIpinealis cystNAprogressive brain atrophynormalnormal at age 4d, generalized supra- and infratentorial atrophy, bilateral hippocampal atrophy, left-sided hippocampal sclerosis and atrophy of corpus callosum at age 14y

Abb: / not relevant for this case; D domain, het heterozygous, EEG electroencephalogram, HC head circumference, m months, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, NA not available, S segment; y years

aaccording to reference sequence NM_021007

b https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP

c http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org

daccording to Alamut Visual v.2.8.1

ePolyphen2, MutationTaster, SIFT assessed by Alamut Visual v.2.8.1

Fig. 1

Schematic drawing of SCN2A indicating the location of studied pathogenic variants. The three patients with ID without seizures carried de novo heterozygous variants in SCN2A (shown in blue), two of which are nonsense variants (p.L611Vfs*35 and p.W1716*) and one is a missense variant in the pore-forming loop of domain 2 of the channel (p.R937C). The two patients with early onset EE harbored de novo heterozygous missense variants (shown in red) in the fifth transmembrane segment of the third channel domain (p.L1342P) or the C-terminal domain (p.E1803G), respectively. The heterozygous inherited missense variant previously reported by others in a family with BFNIE (Heron et al. 2002) (shown in green) is located in the second transmembrane segment of domain 4 (p.L1563V). Adapted from Meisler and Kearney (2005)

Molecular data and patient phenotypes Abb: / not relevant for this case; D domain, het heterozygous, EEG electroencephalogram, HC head circumference, m months, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, NA not available, S segment; y years aaccording to reference sequence NM_021007 b https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP c http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org daccording to Alamut Visual v.2.8.1 ePolyphen2, MutationTaster, SIFT assessed by Alamut Visual v.2.8.1 Schematic drawing of SCN2A indicating the location of studied pathogenic variants. The three patients with ID without seizures carried de novo heterozygous variants in SCN2A (shown in blue), two of which are nonsense variants (p.L611Vfs*35 and p.W1716*) and one is a missense variant in the pore-forming loop of domain 2 of the channel (p.R937C). The two patients with early onset EE harbored de novo heterozygous missense variants (shown in red) in the fifth transmembrane segment of the third channel domain (p.L1342P) or the C-terminal domain (p.E1803G), respectively. The heterozygous inherited missense variant previously reported by others in a family with BFNIE (Heron et al. 2002) (shown in green) is located in the second transmembrane segment of domain 4 (p.L1563V). Adapted from Meisler and Kearney (2005)

ID mutants are non-conducting

Representative families of whole-cell current traces of wild-type and conducting mutant channels are shown in Fig. 2a, while Fig. 2b depicts the peak current amplitude normalized by cell capacitance for wild-type and mutant Nav1.2. Recombinant Nav1.2 channels carrying variants from ID patients showed no or only small residual currents indistinguishable from endogenous HEK293T cell currents (Zhu et al. 1998, Cummins et al. 1993) (mean peak current wild-type = − 1131 ± 190 pA, n = 8; R937C = − 271 ± 46 pA, n = 9; L611Vfs*35 = − 258 ± 52 pA, n = 10; W1716* = − 253 ± 45 pA, n = 8). Thus, ID variants resulted in a complete loss of Nav1.2-mediated current. The mean peak current density of the EE and BFNIE Nav1.2 mutants did not differ significantly from the wild-type (Fig. 2b, Table 2). Striking alterations were observed in other functional characteristics as described below.
Fig. 2

Patch-clamp recordings in HEK293T cells expressing recombinant Nav1.2 wild-type or mutant channels. Variants E1803G (blue) and L1342P (green) have been detected in patients with EE, L1563V (red) in a family with BFNIE, and R937C (purple), L611Vfs*35 (orange) and W1716* (light blue) cause ID. a Family of whole-cell sodium currents of wild-type and conducting mutant Nav1.2. b Peak current amplitudes normalized to cell capacitance (bars are mean ± SEM) were not significantly different. c Voltage dependence of activation obtained by plotting the normalized conductance against test potentials and fitted with a Boltzmann function. L1342P showed a significant negative shift (p < 0.001). d Voltage dependence of steady-state inactivation obtained by displaying the normalized current amplitude against the prepulse potential fitted with a Boltzmann function. A negative shift was observed for both L1342P (p < 0.001) and L1563 V (p = 0.017), while E1803G had a shallower slope (p < 0.001). e Activation and inactivation curves of L1342P in comparison to wild-type demonstrating a hyperpolarized shift with unchanged activation-inactivation coupling. f Activation and inactivation curves of E1803G in comparison to wild-type illustrating the increase of the window current. g Time-dependent recovery from inactivation fitted with a single exponential function and plotted against a logarithmic time scale. A significantly slower recovery rate was observed in L1342P (p = 0.002). h Use-dependent inactivation. The frequencies of depolarizing pulse trains are plotted against the residual peak current amplitude of the last pulse normalized to the peak current amplitude of the first pulse. i 10–90% rise time depicted against test potentials. L1342P exhibited a significantly faster rise time at the voltage step to − 30 mV (p = 0.02). k Fast inactivation time constants plotted against test potentials

