Tessie W October1,2, Zoelle B Dizon1, Melinda F Hamilton3, Vanessa N Madrigal1,2, Robert M Arnold4. 1. Division of Critical Care Medicine, Children's National Health Systems, Washington, District of Columbia, USA. 2. Department of Pediatrics, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA. 3. Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 4. Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inter-specialty clinicians often co-lead family conferences for hospitalised patients. Families frequently report receiving different messages from different clinicians. We developed a communication training workshop that crosses disciplines and co-trains clinicians in one setting to create a culture of delivering a unified message. METHODS: We developed a 2-day paediatric communication skills workshop to teach the skills necessary to conduct a family conference. The workshop was targeted at nurse-practitioners and faculty clinicians representing the different specialties that co-manage children in an intensive care unit. Our primary outcomes were learner self-assessment of skills attainment and workshop satisfaction. We also evaluated the feasibility of recruiting busy clinicians. RESULTS: Fifteen clinicians, including eight critical care faculty members (80% of eligible participants), three subspecialty faculty members (100% of eligible participants) and four nurse-practitioners (100% of eligible participants), participated. Learners' self-reported confidence improved in all communication metrics assessed. From pre- to post-workshop, confidence increased from 39% to 94% for 'giving bad news' (p < 0.05), from 50% to 83% for 'conducting a family conference' (p < 0.05), and from 39% to 100% for 'eliciting a family's values/preferences (p < 0.05). Every learner rated the workshop as important to their clinical practice and 100% would strongly recommend it to others. All reported the time commitment was not burdensome and 74% would choose this 2-day format over shorter formats. When clinicians learn together, they are more likely to speak the same language when communicating with each other, and ultimately to deliver the same message to families CONCLUSIONS: An inter-specialty communication training workshop for different types of clinician was well received. It is feasible to co-train different types of clinician in a joint session. When clinicians learn together, they are more likely to speak the same language when communicating with each other, and ultimately to deliver the same message to families.
BACKGROUND: Inter-specialty clinicians often co-lead family conferences for hospitalised patients. Families frequently report receiving different messages from different clinicians. We developed a communication training workshop that crosses disciplines and co-trains clinicians in one setting to create a culture of delivering a unified message. METHODS: We developed a 2-day paediatric communication skills workshop to teach the skills necessary to conduct a family conference. The workshop was targeted at nurse-practitioners and faculty clinicians representing the different specialties that co-manage children in an intensive care unit. Our primary outcomes were learner self-assessment of skills attainment and workshop satisfaction. We also evaluated the feasibility of recruiting busy clinicians. RESULTS: Fifteen clinicians, including eight critical care faculty members (80% of eligible participants), three subspecialty faculty members (100% of eligible participants) and four nurse-practitioners (100% of eligible participants), participated. Learners' self-reported confidence improved in all communication metrics assessed. From pre- to post-workshop, confidence increased from 39% to 94% for 'giving bad news' (p < 0.05), from 50% to 83% for 'conducting a family conference' (p < 0.05), and from 39% to 100% for 'eliciting a family's values/preferences (p < 0.05). Every learner rated the workshop as important to their clinical practice and 100% would strongly recommend it to others. All reported the time commitment was not burdensome and 74% would choose this 2-day format over shorter formats. When clinicians learn together, they are more likely to speak the same language when communicating with each other, and ultimately to deliver the same message to families CONCLUSIONS: An inter-specialty communication training workshop for different types of clinician was well received. It is feasible to co-train different types of clinician in a joint session. When clinicians learn together, they are more likely to speak the same language when communicating with each other, and ultimately to deliver the same message to families.
Authors: Robert M Arnold; Anthony L Back; Amber E Barnato; Thomas J Prendergast; Lillian L Emlet; Irina Karpov; Patrick H White; Judith E Nelson Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: E Azoulay; S Chevret; G Leleu; F Pochard; M Barboteu; C Adrie; P Canoui; J R Le Gall; B Schlemmer Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Erin M Johnson; Melinda F Hamilton; R Scott Watson; Rene Claxton; Michael Barnett; Ann E Thompson; Robert Arnold Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Cynthia Gordon; Ellen Barton; Kathleen L Meert; Susan Eggly; Murray Pollacks; Jerry Zimmerman; K J S Anand; Joseph Carcillo; Christopher J L Newth; J Michael Dean; Douglas F Willson; Carol Nicholson Journal: Commun Med Date: 2009
Authors: Wendy Tong; Komal P Murali; Laura D Fonseca; Craig D Blinderman; Rachel C Shelton; May Hua Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Wade Brown; Lekshmi Santhosh; Anna K Brady; Joshua L Denson; Abesh Niroula; Meredith E Pugh; Wesley H Self; Aaron M Joffe; P O'Neal Maynord; W Graham Carlos Journal: Crit Care Date: 2020-10-22 Impact factor: 9.097