Literature DB >> 30114766

Accurate effective atomic number determination with polychromatic grating-based phase-contrast computed tomography.

Lorenz Birnbacher, Marian Willner, Mathias Marschner, Daniela Pfeiffer, Franz Pfeiffer, Julia Herzen.   

Abstract

The demand for quantitative medical imaging is increasing in the ongoing digitalization. Conventional computed tomography (CT) is energy-dependent and therefore of limited comparability. In contrast, dual-energy CT (DECT) allows for the determination of absolute image contrast quantities, namely the electron density and the effective atomic number, and is already established in clinical radiology and radiation therapy. Grating-based phase-contrast computed tomography (GBPC-CT) is an experimental X-ray technique that also allows for the measurement of the electron density and the effective atomic number. However, the determination of both quantities is challenging when dealing with polychromatic GBPC-CT setups. In this paper, we present how to calculate the effective atomic numbers with a polychromatic, laboratory GBPC-CT setup operating between 35 and 50\,kVp. First, we investigated the accuracy of the measurement of the attenuation coefficients and electron densities. For this, we performed a calibration using the concept of effective energy. With the reliable experimental quantitative values, we were able to evaluate the effective atomic numbers of the investigated materials using a method previously shown with monochromatic X-ray radiation. In detail, we first calculated the ratio of the electron density and attenuation coefficient, which were experimentally determined with our polychromatic GBPC-CT setup. Second, we compared this ratio with tabulated total attenuation cross sections from literature values to determine the effective atomic numbers. Thus, we were able to calculate two physical absolute quantities -- the electron density and effective atomic number -- that are in general independent of the specific experimental conditions like the X-ray beam spectrum or the setup design.

Year:  2018        PMID: 30114766     DOI: 10.1364/OE.26.015153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Opt Express        ISSN: 1094-4087            Impact factor:   3.894


  4 in total

1.  Phy-X/ZeXTRa: a software for robust calculation of effective atomic numbers for photon, electron, proton, alpha particle, and carbon ion interactions.

Authors:  Ö F Özpolat; B Alım; E Şakar; M Büyükyıldız; M Kurudirek
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Direct quantitative material decomposition employing grating-based X-ray phase-contrast CT.

Authors:  Eva Braig; Jessica Böhm; Martin Dierolf; Christoph Jud; Benedikt Günther; Korbinian Mechlem; Sebastian Allner; Thorsten Sellerer; Klaus Achterhold; Bernhard Gleich; Peter Noël; Daniela Pfeiffer; Ernst Rummeny; Julia Herzen; Franz Pfeiffer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Scattering of therapeutic radiation in the presence of craniofacial bone reconstruction materials.

Authors:  Joonas Toivonen; Mikko Björkqvist; Heikki Minn; Pekka K Vallittu; Jami Rekola
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 4.  Quantitative X-ray phase contrast computed tomography with grating interferometry : Biomedical applications of quantitative X-ray grating-based phase contrast computed tomography.

Authors:  Lorenz Birnbacher; Eva-Maria Braig; Daniela Pfeiffer; Franz Pfeiffer; Julia Herzen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 9.236

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.