Table 2

Biophysical parameters of Nav1.2 wild-type and mutants

Peak current densityVoltage dep. of steady-state inactivationVoltage dep. of steady-state activationRecovery from inactivation10–90% rise timeFast decay time constant
Mean peak amplitude (pA/pF)nV1/2 (mV) k nV1/2 (mV) k nτrec (ms)nt at 0 mV (ms)nτfast at 0 mV (ms)n
wild-type−54.24 ± 12.608−63.53 ± 0.79−6.91 ± 0.699−23.87 ± 0.646.46 ± 0.5797.02 ± 0.8690.38 ± 0.0590.58 ± 0.079
L1342P− 108.80 ± 23.209−79.71 ± 1.18**− 8.30 ± 1.029−39.07 ± 0.82**7.25 ± 0.73915.03 ± 2.18*60.26 ± 0.0390.51 ± 0.069
E1803G−53.48 ± 12.288−60.90 ± 1.87−12.35 ± 1.00**8−23.61 ± 0.887.38 ± 0.78810.04 ± 1.9170.48 ± 0.0870.90 ± 0.117
L1563V−90.55 ± 20.976−59.77 ± 1.21*−8.75 ± 1.076−25.17 ± 0.615.37 ± 0.5366.05 ± 1.2760.40 ± 0.0660.66 ± 0.086

Values significantly different from wild-type are indicated as follows ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.001

Patch-clamp recordings in HEK293T cells expressing recombinant Nav1.2 wild-type or mutant channels. Variants E1803G (blue) and L1342P (green) have been detected in patients with EE, L1563V (red) in a family with BFNIE, and R937C (purple), L611Vfs*35 (orange) and W1716* (light blue) cause ID. a Family of whole-cell sodium currents of wild-type and conducting mutant Nav1.2. b Peak current amplitudes normalized to cell capacitance (bars are mean ± SEM) were not significantly different. c Voltage dependence of activation obtained by plotting the normalized conductance against test potentials and fitted with a Boltzmann function. L1342P showed a significant negative shift (p < 0.001). d Voltage dependence of steady-state inactivation obtained by displaying the normalized current amplitude against the prepulse potential fitted with a Boltzmann function. A negative shift was observed for both L1342P (p < 0.001) and L1563 V (p = 0.017), while E1803G had a shallower slope (p < 0.001). e Activation and inactivation curves of L1342P in comparison to wild-type demonstrating a hyperpolarized shift with unchanged activation-inactivation coupling. f Activation and inactivation curves of E1803G in comparison to wild-type illustrating the increase of the window current. g Time-dependent recovery from inactivation fitted with a single exponential function and plotted against a logarithmic time scale. A significantly slower recovery rate was observed in L1342P (p = 0.002). h Use-dependent inactivation. The frequencies of depolarizing pulse trains are plotted against the residual peak current amplitude of the last pulse normalized to the peak current amplitude of the first pulse. i 10–90% rise time depicted against test potentials. L1342P exhibited a significantly faster rise time at the voltage step to − 30 mV (p = 0.02). k Fast inactivation time constants plotted against test potentials Biophysical parameters of Nav1.2 wild-type and mutants Values significantly different from wild-type are indicated as follows ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.001

The EE mutant L1342P shows a hyperpolarizing shift of activation and inactivation curves

Voltage-dependent activation and inactivation curves of L1342P exhibited a hyperpolarizing shift of about 15 mV relative to wild-type (Fig. 2c-e, Table 2). Furthermore, this mutant showed a slower recovery time constant from inactivation (Fig. 2g, Table 2) and a trend towards faster rise time kinetics, although reaching significance only at − 30 mV (Fig. 2i, Additional file 1: Table S1). Differences in the current density, decay kinetics and use-dependent inactivation were not statistically significant (Fig. 2b, h and k, Table 2, Additional file 1: Table S2). Therefore, this mutant showed mixed gain and loss of function effects.

The EE mutant E1803G exhibits a shallower slope of the inactivation curve that leads to an increased window current

While no changes in voltage dependence of activation were observed for the mutant E1803G compared to wild-type, the slope of the voltage dependence of inactivation was significantly less steep (Fig. 2c-d, Table 2), leading to a larger overlap of activation and inactivation curves. This increased window current suggests the presence of a persistent current at membrane voltages between − 45 to − 25 mV (Fig. 2f). Additionally, the E1803G mutant tended to have slower activation and inactivation kinetics (Fig. 2i-k, Additional file 1: Table S1) and hence tended to let more charge pass compared to wild-type channels (mean charge transfer normalized to conductance at a test potential of − 10 mV: wild-type = 0.09 ± 0.02 C/F, n = 8; E1803G = 0.16 ± 0.03 C/F, n = 8; p = 0.092). The use-dependent inactivation was similar to wild-type (Fig. 2h, Additional file 1: Table S2). The larger window current may increase neuronal excitability and thereby promote the presence of epileptic seizures in affected patients.

