Literature DB >> 26581149

Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Radiation Therapy Outcomes: A Clinician's Perspective.

John Kang1, Russell Schwartz2, John Flickinger3, Sushil Beriwal4.   

Abstract

Radiation oncology has always been deeply rooted in modeling, from the early days of isoeffect curves to the contemporary Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) initiative. In recent years, medical modeling for both prognostic and therapeutic purposes has exploded thanks to increasing availability of electronic data and genomics. One promising direction that medical modeling is moving toward is adopting the same machine learning methods used by companies such as Google and Facebook to combat disease. Broadly defined, machine learning is a branch of computer science that deals with making predictions from complex data through statistical models. These methods serve to uncover patterns in data and are actively used in areas such as speech recognition, handwriting recognition, face recognition, "spam" filtering (junk email), and targeted advertising. Although multiple radiation oncology research groups have shown the value of applied machine learning (ML), clinical adoption has been slow due to the high barrier to understanding these complex models by clinicians. Here, we present a review of the use of ML to predict radiation therapy outcomes from the clinician's point of view with the hope that it lowers the "barrier to entry" for those without formal training in ML. We begin by describing 7 principles that one should consider when evaluating (or creating) an ML model in radiation oncology. We next introduce 3 popular ML methods--logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), and artificial neural network (ANN)--and critique 3 seminal papers in the context of these principles. Although current studies are in exploratory stages, the overall methodology has progressively matured, and the field is ready for larger-scale further investigation.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26581149     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.2286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  53 in total

1.  Predicting Inpatient Length of Stay After Brain Tumor Surgery: Developing Machine Learning Ensembles to Improve Predictive Performance.

Authors:  Whitney E Muhlestein; Dallin S Akagi; Jason M Davies; Lola B Chambless
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 2.  Internet-based computer technology on radiotherapy.

Authors:  James C L Chow
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-09-08

3.  Long-term CT surveillance after primary lung cancer treatment captures events in all risk groups.

Authors:  John Kang; Amit K Chowdhry; Michael T Milano
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-02

4.  The effect of imputing missing clinical attribute values on training lung cancer survival prediction model performance.

Authors:  Mohamed S Barakat; Matthew Field; Aditya Ghose; David Stirling; Lois Holloway; Shalini Vinod; Andre Dekker; David Thwaites
Journal:  Health Inf Sci Syst       Date:  2017-12-06

5.  The Impact of Race on Discharge Disposition and Length of Hospitalization After Craniotomy for Brain Tumor.

Authors:  Whitney E Muhlestein; Dallin S Akagi; Silky Chotai; Lola B Chambless
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  Toward a model-based patient selection strategy for proton therapy: External validation of photon-derived normal tissue complication probability models in a head and neck proton therapy cohort.

Authors:  Pierre Blanchard; Andrew J Wong; G Brandon Gunn; Adam S Garden; Abdallah S R Mohamed; David I Rosenthal; Joseph Crutison; Richard Wu; Xiaodong Zhang; X Ronald Zhu; Radhe Mohan; Mayankkumar V Amin; C David Fuller; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 7.  Clinical applications of textural analysis in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Iain Phillips; Mazhar Ajaz; Veni Ezhil; Vineet Prakash; Sheaka Alobaidli; Sarah J McQuaid; Christopher South; James Scuffham; Andrew Nisbet; Philip Evans
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Risk prediction for delayed clearance of high-dose methotrexate in pediatric hematological malignancies by machine learning.

Authors:  Min Zhan; Zebin Chen; Changcai Ding; Qiang Qu; Guoqiang Wang; Sixi Liu; Feiqiu Wen
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 2.490

9.  Machine learning and modeling: Data, validation, communication challenges.

Authors:  Issam El Naqa; Dan Ruan; Gilmer Valdes; Andre Dekker; Todd McNutt; Yaorong Ge; Q Jackie Wu; Jung Hun Oh; Maria Thor; Wade Smith; Arvind Rao; Clifton Fuller; Ying Xiao; Frank Manion; Matthew Schipper; Charles Mayo; Jean M Moran; Randall Ten Haken
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Using machine learning to predict radiation pneumonitis in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Authors:  Gilmer Valdes; Timothy D Solberg; Marina Heskel; Lyle Ungar; Charles B Simone
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.