Erin M Johnson1, Melinda F Hamilton, R Scott Watson, Rene Claxton, Michael Barnett, Ann E Thompson, Robert Arnold. 1. 1Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA. 2Peter M. Winter Institute for Simulation, Education, and Research (WISER), Pittsburgh, PA. 3Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA. 4Division of General Internal Medicine, The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA. 5University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Effective communication among providers, families, and patients is essential in critical care but is often inadequate in the PICU. To address the lack of communication education pediatric critical care medicine fellows receive, the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh PICU developed a simulation-based communication course, Pediatric Critical Care Communication course. Pediatric critical care medicine trainees have limited prior training in communication and will have increased confidence in their communication skills after participating in the Pediatric Critical Care Communication course. DESIGN: Pediatric Critical Care Communication is a 3-day course taken once during fellowship featuring simulation with actors portraying family members. SETTING: Off-site conference space as part of a pediatric critical care medicine educational curriculum. SUBJECTS: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Fellows. INTERVENTIONS: Didactic sessions and interactive simulation scenarios. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Prior to and after the course, fellows complete an anonymous survey asking about 1) prior instruction in communication, 2) preparedness for difficult conversations, 3) attitudes about end-of-life care, and 4) course satisfaction. We compared pre- and postcourse surveys using paired Student t test. Most of the 38 fellows who participated over 4 years had no prior communication training in conducting a care conference (70%), providing bad news (57%), or discussing end-of-life options (75%). Across all four iterations of the course, fellows after the course reported increased confidence across many topics of communication, including giving bad news, conducting a family conference, eliciting both a family's emotional reaction to their child's illness and their concerns at the end of a child's life, discussing a child's code status, and discussing religious issues. Specifically, fellows in 2014 reported significant increases in self-perceived preparedness to provide empathic communication to families regarding many aspects of discussing critical care, end-of-life care, and religious issues with patients' families (p < 0.05). The majority of fellows (90%) recommended that the course be required in pediatric critical care medicine fellowship. CONCLUSIONS: The Pediatric Critical Care Communication course increased fellow confidence in having difficult discussions common in the PICU. Fellows highly recommend it as part of PICU education. Further work should focus on the course's impact on family satisfaction with fellow communication.
OBJECTIVE: Effective communication among providers, families, and patients is essential in critical care but is often inadequate in the PICU. To address the lack of communication education pediatric critical care medicine fellows receive, the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh PICU developed a simulation-based communication course, Pediatric Critical Care Communication course. Pediatric critical care medicine trainees have limited prior training in communication and will have increased confidence in their communication skills after participating in the Pediatric Critical Care Communication course. DESIGN: Pediatric Critical Care Communication is a 3-day course taken once during fellowship featuring simulation with actors portraying family members. SETTING: Off-site conference space as part of a pediatric critical care medicine educational curriculum. SUBJECTS: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Fellows. INTERVENTIONS: Didactic sessions and interactive simulation scenarios. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Prior to and after the course, fellows complete an anonymous survey asking about 1) prior instruction in communication, 2) preparedness for difficult conversations, 3) attitudes about end-of-life care, and 4) course satisfaction. We compared pre- and postcourse surveys using paired Student t test. Most of the 38 fellows who participated over 4 years had no prior communication training in conducting a care conference (70%), providing bad news (57%), or discussing end-of-life options (75%). Across all four iterations of the course, fellows after the course reported increased confidence across many topics of communication, including giving bad news, conducting a family conference, eliciting both a family's emotional reaction to their child's illness and their concerns at the end of a child's life, discussing a child's code status, and discussing religious issues. Specifically, fellows in 2014 reported significant increases in self-perceived preparedness to provide empathic communication to families regarding many aspects of discussing critical care, end-of-life care, and religious issues with patients' families (p < 0.05). The majority of fellows (90%) recommended that the course be required in pediatric critical care medicine fellowship. CONCLUSIONS: The Pediatric Critical Care Communication course increased fellow confidence in having difficult discussions common in the PICU. Fellows highly recommend it as part of PICU education. Further work should focus on the course's impact on family satisfaction with fellow communication.
Authors: Judy E Davidson; Karen Powers; Kamyar M Hedayat; Mark Tieszen; Alexander A Kon; Eric Shepard; Vicki Spuhler; I David Todres; Mitchell Levy; Juliana Barr; Raj Ghandi; Gregory Hirsch; Deborah Armstrong Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Josephine M Clayton; Phyllis N Butow; Amy Waters; Rebekah C Laidsaar-Powell; Angela O'Brien; Frances Boyle; Anthony L Back; Robert M Arnold; James A Tulsky; Martin H N Tattersall Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2012-06-18 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: John J You; James Downar; Robert A Fowler; François Lamontagne; Irene W Y Ma; Dev Jayaraman; Jennifer Kryworuchko; Patricia H Strachan; Roy Ilan; Aman P Nijjar; John Neary; John Shik; Kevin Brazil; Amen Patel; Kim Wiebe; Martin Albert; Anita Palepu; Elysée Nouvet; Amanda Roze des Ordons; Nishan Sharma; Amane Abdul-Razzak; Xuran Jiang; Andrew Day; Daren K Heyland Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: B Taylor Thompson; Peter N Cox; Massimo Antonelli; Jean M Carlet; Joan Cassell; Nicholas S Hill; Charles J Hinds; Jorge M Pimentel; Konrad Reinhart; Lambertus G Thijs Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Kathleen L Meert; Susan Eggly; Murray Pollack; K J S Anand; Jerry Zimmerman; Joseph Carcillo; Christopher J L Newth; J Michael Dean; Douglas F Willson; Carol Nicholson Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Michael P Mendez; Harin Patel; Jordan Talan; Michelle Doering; Jared Chiarchiaro; Rebecca M Sternschein; Trevor C Steinbach; Jacqueline O'Toole; Abdulghani Sankari; Jennifer W McCallister; May M Lee; W Graham Carlos; Patrick G Lyons Journal: ATS Sch Date: 2020-07-14
Authors: Amy H J Wolfe; Pamela S Hinds; Adre J du Plessis; Heather Gordish-Dressman; Robert M Arnold; Lamia Soghier Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2022-06-30