The BFNIE mutant L1563V exhibits a small depolarizing shift of the inactivation curves

Activation, recovery from inactivation, kinetics and use-dependent inactivation did not show relevant differences between L1563V and wild-type channels (Fig. 2, Table 2 and Additional file 1: Tables S1–2). However, the inactivation curve was slightly but significantly shifted by about 4 mV in the depolarizing direction (Fig. 2d, Table 2), which suggests a small gain of channel function.

Structural modeling of the ID variant R937C predicts a destabilizing effect on the selectivity filter

The α-subunits of voltage-gated sodium channels contain four homologous repeats, which contribute to the formation of one central pore region (Fig. 3a-b). The SCN2A pore region contains the typical DEKA motif, which is formed by four conserved Asp/Glu/Lys/Ala residues (Fig. 3c). These residues represent the sodium selectivity filter and are therefore crucial for channel function (Shen et al. 2017). The position of one of these residues (E942) is stabilized by electrostatic interactions with the adjacent R937 (Fig. 3d). In the R937C variant these interactions cannot be formed by the shorter and uncharged cysteine sidechain resulting in a less defined position of the E942 sidechain. These structural changes offer an explanation for the electrophysiologically observed loss of conductance.
Fig. 3

Effect of amino acid exchanges on the SCN2A structure. a Top view on a model of the SCN2A structure. The four homologous repeats are shown in different colors (blue, cyan, orange, red) and the III-IV domain linker is shown in purple. The site of the pore is marked by a black diamond and the positions of the missense variants investigated in the present study are indicated. The extracellular sequence stretch spanning residues 275–359 has been omitted for clarity. b Side-view on the SCN2A structure. Color coding as in (a). c Model of the SCN2A pore region. The four residues that are critical for Na+ selectivity are shown in stick presentation. d In the wild-type SCN2A (left panel) the sidechain orientation of E942, which is part of the selectivity filter, is stabilized by polar interactions with R937 (see encircled region). These interactions cannot be formed in the R937C variant (right panel) by the shorter and uncharged cysteine sidechain thus impeding fixation of the E942 sidechain (flexibility is indicated by the magenta arrow). e E1803 forms interactions with residues Q1510 and P1512 of the III-IV domain linker, which cannot be formed in the (f) E1803G variant. The lacking interactions are highlighted by a blue dotted circle. g L1342 forms sidechain interactions with W864 of the adjacent repeat. h In the L1342P variant, these interactions cannot be formed by the less-extended proline sidechain. i L1563 forms hydrophobic interactions within the fourth domain. k These interactions are partially lost in the L1563V variant by the shorter valine sidechain (indicated by a blue dotted circle)

Effect of amino acid exchanges on the SCN2A structure. a Top view on a model of the SCN2A structure. The four homologous repeats are shown in different colors (blue, cyan, orange, red) and the III-IV domain linker is shown in purple. The site of the pore is marked by a black diamond and the positions of the missense variants investigated in the present study are indicated. The extracellular sequence stretch spanning residues 275–359 has been omitted for clarity. b Side-view on the SCN2A structure. Color coding as in (a). c Model of the SCN2A pore region. The four residues that are critical for Na+ selectivity are shown in stick presentation. d In the wild-type SCN2A (left panel) the sidechain orientation of E942, which is part of the selectivity filter, is stabilized by polar interactions with R937 (see encircled region). These interactions cannot be formed in the R937C variant (right panel) by the shorter and uncharged cysteine sidechain thus impeding fixation of the E942 sidechain (flexibility is indicated by the magenta arrow). e E1803 forms interactions with residues Q1510 and P1512 of the III-IV domain linker, which cannot be formed in the (f) E1803G variant. The lacking interactions are highlighted by a blue dotted circle. g L1342 forms sidechain interactions with W864 of the adjacent repeat. h In the L1342P variant, these interactions cannot be formed by the less-extended proline sidechain. i L1563 forms hydrophobic interactions within the fourth domain. k These interactions are partially lost in the L1563V variant by the shorter valine sidechain (indicated by a blue dotted circle)

Structural modeling of the EE variant E1803G supports altered inactivation properties

Residue E1803 is located in the globular C-terminal domain of SCN2A and forms sidechain interactions with two residues of the III-IV domain linker, which cannot be formed in the E1803G variant (Fig. 3e-f). The III-IV linker plays a key role for fast inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels (Shen et al. 2017, Yan et al. 2017) suggesting that an altered interaction with adjacent domains, as observed for the E1803G variant, might affect inactivation properties.

