Literature DB >> 30113665

Predicting Inpatient Length of Stay After Brain Tumor Surgery: Developing Machine Learning Ensembles to Improve Predictive Performance.

Whitney E Muhlestein1, Dallin S Akagi2, Jason M Davies3,4, Lola B Chambless1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current outcomes prediction tools are largely based on and limited by regression methods. Utilization of machine learning (ML) methods that can handle multiple diverse inputs could strengthen predictive abilities and improve patient outcomes. Inpatient length of stay (LOS) is one such outcome that serves as a surrogate for patient disease severity and resource utilization.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a novel method to systematically rank, select, and combine ML algorithms to build a model that predicts LOS following craniotomy for brain tumor.
METHODS: A training dataset of 41 222 patients who underwent craniotomy for brain tumor was created from the National Inpatient Sample. Twenty-nine ML algorithms were trained on 26 preoperative variables to predict LOS. Trained algorithms were ranked by calculating the root mean square logarithmic error (RMSLE) and top performing algorithms combined to form an ensemble. The ensemble was externally validated using a dataset of 4592 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Additional analyses identified variables that most strongly influence the ensemble model predictions.
RESULTS: The ensemble model predicted LOS with RMSLE of .555 (95% confidence interval, .553-.557) on internal validation and .631 on external validation. Nonelective surgery, preoperative pneumonia, sodium abnormality, or weight loss, and non-White race were the strongest predictors of increased LOS.
CONCLUSION: An ML ensemble model predicts LOS with good performance on internal and external validation, and yields clinical insights that may potentially improve patient outcomes. This systematic ML method can be applied to a broad range of clinical problems to improve patient care.
Copyright © 2018 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Length of stay; Machine learning; Outcomes; Predictive modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30113665      PMCID: PMC7137462          DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  20 in total

1.  Detection of single and clustered microcalcifications in mammograms using fractals models and neural networks.

Authors:  L Bocchi; G Coppini; J Nori; G Valli
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 2.  Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Radiation Therapy Outcomes: A Clinician's Perspective.

Authors:  John Kang; Russell Schwartz; John Flickinger; Sushil Beriwal
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman; Yvonne Vergouwe; Patrick Royston; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-05-28

Review 4.  Validation, updating and impact of clinical prediction rules: a review.

Authors:  D B Toll; K J M Janssen; Y Vergouwe; K G M Moons
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5.  Machine learning applications in genetics and genomics.

Authors:  Maxwell W Libbrecht; William Stafford Noble
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  The Impact of Race on Discharge Disposition and Length of Hospitalization After Craniotomy for Brain Tumor.

Authors:  Whitney E Muhlestein; Dallin S Akagi; Silky Chotai; Lola B Chambless
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.104

7.  Algorithms outperform metabolite tests in predicting response of patients with inflammatory bowel disease to thiopurines.

Authors:  Akbar K Waljee; Joel C Joyce; Sijian Wang; Aditi Saxena; Margaret Hart; Ji Zhu; Peter D R Higgins
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 8.  Machine Learning in Medicine.

Authors:  Rahul C Deo
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Machine learning algorithms outperform conventional regression models in predicting development of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Amit G Singal; Ashin Mukherjee; B Joseph Elmunzer; Peter D R Higgins; Anna S Lok; Ji Zhu; Jorge A Marrero; Akbar K Waljee
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  A primer on predictive models.

Authors:  Akbar K Waljee; Peter D R Higgins; Amit G Singal
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 4.488

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Machine Learning in Neuro-Oncology, Epilepsy, Alzheimer's Disease, and Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Mason English; Chitra Kumar; Bonnie Legg Ditterline; Doniel Drazin; Nicholas Dietz
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2022

2.  Novel QSAR Approach for a Regression Model of Clearance That Combines DeepSnap-Deep Learning and Conventional Machine Learning.

Authors:  Hideaki Mamada; Yukihiro Nomura; Yoshihiro Uesawa
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-05-11

3.  Machine Learning Classification of Cerebral Aneurysm Rupture Status with Morphologic Variables and Hemodynamic Parameters.

Authors:  Satoru Tanioka; Fujimaro Ishida; Atsushi Yamamoto; Shigetoshi Shimizu; Hiroshi Sakaida; Mitsuru Toyoda; Nobuhisa Kashiwagi; Hidenori Suzuki
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-01-15

4.  An explainable machine learning framework for lung cancer hospital length of stay prediction.

Authors:  Belal Alsinglawi; Osama Alshari; Mohammed Alorjani; Omar Mubin; Fady Alnajjar; Mauricio Novoa; Omar Darwish
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Machine learning in patient flow: a review.

Authors:  Rasheed El-Bouri; Thomas Taylor; Alexey Youssef; Tingting Zhu; David A Clifton
Journal:  Prog Biomed Eng (Bristol)       Date:  2021-02-22

6.  Improving patient flow during infectious disease outbreaks using machine learning for real-time prediction of patient readiness for discharge.

Authors:  Jennifer A Bishop; Hamza A Javed; Rasheed El-Bouri; Tingting Zhu; Thomas Taylor; Tim Peto; Peter Watkinson; David W Eyre; David A Clifton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paula Dhiman; Jie Ma; Constanza L Andaur Navarro; Benjamin Speich; Garrett Bullock; Johanna A A Damen; Lotty Hooft; Shona Kirtley; Richard D Riley; Ben Van Calster; Karel G M Moons; Gary S Collins
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Could Machine Learning Better Predict Postoperative C5 Palsy of Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament?

Authors:  Soo Heon Kim; Sun Ho Lee; Dong Ah Shin
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 1.723

9.  Machine learning models to predict length of stay and discharge destination in complex head and neck surgery.

Authors:  Khodayar Goshtasbi; Tyler M Yasaka; Mehdi Zandi-Toghani; Hamid R Djalilian; William B Armstrong; Tjoson Tjoa; Yarah M Haidar; Mehdi Abouzari
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 10.  Prediction of intensive care units length of stay: a concise review.

Authors:  Igor Tona Peres; Silvio Hamacher; Fernando Luiz Cyrino Oliveira; Fernando Augusto Bozza; Jorge Ibrain Figueira Salluh
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.