Literature DB >> 30118143

Estimating lung, breast, and effective dose from low-dose lung cancer screening CT exams with tube current modulation across a range of patient sizes.

Anthony J Hardy1,2, Maryam Bostani1,2, Kyle McMillan3, Maria Zankl4, Cynthia McCollough5, Chris Cagnon1,2, Michael McNitt-Gray1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the radiation dose to the lung and breast as well as the effective dose from tube current modulated (TCM) lung cancer screening (LCS) scans across a range of patient sizes.
METHODS: Monte Carlo (MC) methods were used to calculate lung, breast, and effective doses from a low-dose LCS protocol for a 64-slice CT that used TCM. Scanning parameters were from the protocols published by AAPM's Alliance for Quality CT. To determine lung, breast, and effective doses from lung cancer screening, eight GSF/ICRP voxelized phantom models with all radiosensitive organs identified were used to estimate lung, breast, and effective doses. Additionally, to extend the limited size range provided by the GSF/ICRP phantom models, 30 voxelized patient models of thoracic anatomy were generated from LCS patient data. For these patient models, lung and breast were semi-automatically segmented. TCM schemes for each of the GSF/ICRP phantom models were generated using a validated method wherein tissue attenuation and scanner limitations were used to determine the TCM output as a function of table position and source angle. TCM schemes for voxelized patient models were extracted from the raw projection data. The water equivalent diameter, Dw, was used as the patient size descriptor. Dw was estimated for the GSF/ICRP models. For the thoracic patient models, Dw was extracted from the DICOM header of the CT localizer radiograph. MC simulations were performed using the TCM scheme for each model. Absolute organ doses were tallied and effective doses were calculated using ICRP 103 tissue weighting factors for the GSF/ICRP models. Metrics of scanner radiation output were determined based on each model's TCM scheme, including CTDIvol , dose length product (DLP), and CTDIvol, Low Att , a previously described regional metric of scanner output covering most of the lungs and breast. All lung and breast doses values were normalized by scan-specific CTDIvol and CTDIvol, Low Att . Effective doses were normalized by scan-specific CTDIvol and DLP. Absolute and normalized doses were reported as a function of Dw.
RESULTS: Lung doses normalized by CTDIvol, Low Att were modeled as an exponential relationship with respect to Dw with coefficients of determination (R2 ) of 0.80. Breast dose normalized by CTDIvol, Low Att was modeled with an exponential relationship to Dw with an R2 of 0.23. For all eight GSF/ICRP phantom models, the effective dose using TCM protocols was below 1.6 mSv. Effective doses showed some size dependence but when normalized by DLP demonstrated a constant behavior.
CONCLUSION: Lung, breast, and effective doses from LCS CT exams with TCM were estimated with respect to patient size. Normalized lung dose can be reasonably estimated with a measure of a patient size such as Dw and regional metric of CTDIvol covering the thorax such as CTDIvol, Low Att , while normalized breast dose can also be estimated with a regional metric of CTDIvol but with a larger degree of variability than observed for lung. Effective dose normalized by DLP can be estimated with a constant multiplier.
© 2018 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monte Carlo simulations; breast dose; computed tomography; effective dose; lung cancer screening; lung dose; tube current modulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30118143      PMCID: PMC6220713          DOI: 10.1002/mp.13131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  30 in total

1.  Estimated radiation dose associated with low-dose chest CT of average-size participants in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Frederick J Larke; Randell L Kruger; Christopher H Cagnon; Michael J Flynn; Michael M McNitt-Gray; Xizeng Wu; Phillip F Judy; Dianna D Cody
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  The feasibility of a scanner-independent technique to estimate organ dose from MDCT scans: using CTDIvol to account for differences between scanners.

Authors:  Adam C Turner; Maria Zankl; John J DeMarco; Chris H Cagnon; Di Zhang; Erin Angel; Dianna D Cody; Donna M Stevens; Cynthia H McCollough; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Dose conversion coefficients for CT examinations of adults with automatic tube current modulation.

Authors:  H Schlattl; M Zankl; J Becker; C Hoeschen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A method to generate equivalent energy spectra and filtration models based on measurement for multidetector CT Monte Carlo dosimetry simulations.

Authors:  Adam C Turner; Di Zhang; Hyun J Kim; John J DeMarco; Chris H Cagnon; Erin Angel; Dianna D Cody; Donna M Stevens; Andrew N Primak; Cynthia H McCollough; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Dianna D Cody; John M Boone; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements.

Authors:  W A Kalender; H Wolf; C Suess
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT.

Authors:  Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael M Maher; Thomas L Toth; Bernhard Schmidt; Bryan L Westerman; Hugh T Morgan; Sanjay Saini
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Dose to radiosensitive organs during routine chest CT: effects of tube current modulation.

Authors:  Erin Angel; Nazanin Yaghmai; Cecilia Matilda Jude; John J DeMarco; Christopher H Cagnon; Jonathan G Goldin; Cynthia H McCollough; Andrew N Primak; Dianna D Cody; Donna M Stevens; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Monte Carlo simulations to assess the effects of tube current modulation on breast dose for multidetector CT.

Authors:  Erin Angel; Nazanin Yaghmai; Cecilia Matilda Jude; John J Demarco; Christopher H Cagnon; Jonathan G Goldin; Andrew N Primak; Donna M Stevens; Dianna D Cody; Cynthia H McCollough; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  The feasibility of a regional CTDIvol to estimate organ dose from tube current modulated CT exams.

Authors:  Maryam Khatonabadi; Hyun J Kim; Peiyun Lu; Kyle L McMillan; Chris H Cagnon; John J DeMarco; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  2 in total

1.  Reference dataset for benchmarking fetal doses derived from Monte Carlo simulations of CT exams.

Authors:  Anthony J Hardy; Maryam Bostani; Erin Angel; Chris Cagnon; Ioannis Sechopoulos; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Image quality and clinical usefulness of automatic tube current modulation technology in female chest computed tomography screening.

Authors:  Cheng Li; Lin Qi; Yusheng Zhang; Feng Gao; Xiu Jin; Lukai Zhang; Huan Tang; Ming Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.