The EE variant L1342P is predicted to disturb interactions with the adjacent S4-S5 linker

Residue L1342 is located in helix S4 and the effect of a L1342P exchange has been assessed previously based on the isolated helix (Hackenberg et al. 2014) due to the lack of a homologous 3D-structure at that time. This previous study revealed the lack of a backbone hydrogen bond in the mutant resulting in helix destabilization (Hackenberg et al. 2014). The availability of homologous structures in 2017 (Yan et al. 2017, Shen et al. 2017) allowed the generation of a complete 3D-model for SCN2A and a more comprehensive evaluation of the effects of the L1342P variant. An inspection of the SCN2A model reveals that L1342 forms sidechain interactions with W864, which is located in the S4-S5 linker of the adjacent repeat (Fig. 3g). These interactions cannot be formed in the L1342P variant because the cyclic proline sidechain cannot adopt an extended conformation required for W864 interaction (Fig. 3h). Based on this significant structural disturbance and the observation that a number of disease-related variants of Nav channels mapped to the interface between S4 and S5 segments in the neighboring repeats (Shen et al. 2017, Huang et al. 2017), L1342P is also likely to affect the biophysical properties of SCN2A.

Hydrophobic interactions within the fourth domain are expected to be diminished in the L1563V BFNIE variant

Residue L1563 is located in helix S2 of the fourth voltage-sensing domain and forms hydrophobic sidechain interactions in the core of the domain (Fig. 3i). In the L1563V variant some of these hydrophobic interactions are lost due to the shorter valine sidechain, but the overall packing of helices S1 and S2 remains unaffected (Fig. 3k). Thus, this amino acid change is expected to have only a moderate effect on the local structure of the fourth domain.

Trio WES in the published DEE patient carrying the R102* variant did not reveal a second hit

The p.R102* variant is to date the only functionally evaluated protein truncating SCN2A variant that leads to an encephalopathic phenotype with seizures (Kamiya et al. 2004). The reported patch-clamp studies showed a complete loss of channel function for this variant. This patient was reported to exhibit intractable seizures with an onset at age 1y 7m, ASD and severe ID. However, the mother was also reported to have suffered from recurrent febrile seizures until the age of 6y, suggesting the possibility of a second, maternally inherited variant in an epilepsy gene to cause the seizures in the patient and her mother while the de novo truncating SCN2A variant could explain the ASD/ID phenotype. This hypothesis is further supported by a recent report of a second patient carrying this variant (Monies et al. 2017) with a phenotype of severe ID and ASD but no seizures at the age of 6.5 years (personal communication Fowzan S. Alkuraya). To re-evaluate this case, we performed WES in the patient and her parents and filtered for dominant maternally inherited and recessive rare variants in known epilepsy and ID genes, as well as de novo variants. However, we did not detect a likely pathogenic sequence or copy number variant in any known epilepsy gene other than the already known SCN2A de novo variant.

