Stefanie Stallard1, Masha G Savelieff2, Kyle Wierzbicki1, Brendan Mullan1, Zachary Miklja1, Amy Bruzek3, Taylor Garcia1, Ruby Siada1, Bailey Anderson1, Benjamin H Singer4, Rintaro Hashizume5,6, Angel M Carcaboso7, Kaitlin Q McMurray3, Jason Heth3, Karin Muraszko3, Patricia L Robertson1, Rajen Mody1, Sriram Venneti8, Hugh Garton3, Carl Koschmann9. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, 3520D MSRB I, 1150 W Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. 2. SciGency Science Communications, Ann Arbor, MI, 48104, USA. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. 5. Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. 6. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. 7. Department of Oncology, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, 08950, Barcelona, Spain. 8. Department of Pathology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. 9. Department of Pediatrics, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, 3520D MSRB I, 1150 W Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. ckoschma@med.umich.edu.
Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is a lethal childhood brain cancer and patients face a grim prognosis with few treatment options [7]. Targeted therapies based on actionable genetic mutations may offer DIPGpatients novel treatment regimens [9, 10]. Although whole exome sequencing (WES) of tumor tissue can fully characterize the somatic mutational profile, it requires a surgical procedure and is relatively costly and time consuming. Consequently, less invasive and more rapid diagnostic tests are needed to detect actionable brain cancer mutations.Brain tumors and metastases to the brain shed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), which can be leveraged for the detection of tumor-associated genetic mutations from minimally invasive lumbar punctures [16]. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is an ultrasensitive PCR method that can detect low copy numbers of DNA, including ctDNA, in CSF [13]. It has proven adept for the detection of ctDNA mutations in CSF from patients with primary brain tumors [3, 5, 14] and central nervous system (CNS) metastases from other cancers [3, 8, 12, 14, 15, 17].The majority of DIPGs possess a recurrent, potentially actionable mutation to histone 3 (either H3F3A or HIST1H3B) at lysine position 27 (K27M). H3K27M detection in CSF by a combination of nested PCR and Sanger sequencing in DIPGpatients [6] as well as by ddPCR in older diffuse midline gliomapatients has been reported [11]. Thus far, there have been no extensive studies using ddPCR to quantify ctDNA in the CSF of younger pediatric DIPGpatients. Additionally, there are significant gaps in our knowledge, including whether ctDNA abundance depends on location of sample collection and whether ctDNA can quantify tumor growth and treatment response. To help answer these questions, we developed a novel ddPCR assay for the H3F3AK27M mutation and applied it to four pediatric patients with H3F3AK27M-mutant DIPG and non-brainstem GBM, including multi-focal sampling of one patient. Additionally, we generated an in vitro co-culture model of DIPG cells and astrocytes (NHA), evaluating their release of DNA into cell culture media as a means to simulate ctDNA release into the CSF.We employed ddPCR because it is a rapid, simple, and ultra-sensitive method of DNA detection capable of accurate quantification down to very low copy number [13]. We designed PCR probes specific to wild-type (WT) H3F3A and mutant K27M sequences (Additional file 1: supporting information, SI), which were validated for low copy detection and linearity by serial dilution of synthetic K27M mutant sequence oligonucleotide (Additional file 2: Figure S1), as well as in control CSF (no CNS tumor) with and without synthetic K27Moligonucleotide (Additional file 2: Figure S2). This fully validated ddPCR method was then used on experimental samples (Fig. 1a). In a prospective cohort of patients who were enrolled in the IRB-approved University of Michigan Brain Tumor CSF Registry, CSF ddPCR results were compared to contrast-enhancing and total tumor cross-sectional area on MRI.
