Literature DB >> 30111977

Adherence to guidelines in requesting Oncotype DX in a publicly funded health care system.

S Martel1, M Lambertini2,3, R Simon4, C Matte5, C Prady1.   

Abstract

Background: Oncotype dx [odx (Genomic Health, Redwood City, CA, U.S.A.)] is an approved prognostic tool for women with node-negative, hormone receptor-positive, her2-negative breast cancer. Because of cost, optimal use of this test is crucial, especially in a publicly funded health care system. We evaluated adherence with our provincial guidelines for odx requests, the management of patients with an intermediate recurrence score (rs), and the cost impact of odx.
Methods: This retrospective study included 201 consecutive patients with an odx request from two university institutions in Quebec between May 2012 and December 2014. Concordance with provincial guidelines was estimated, with its 95% confidence interval (ci). For patients with an intermediate rs, factors influencing the final treatment decision were assessed. The cost impact of odx was derived from the proportion of patients for whom chemotherapy was not recommended.
Results: In 93.0% of patients (95% ci: 89.5% to 96.6%), odx was ordered according to guidelines. The concordance was similar in both institutions (92.7%; 95% ci: 88.1% to 97.3%; and 93.6%; 95% ci: 88.2% to 99.0%). In 112 (55.7%), 78 (38.8%), and 9 (4.5%) patients, the rs suggested low, intermediate, and high risk respectively. In the intermediate-risk group, most patients (n = 58, 74.4%) did not receive chemotherapy, mainly because of patient preference and the absence of a clear proven benefit. Savings of CA$100,000 for the study period (2.5 years) were estimated to be associated with odx use. Conclusions: In our experience, the use of odx was concordant with published recommendations and had a positive cost impact.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early breast cancer; Oncotype dx; her2-negative disease; hormone receptor–positive disease; multigene assays; node-negative disease

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30111977      PMCID: PMC6092063          DOI: 10.3747/co.25.3965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  14 in total

1.  Quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and the Oncotype DX test for assessment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status: time to reflect again?

Authors:  John M S Bartlett; Jane Starczynski
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Soonmyung Paik; Steven Shak; Gong Tang; Chungyeul Kim; Joffre Baker; Maureen Cronin; Frederick L Baehner; Michael G Walker; Drew Watson; Taesung Park; William Hiller; Edwin R Fisher; D Lawrence Wickerham; John Bryant; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Breast cancer statistics, 2015: Convergence of incidence rates between black and white women.

Authors:  Carol E DeSantis; Stacey A Fedewa; Ann Goding Sauer; Joan L Kramer; Robert A Smith; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of recurrence score-guided treatment using a 21-gene assay in early breast cancer.

Authors:  Daphne T Tsoi; Miho Inoue; Catherine M Kelly; Sunil Verma; Kathleen I Pritchard
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-04-26

Review 5.  Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Lyndsay N Harris; Nofisat Ismaila; Lisa M McShane; Fabrice Andre; Deborah E Collyar; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Elizabeth H Hammond; Nicole M Kuderer; Minetta C Liu; Robert G Mennel; Catherine Van Poznak; Robert C Bast; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Prospective Clinical Utility Study of the Use of the 21-Gene Assay in Adjuvant Clinical Decision Making in Women With Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early Invasive Breast Cancer: Results From the SWITCH Study.

Authors:  Joseph Gligorov; Xavier B Pivot; William Jacot; Hervé L Naman; Dominique Spaeth; Jean-Louis Misset; Rémy Largillier; Jean-Loup Sautiere; Anne de Roquancourt; Christophe Pomel; Philippe Rouanet; Roman Rouzier; Frederique M Penault-Llorca
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-06-25

7.  Using proliferative markers and Oncotype DX in therapeutic decision-making for breast cancer: the B.C. experience.

Authors:  E Baxter; L Gondara; C Lohrisch; S Chia; K Gelmon; M Hayes; A Davidson; S Tyldesley
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 8.  Gene expression profiling and expanded immunohistochemistry tests to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer management: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  S Ward; A Scope; R Rafia; A Pandor; S Harnan; P Evans; L Wyld
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.014

9.  The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) Initiative: methods of the EGAPP Working Group.

Authors:  Steven M Teutsch; Linda A Bradley; Glenn E Palomaki; James E Haddow; Margaret Piper; Ned Calonge; W David Dotson; Michael P Douglas; Alfred O Berg
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Breast-cancer-specific mortality in patients treated based on the 21-gene assay: a SEER population-based study.

Authors:  Valentina I Petkov; Dave P Miller; Nadia Howlader; Nathan Gliner; Will Howe; Nicola Schussler; Kathleen Cronin; Frederick L Baehner; Rosemary Cress; Dennis Deapen; Sally L Glaser; Brenda Y Hernandez; Charles F Lynch; Lloyd Mueller; Ann G Schwartz; Stephen M Schwartz; Antoinette Stroup; Carol Sweeney; Thomas C Tucker; Kevin C Ward; Charles Wiggins; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Lynne Penberthy; Steven Shak
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-06-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  Inappropriate use of clinical practices in Canada: a systematic review.

Authors:  Janet E Squires; Danielle Cho-Young; Laura D Aloisio; Robert Bell; Stephen Bornstein; Susan E Brien; Simon Decary; Melissa Demery Varin; Mark Dobrow; Carole A Estabrooks; Ian D Graham; Megan Greenough; Doris Grinspun; Michael Hillmer; Tanya Horsley; Jiale Hu; Alan Katz; Christina Krause; John Lavis; Wendy Levinson; Adrian Levy; Michelina Mancuso; Steve Morgan; Letitia Nadalin-Penno; Andrew Neuner; Tamara Rader; Wilmer J Santos; Gary Teare; Joshua Tepper; Amanda Vandyk; Michael Wilson; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 16.859

2.  Gene Expression Profiling Tests for Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2020-03-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.