Discussion

All three variants from patients with ID without seizures studied here showed a complete loss of Nav1.2-mediated currents. While the truncating variant L611Vfs*35 is likely to result in nonsense mediated mRNA decay (NMD) in vivo, the stop variant W1716* is located in the last exon and the mRNA should therefore not be subject to NMD (Sanders et al. 2018), but is expected to direct the synthesis of a C-terminally truncated protein. Thus, the complete loss of function in this mutant must be due to other mechanisms such as protein instability or disturbed transport. In line with this concept, Ben-Shalom et al. (2017) showed that in all three investigated truncating SCN2A variants no channel could be detected in the membrane of overexpressing HEK293 cells by immunocytochemistry. Of note, multiple variants truncating the protein at later positions (E1777, K1863, I1877) have also been reported to result in complete loss of conductance (Mantegazza et al. 2001). It was less apparent how the missense variant R937C caused a complete loss of function, as the R937C mutant protein has been previously shown to be correctly located in the cell membrane (Ben-Shalom et al. 2017). Its critical location in the pore loop let us speculate that the pore could be completely blocked by the amino acid substitution. Our homology model supports this idea, predicting that R937 stabilizes the glutamate residue which is an essential part of the selectivity filter of Nav1.2. The same structural mechanism also applies to the previously described R937H variant causing ASD, which also exhibited no sodium flux (Ben-Shalom et al. 2017). Interestingly, two other variants for which no or reduced sodium conductance was reported (Ben-Shalom et al. 2017) are also located in the immediate vicinity of the DEKA selectivity filter (Fig. 3c). R379H is located near D384 and T1420M near K1422 of the selectivity filter. Thus, it is likely that these variants interfere with sodium permeability by a mechanism similar to that deduced above for the R937C variant. To date, only one other study has functionally evaluated SCN2A variants with a non-epileptic phenotype (Additional file 1: Table S3) (Ben-Shalom et al. 2017). In their analysis of variants associated with ASD, all truncating variants and most missense variants were non-conducting, including R937C also investigated in our study. Notably, all non-conducting variants were detected in patients without additional seizures. Both variants causing a phenotype of EE led to profound changes of Nav1.2 channel function. While L1342P affected several gating properties, E1803G mainly showed an increased window current caused by a shallower slope of the inactivation curve. So far, 10 SCN2A variants detected in EE patients have been studied electrophysiologically (Additional file 1: Table S3) (Kamiya et al. 2004, Ogiwara et al. 2009, Liao, Anttonen, et al. 2010, Lossin et al. 2012, Wolff et al. 2017, Berecki et al. 2018, Lauxmann et al. 2018). Two of them, E1211K and R1312T, exhibited gating changes similar to the ones observed in our mutant L1342P with a negative shift in both activation and inactivation curves and slowed recovery from inactivation (Ogiwara et al. 2009, Lossin et al. 2012). Interpretation based on these profoundly altered biophysical properties alone is challenging. However, a computational model of a cortical pyramidal neuron carrying the E1211K variant showed a marked neuronal hyperexcitability with a hyperpolarized spike threshold and an increased spike rate (Additional file 1: Table S4) (Ben-Shalom et al. 2017). We therefore also assume an increase in excitability for neurons carrying the L1342P variant. To date, three other patients carrying the de novo variant L1342P have been reported (Matalon et al. 2014, Dimassi et al. 2016, Wolff et al. 2017). All four affected patients share a common phenotype with an early seizure onset between age 3 to 6 months, severe ID, muscle tone abnormalities, (progressive) brain atrophy in MRI, and no eye contact (3/4) or cortical visual impairment (1/4). The seizures were intractable in 3/4 patients, and the EEG showed hypsarrhythmia in all three patients where EEG was reported and multifocal epileptic activity in 2/3. Acquired microcephaly and choreiform movements were noted in 2/4 patients. Several missense variants located in the cytoplasmic C-terminal domain (CTD) leading to EE have been reported (Ben-Shalom et al. 2017). Interestingly, the only functionally studied variant, R1882Q, was found to have altered activation and inactivation curves leading to an increased window current, similar to our findings for E1803G. Our structural model predicts that the contacts between the CTD and the inactivation gate are disturbed (Fig. 3e-f), providing a mechanistic explanation for the altered inactivation properties observed in the E1803G mutant. Interestingly, gating changes leading to a persistent current seem to be a recurrent pathomechanism for SCN2A variants detected in EE patients, as this dysfunction has also been described previously as the mechanism of disease for the EE variants A263V (Liao, Anttonen, et al. 2010a) and V423L (Wolff et al. 2017). This pathomechanism was also observed in hippocampal pyramidal neurons of a Q54 transgenic mouse model carrying a gain-of-function Scn2a variant and showing a progressive epilepsy phenotype (Kearney et al. 2001). Persistent currents have been found to substantially influence action potential thresholds in axons and are considered to be important for generation of high-frequency action potential bursts in axons and nodes of Ranvier, the main expression sites of Nav1.2 (Kole and Stuart 2012). Most previous electrophysiological studies of BFNIE variants reported a gain-of-function effect, assuming hyperexcitability as the mechanism of disease (Additional file 1: Table S3) (Scalmani et al. 2006, Xu et al. 2007, Misra et al. 2008, Liao, Deprez, et al. 2010b, Lauxmann et al. 2013, Lauxmann et al. 2018, Berecki et al. 2018). Our results for the recurrent BFNIE variant L1563V of a small but significant depolarizing shift of the inactivation curve expected to result in a small gain-of-function are in line with previous studies of this variant (Scalmani et al. 2006, Xu et al. 2007, Misra et al. 2008, Berecki et al. 2018). Consistent with the small effect size, molecular modeling (Fig. 3i-k) showed that the L1563V exchange causes only a small perturbation of the SCN2A structure. In BFNIE, seizures are thought to be self-limited due to the developmental regulation of sodium channels with Nav1.2 being partially substituted by Nav1.6 (Liao, Deprez, et al. 2010b, Lauxmann et al. 2013, Sanders et al. 2018), while the more pronounced impact of DEE variants on gating properties also observed in this study suggests continued disturbance of neuronal function (Ben-Shalom et al. 2017). Our study of six SCN2A variants representing the phenotypic variability known for this gene supports the association of their respective functional impact with the observed patient phenotype. Our data corroborates the assumption that 1) a loss of channel function caused by de novo truncating or missense variants is the underlying mechanism that leads to ID 2) benign epilepsy is due to usually inherited missense variants that lead to a small but relevant gain of channel function and 3) epileptic encephalopathies are the result of profound and lasting gating changes due to de novo missense variants (Ben-Shalom et al. 2017, Sanders et al. 2018, Berecki et al. 2018). Additionally, we suggest that a complete loss of Nav1.2 conductance is associated with ID/ASD without seizures, as supported by our own data and the results reported by Ben-Shalom et al. (2017), although like in our study long-term follow-up is required since seizures may appear later in childhood. This assumption is in line with data from a heterozygous knock-out mouse model which did not show a seizure phenotype (Planells-Cases et al. 2000, Middleton et al. 2018). However, another study on knock-out mouse models despite the absence of behavioral seizures showed very short absence seizures-like patterns in electrocorticography (Ogiwara et al. 2018), and multiple truncating SCN2A variants have been reported in patients with EE that pose exceptions to this proposition (Kamiya et al. 2004, Carvill et al. 2013, Horvath et al. 2016, Moller et al. 2016, Wolff et al. 2017). These truncating variants, though functionally studied in only one case (Kamiya et al. 2004), are expected to result in a complete loss of function and would therefore well explain the developmental delay and mental impairment but not the development of seizures. A closer look at the respective reports revealed that a patient reported with moderate ID and seizures between the age of 4y 7m and 9y by Wolff et al. (2017) and carrying the variant W1716* is the same patient reported in this study, who was suspected but never proven to have seizures of absence type that were later interpreted as rather being mutistic episodes. The patient carrying the de novo variant R102* reported with intractable epilepsy, severe ID and ASD had a mother with recurrent febrile seizures (Kamiya et al. 2004) suggesting an inherited second hit contributing to the seizure phenotype, albeit not detected by our WES analysis. Accordingly, the same variant in an unrelated patient (Monies et al. 2017) with follow-up until age 6.5 years did not cause any seizures (personal communication Fowzan S. Alkuraya). The variant R1435* was reported twice as well, once in a patient with ASD, ID and seizures (Trump et al. 2016) and once in a patient with ID and ASD without seizures at the last follow-up at age 7y 8m (Wolff et al. 2017), also suggesting a possible second hit or other modifier in the first patient. The assumption of a modifying effect of the genetic background is supported by two studies where different strains of mice carrying the same Scn2a variant exhibited differences in seizure severity (Kearney et al. 2001, Thompson et al. 2017). In addition, acquired factors such as hypoxia may also impact Nav1.2 function (Plant et al. 2016, Winquist and Cohen 2018). It has recently been shown that voltage-gated sodium channels assemble and gate as dimers (Clatot et al. 2017) and that some pathogenic Nav1.5 variants exert a dominant-negative effect through impairing trafficking and gating of the wild-type channel (Clatot et al. 2012, Clatot et al. 2018). A possible dominant-negative effect was also discussed for pathogenic Nav1.2 variants since Kamiya et al. (2004) described a reduced whole-cell sodium current when co-expressing the truncating variant R102* together with wild-type. However, this effect disappeared when co-expressing β-subunits. Ben-Shalom et al. (2017) did not find a dominant-negative effect either when testing a non-conducting missense variant. Currently it can only be speculated if some of the variants might exert a dominant-negative effect and thereby could explain some outliers of the assumed genotype-phenotype correlation. Hence, this potential pathomechanism should be kept in mind and addressed in future studies using suitable models resembling the heterozygous constellation in the patient. Another point to consider regarding the pathomechanism of SCN2A variants is the isoform-dependent effect of Nav1.2 variants. Next to the ‘adult’ Nav1.2 isoform, which was used by all previous electrophysiological investigations utilizing overexpression of human SCN2A as well as in our study, a ‘neonatal’ isoform exists differing only in a single amino acid at position 209 of the protein (Kasai et al. 2001, Gazina et al. 2015). The ‘neonatal’ isoform is expressed at different levels at birth and then decreases until levelling at 10–20% of the ‘adult’ isoform at 20 weeks postnatally in mice (Gazina et al. 2010). Electrophysiological studies indicate that pathogenic variants can exert different effects in this ‘neonatal’ isoform compared to the predominantly studied ‘adult’ isoform (Xu et al. 2007, Liao, Deprez, et al. 2010b).