Fig. 1
a CSF ddPCR results from experimental samples correlated with contrast-enhancing and total tumor cross-sectional area on MRI. b ddPCR of multi-focal sampling shows K27M copy number varies between tumor (purple) and CSF (orange) regions c Co-culture scheme of bioluminescent human DIPG007 cells with NHAs. d DIPG007 cells release ctDNA in proportion to their proliferation. e 8 Gy radiation results in an increase in mutant ctDNA from DIPG007 cells
a CSF ddPCR results from experimental samples correlated with contrast-enhancing and total tumor cross-sectional area on MRI. b ddPCR of multi-focal sampling shows K27M copy number varies between tumor (purple) and CSF (orange) regions c Co-culture scheme of bioluminescent human DIPG007 cells with NHAs. d DIPG007 cells release ctDNA in proportion to their proliferation. e 8 Gy radiation results in an increase in mutant ctDNA from DIPG007 cellsWe found that ddPCR was able to detect the K27M mutation in patient CSF and that the closest relationship emerged between mutant K27M copies per ng of total DNA (hereafter K27M copies) and contrast-enhancing cross-sectional tumor area on MRI (Fig. 1a). We then used ddPCR for multi-focal sampling of an eight-year-old patient with DIPG at autopsy (UMPED18) and observed that K27M copies varied throughout the tumor (Fig. 1b). The number of K27M copies was two-fold higher in CSF from the lateral ventricle as compared to CSF from a lumbar puncture, in accordance with prior studies that have suggested that ctDNA release into the CSF may be reliant upon the location of the tumor adjacent to a CSF reservoir [16]. If this finding is confirmed in future cases with multi-focal sampling, lumbar samples may have reduced sensitivity for CSF ctDNA compared to ventricular samples.To better understand changes in K27M copy number in response to both growth and treatment of DIPG cells, we created an experimental in vitro model of bioluminescent human DIPG007 cells co-cultured with NHAs (Fig. 1c). We found that DIPG007 cells released more ctDNA into culture media in proportion to their proliferation (Fig. 1d), even when the media was changed frequently to approximate the constant production and resorption of CSF. This suggests that, at least in part, ctDNA correlates with tumor cell proliferation. However, irradiation with 8 Gy resulted in a dramatic increase in mutant ctDNA approximately 72–120 h post radiotherapy (Fig. 1e) before tapering off. The results suggest ddPCR may be a viable method for monitoring response to therapy with an early release of ctDNA indicative of an effective treatment.The dawn of precision medicine, and its potential benefit to patients, has spurred research into faster, simpler, and less invasive methods of detection of actionable tumor-associated mutations. Due to its great sensitivity and low limit of detection, ddPCR has been used to detect tumor mutations in CSF from a range of cancerpatients [1–5, 8, 12, 14, 15, 17]. However, there has been little elaboration within the literature on whether tumor size may be related to the amount of ctDNA detected by ddPCR or its suitability to track response to treatment.Our pilot study suggests that H3F3AK27M copies in the CSF of children with DIPG and high-grade glioma have a linear relationship with contrast-enhancing cross-sectional tumor area and confirms the importance of proximity of a sample to the tumor. The former observation was further supported by in vitro experiments showing that tumor cell proliferation results in increased ctDNA and that H3F3AK27M copies can be used to follow treatment response due to temporarily enhanced ctDNA release shortly after effective therapies. Our study lays the ground work for the inclusion of CSF analysis with surveillance MRIs in the treatment of this patient population.Supplemental Information. Detailed methods and H3F3AK27M assay design. (DOCX 28 kb)Figure S1. Serial dilution of K27M mutant oligonucleotide in constant background of wild-type DNA demonstrates consistent detection down to at least 2% VAF under typical experimental conditions, with the possibility of detection at even lower VAF under ideal conditions. One such dilution series is shown above, with (a) showing number of droplets positive for mutant or wild-type H3F3A sequence and (b) showing the corresponding VAF values. Figure S2. Plot of droplets (blue – positive mutant H3F3AK27M, green – positive wildtype H3F3A, grey – negative droplets) from ddPCR performed on (a) non-tumorhuman CSF spiked with synthetic K27M mutant sequence oligonucleotide and (b) non-tumorhuman CSF alone. (DOCX 268 kb)
