| Literature DB >> 30112375 |
Hai-Bin Liu1,2, Wen-Xue Yuan1, Qing-Yong Wang1, Yan-Xia Wang3, Hou-Wen Cao1, Jian Xu1, Kai-Rong Qin4.
Abstract
This paper studied the alterations in arterial stiffness and hemodynamic responses during resting state and immediately following acute cycling intervention at different times across 12-week supervised exercise training. Twenty-six sedentary young males participated in the exercise training program at moderate intensity. Arterial stiffness and hemodynamic variables of the right common carotid artery were measured and computed during resting state and immediately following acute cycling intervention at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12. Across the 12-week exercise training, carotid arterial stiffness was decreased at weeks 8 and 12 and hemodynamic variables were improved at week 12 during resting state. In response to acute cycling intervention, carotid arterial stiffness exhibited an acute increase foremost at 8 weeks, and arterial maximal and mean diameters showed acute decreases at weeks 0 and 4. Despite significant differences in arterial stiffness and hemodynamic variables between resting state and immediately after acute intervention for each time period, these differences presented a progressive decrease across the 12-week exercise training. In conclusion, long-term exercise training not only improved carotid arterial stiffness and hemodynamic alterations when at rest but also negated the acute responses of carotid arterial stiffness and hemodynamic variables to acute cycling intervention.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30112375 PMCID: PMC6077594 DOI: 10.1155/2018/2907548
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Schematic presentation of acute cycling intervention and exercise training.
Figure 2Images and extractions of arterial diameter and center-line velocity waveforms.
Figure 3Arterial diameter and carotid blood pressure waveforms.
Figure 4Pressure-strain elastic modulus ( E p ) and arterial stiffness index ( β ). Data are presented for at rest (●) as well as after cycling (□). + Significant difference between at rest and after cycling: P < 0.05. ∗ Significant difference from baseline within group: P < 0.05.
Figure 5Arterial diameters (D). Data are presented for at rest (●) as well as after cycling (□). + Significant difference between at rest and after cycling: P < 0.05. ∗ Significant difference from baseline within group: P < 0.05.
The changes in carotid blood flow at rest and after acute cycling across 12-week training.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| At rest | 72±7 | 71±7 | 69±6 | 67±6 | ||||
| Acute cycling | 97±10 | + | 96±9 | + | 91±11 | + | 89±10 | + | |
|
| At rest | 68±11 | 71±12 | 72±11 | 73±10 | ||||
| Acute cycling | 92±22 | + | 94±18 | + | 94±17 | + | 95±13 | + | |
|
| At rest | 23±5 | 24±5 | 25±6 | 26±4 | ||||
| Acute cycling | 29±7 | + | 30±7 | + | 31±5 | + | 33±5 | + | |
|
| At rest | 11±4 | 13±5 | 14±5 | 14±3 | ||||
| Acute cycling | 15±6 | + | 16±7 | + | 17±6 | + | 18±8 | + | |
|
| At rest | 11.64±1.78 | 12.02±2.17 | 13.76±2.29 | 14.49±2.41 | ||||
| Acute cycling | 16.82±4.17 | + | 16.97±4.57 | + | 17.09±6.28 | + | 17.32±4.84 | + | |
|
| At rest | 3.22±0.53 | 3.36±0.67 | 3.51±0.69 | 4.08±0.78 | ||||
| Acute cycling | 4.40±0.89 | + | 4.44±1.43 | + | 4.34±1.35 | + | 4.38±1.16 | ||
|
| At rest | 0.56±1.64 | 0.62±2.05 | 0.63±1.38 | 0.75±1.49 | ||||
| Acute cycling | -1.65±1.03 | + | -0.94±1.55 | + | -1.01±1.58 | + | -1.07±2.25 | + |
∗: significant difference from baseline at P<0.05; +: significance between at rest and after acute cycling at P<0.05; HR, heart rate (beats/min); , , and min, maximal, mean, and minimal center-line velocity (CV, cm/s); , , and , maximal, mean, and minimal flow rate (FR, ml/s).
Figure 6Blood pressure (P) and circumferential strains (CS). Data are presented for at rest (●) as well as after cycling (□). + Significant difference between at rest and after cycling: P < 0.05. ∗ Significant difference from baseline within group: P < 0.05.
Figure 7Wall shear stress (WSS) and oscillatory shear indexes (OSI). Data are presented for at rest (●) as well as after cycling (□). + Significant difference between at rest and after cycling: P < 0.05. ∗ Significant difference from baseline within group: P < 0.05.
Figure 8Dynamic resistance (DR) and peripheral resistance (PR). Data are presented for at rest (●) as well as after cycling (□). + Significant difference between at rest and after cycling: P < 0.05. ∗ Significant difference from baseline within group: P < 0.05.