Conclusions

In conclusion, our work corroborates a strong genotype-phenotype correlation of deleterious SCN2A variants and demonstrates that structural modeling can be a useful tool to predict the severity of the variant impact, suggesting its potential as a useful and fast tool to support variant interpretation in diagnostics. We further illustrate the mechanism of how missense variants located in the pore-forming loop can lead to a loss of channel function and how C-terminally located missense variants can exert a severe disturbance on Nav1.2 gating properties. Supplementary Methods. Table S1. Activation and inactivation kinetics of Nav1.2 wild-type and mutants. Table S2. Use-dependent inactivation of Nav1.2 wild-type and mutants. Table S3. Previous electrophysiological studies of disease causing SCN2A variants. Table S4. Previous studies using in-silico modeling of neuronal excitability of disease causing SCN2A variants. (DOCX 46 kb)
  55 in total

1.  Dominant-negative effect of SCN5A N-terminal mutations through the interaction of Na(v)1.5 α-subunits.

Authors:  Jérôme Clatot; Azza Ziyadeh-Isleem; Svetlana Maugenre; Isabelle Denjoy; Haiyan Liu; Gilles Dilanian; Stéphane N Hatem; Isabelle Deschênes; Alain Coulombe; Pascale Guicheney; Nathalie Neyroud
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 10.787

2.  RASMOL: biomolecular graphics for all.

Authors:  R A Sayle; E J Milner-White
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 13.807

3.  Whole-exome sequencing improves the diagnosis yield in sporadic infantile spasm syndrome.

Authors:  S Dimassi; A Labalme; D Ville; A Calender; C Mignot; N Boutry-Kryza; J de Bellescize; C Rivier-Ringenbach; E Bourel-Ponchel; D Cheillan; T Simonet; K Maincent; M Rossi; M Till; S Mougou-Zerelli; P Edery; A Saad; D Heron; V des Portes; D Sanlaville; G Lesca
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 4.438

4.  Genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity suggest therapeutic implications in SCN2A-related disorders.

Authors:  Markus Wolff; Katrine M Johannesen; Ulrike B S Hedrich; Silvia Masnada; Guido Rubboli; Elena Gardella; Gaetan Lesca; Dorothée Ville; Mathieu Milh; Laurent Villard; Alexandra Afenjar; Sandra Chantot-Bastaraud; Cyril Mignot; Caroline Lardennois; Caroline Nava; Niklas Schwarz; Marion Gérard; Laurence Perrin; Diane Doummar; Stéphane Auvin; Maria J Miranda; Maja Hempel; Eva Brilstra; Nine Knoers; Nienke Verbeek; Marjan van Kempen; Kees P Braun; Grazia Mancini; Saskia Biskup; Konstanze Hörtnagel; Miriam Döcker; Thomas Bast; Tobias Loddenkemper; Lily Wong-Kisiel; Friedrich M Baumeister; Walid Fazeli; Pasquale Striano; Robertino Dilena; Elena Fontana; Federico Zara; Gerhard Kurlemann; Joerg Klepper; Jess G Thoene; Daniel H Arndt; Nicolas Deconinck; Thomas Schmitt-Mechelke; Oliver Maier; Hiltrud Muhle; Beverly Wical; Claudio Finetti; Reinhard Brückner; Joachim Pietz; Günther Golla; Dinesh Jillella; Karen M Linnet; Perrine Charles; Ute Moog; Eve Õiglane-Shlik; John F Mantovani; Kristen Park; Marie Deprez; Damien Lederer; Sandrine Mary; Emmanuel Scalais; Laila Selim; Rudy Van Coster; Lieven Lagae; Marina Nikanorova; Helle Hjalgrim; G Christoph Korenke; Marina Trivisano; Nicola Specchio; Berten Ceulemans; Thomas Dorn; Katherine L Helbig; Katia Hardies; Hannah Stamberger; Peter de Jonghe; Sarah Weckhuysen; Johannes R Lemke; Ingeborg Krägeloh-Mann; Ingo Helbig; Gerhard Kluger; Holger Lerche; Rikke S Møller
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  SCN2A mutation associated with neonatal epilepsy, late-onset episodic ataxia, myoclonus, and pain.

Authors:  Y Liao; A-K Anttonen; E Liukkonen; E Gaily; S Maljevic; S Schubert; A Bellan-Koch; S Petrou; V E Ahonen; H Lerche; A-E Lehesjoki
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Confirming an expanded spectrum of SCN2A mutations: a case series.

Authors:  Dena Matalon; Ethan Goldberg; Livija Medne; Eric D Marsh
Journal:  Epileptic Disord       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.819

7.  Voltage-gated sodium channels assemble and gate as dimers.

Authors:  Jérôme Clatot; Malcolm Hoshi; Xiaoping Wan; Haiyan Liu; Ankur Jain; Krekwit Shinlapawittayatorn; Céline Marionneau; Eckhard Ficker; Taekjip Ha; Isabelle Deschênes
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  The landscape of genetic diseases in Saudi Arabia based on the first 1000 diagnostic panels and exomes.

Authors:  Dorota Monies; Mohamed Abouelhoda; Moeenaldeen AlSayed; Zuhair Alhassnan; Maha Alotaibi; Husam Kayyali; Mohammed Al-Owain; Ayaz Shah; Zuhair Rahbeeni; Mohammad A Al-Muhaizea; Hamad I Alzaidan; Edward Cupler; Saeed Bohlega; Eissa Faqeih; Maha Faden; Banan Alyounes; Dyala Jaroudi; Ewa Goljan; Hadeel Elbardisy; Asma Akilan; Renad Albar; Hesham Aldhalaan; Shamshad Gulab; Aziza Chedrawi; Bandar K Al Saud; Wesam Kurdi; Nawal Makhseed; Tahani Alqasim; Heba Y El Khashab; Hamoud Al-Mousa; Amal Alhashem; Imaduddin Kanaan; Talal Algoufi; Khalid Alsaleem; Talal A Basha; Fathiya Al-Murshedi; Sameena Khan; Adila Al-Kindy; Maha Alnemer; Sami Al-Hajjar; Suad Alyamani; Hasan Aldhekri; Ali Al-Mehaidib; Rand Arnaout; Omar Dabbagh; Mohammad Shagrani; Dieter Broering; Maha Tulbah; Amal Alqassmi; Maisoon Almugbel; Mohammed AlQuaiz; Abdulaziz Alsaman; Khalid Al-Thihli; Raashda A Sulaiman; Wajeeh Al-Dekhail; Abeer Alsaegh; Fahad A Bashiri; Alya Qari; Suzan Alhomadi; Hisham Alkuraya; Mohammed Alsebayel; Muddathir H Hamad; Laszlo Szonyi; Faisal Abaalkhail; Sulaiman M Al-Mayouf; Hamad Almojalli; Khalid S Alqadi; Hussien Elsiesy; Taghreed M Shuaib; Mohammed Zain Seidahmed; Ibraheem Abosoudah; Hana Akleh; Abdulaziz AlGhonaium; Turki M Alkharfy; Fuad Al Mutairi; Wafa Eyaid; Abdullah Alshanbary; Farrukh R Sheikh; Fahad I Alsohaibani; Abdullah Alsonbul; Saeed Al Tala; Soher Balkhy; Randa Bassiouni; Ahmed S Alenizi; Maged H Hussein; Saeed Hassan; Mohamed Khalil; Brahim Tabarki; Saad Alshahwan; Amira Oshi; Yasser Sabr; Saad Alsaadoun; Mustafa A Salih; Sarar Mohamed; Habiba Sultana; Abdullah Tamim; Moayad El-Haj; Saif Alshahrani; Dalal K Bubshait; Majid Alfadhel; Tariq Faquih; Mohamed El-Kalioby; Shazia Subhani; Zeeshan Shah; Nabil Moghrabi; Brian F Meyer; Fowzan S Alkuraya
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  NeuroMatic: An Integrated Open-Source Software Toolkit for Acquisition, Analysis and Simulation of Electrophysiological Data.

Authors:  Jason S Rothman; R Angus Silver
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 4.081

10.  Nav1.2 haplodeficiency in excitatory neurons causes absence-like seizures in mice.

Authors:  Ikuo Ogiwara; Hiroyuki Miyamoto; Tetsuya Tatsukawa; Tetsushi Yamagata; Tojo Nakayama; Nafiseh Atapour; Eriko Miura; Emi Mazaki; Sara J Ernst; Dezhi Cao; Hideyuki Ohtani; Shigeyoshi Itohara; Yuchio Yanagawa; Mauricio Montal; Michisuke Yuzaki; Yushi Inoue; Takao K Hensch; Jeffrey L Noebels; Kazuhiro Yamakawa
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2018-07-19
View more
  13 in total

1.  The Autism-Associated Gene Scn2a Contributes to Dendritic Excitability and Synaptic Function in the Prefrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Perry W E Spratt; Roy Ben-Shalom; Caroline M Keeshen; Kenneth J Burke; Rebecca L Clarkson; Stephan J Sanders; Kevin J Bender
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  A Combined Proteomics and Metabolomics Profiling to Investigate the Genetic Heterogeneity of Autistic Children.

Authors:  Yuxi Zhao; Xueshan Cao; Liming Shen; Huajie Zhang; Jing Lin; Yan Gao; Margy Chen; Naseer Ullah Khan; Xiaoxiao Tang; Qi Hong; Chengyun Feng
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 5.590

3.  Hyperexcitability and Pharmacological Responsiveness of Cortical Neurons Derived from Human iPSCs Carrying Epilepsy-Associated Sodium Channel Nav1.2-L1342P Genetic Variant.

Authors:  Zhefu Que; Maria I Olivero-Acosta; Jingliang Zhang; Muriel Eaton; Anke M Tukker; Xiaoling Chen; Jiaxiang Wu; Junkai Xie; Tiange Xiao; Kyle Wettschurack; Layan Yunis; J Marshall Shafer; James A Schaber; Jean-Christophe Rochet; Aaron B Bowman; Chongli Yuan; Zhuo Huang; Chang-Deng Hu; Darci J Trader; William C Skarnes; Yang Yang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 6.709

4.  SCN2A-related epilepsy of infancy with migrating focal seizures: report of a variant with apparent gain- and loss-of-function effects.

Authors:  Xiao-Ru Yang; Vamsi Krishna Murthy Ginjupalli; Olivier Theriault; Hugo Poulin; Juan Pablo Appendino; Ping Yee Billie Au; Mohamed Chahine
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 2.974

Review 5.  Sodium channelopathies in neurodevelopmental disorders.

Authors:  Miriam H Meisler; Sophie F Hill; Wenxi Yu
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Homozygous SCN1B variants causing early infantile epileptic encephalopathy 52 affect voltage-gated sodium channel function.

Authors:  Marcello Scala; Stephanie Efthymiou; Tipu Sultan; Jolien De Waele; Marta Panciroli; Vincenzo Salpietro; Reza Maroofian; Pasquale Striano; Filip Van Petegem; Henry Houlden; Frank Bosmans
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 6.740

Review 7.  Sodium channelopathies of skeletal muscle and brain.

Authors:  Massimo Mantegazza; Sandrine Cestèle; William A Catterall
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 46.500

8.  A quadratic linear-parabolic model-based EEG classification to detect epileptic seizures.

Authors:  Antonio Quintero-Rincón; Carlos D'giano; Hadj Batatia
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2019-08-28

9.  Electrophysiological features: The next precise step for SCN2A developmental epileptic encephalopathy.

Authors:  Pu Miao; Siyang Tang; Jia Ye; Jianda Wang; Yuting Lou; Bijun Zhang; Xiaoxiao Xu; Xiaoquan Chen; Yuezhou Li; Jianhua Feng
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.183

10.  Differential Functional Changes of Nav1.2 Channel Causing SCN2A-Related Epilepsy and Status Epilepticus During Slow Sleep.

Authors:  Pu Miao; Siyang Tang; Jia Ye; Jihong Tang; Jianda Wang; Chaoguang Zheng; Yuezhou Li; Jianhua Feng
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.