Authors: Yuxuan Wang; Simeon Springer; Ming Zhang; K Wyatt McMahon; Isaac Kinde; Lisa Dobbyn; Janine Ptak; Henry Brem; Kaisorn Chaichana; Gary L Gallia; Ziya L Gokaslan; Mari L Groves; George I Jallo; Michael Lim; Alessandro Olivi; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; Daniele Rigamonti; Greg J Riggins; Daniel M Sciubba; Jon D Weingart; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Xiaobu Ye; Sueli Mieko Oba-Shinjo; Suely K N Marie; Matthias Holdhoff; Nishant Agrawal; Luis A Diaz; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Chetan Bettegowda Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-07-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Laura S Hiemcke-Jiwa; Monique C Minnema; Joyce H Radersma-van Loon; N Mehdi Jiwa; Mirthe de Boer; Roos J Leguit; Roel A de Weger; Manon M H Huibers Journal: Hematol Oncol Date: 2017-12-06 Impact factor: 5.271
Authors: Bernard L Marini; Lydia L Benitez; Andrew H Zureick; Ralph Salloum; Angela C Gauthier; Julia Brown; Yi-Mi Wu; Dan R Robinson; Chandan Kumar; Robert Lonigro; Pankaj Vats; Xuhong Cao; Katayoon Kasaian; Bailey Anderson; Brendan Mullan; Benjamin Chandler; Joseph R Linzey; Sandra I Camelo-Piragua; Sriram Venneti; Paul E McKeever; Kathryn A McFadden; Andrew P Lieberman; Noah Brown; Lina Shao; Marcia A S Leonard; Larry Junck; Erin McKean; Cormac O Maher; Hugh J L Garton; Karin M Muraszko; Shawn Hervey-Jumper; Jean M Mulcahy-Levy; Adam Green; Lindsey M Hoffman; Katie Dorris; Nicholas A Vitanza; Joanne Wang; Jonathan Schwartz; Rishi Lulla; Natasha Pillay Smiley; Miriam Bornhorst; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Patricia L Robertson; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Rajen Mody; Carl Koschmann Journal: Transl Res Date: 2017-08-10 Impact factor: 7.012
Authors: Francisco Martínez-Ricarte; Regina Mayor; Elena Martínez-Sáez; Carlota Rubio-Pérez; Estela Pineda; Esteban Cordero; Marta Cicuéndez; Maria A Poca; Nuria López-Bigas; Santiago Ramon Y Cajal; María Vieito; Joan Carles; Josep Tabernero; Ana Vivancos; Soledad Gallego; Francesc Graus; Juan Sahuquillo; Joan Seoane Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-04-03 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Giulia Siravegna; Elena Geuna; Benedetta Mussolin; Giovanni Crisafulli; Alice Bartolini; Danilo Galizia; Laura Casorzo; Ivana Sarotto; Maurizio Scaltriti; Anna Sapino; Alberto Bardelli; Filippo Montemurro Journal: ESMO Open Date: 2017-10-09
Authors: Tina Y Huang; Andrea Piunti; Rishi R Lulla; Jin Qi; Craig M Horbinski; Tadanori Tomita; C David James; Ali Shilatifard; Amanda M Saratsis Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun Date: 2017-04-17 Impact factor: 7.801
Authors: Zachary Miklja; Viveka Nand Yadav; Rodrigo T Cartaxo; Ruby Siada; Chase C Thomas; Jessica R Cummings; Brendan Mullan; Stefanie Stallard; Alyssa Paul; Amy K Bruzek; Kyle Wierzbicki; Tao Yang; Taylor Garcia; Ian Wolfe; Marcia Leonard; Patricia L Robertson; Hugh Jl Garton; Daniel R Wahl; Hemant Parmar; Jann N Sarkaria; Cassie Kline; Sabine Mueller; Theodore Nicolaides; Chana Glasser; Sarah Es Leary; Sriram Venneti; Chandan Kumar-Sinha; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Rajen Mody; Manjunath P Pai; Timothy N Phoenix; Bernard L Marini; Carl Koschmann Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Diana M Carvalho; Peter J Richardson; Nagore Olaciregui; Reda Stankunaite; Cinzia Lavarino; Valeria Molinari; Elizabeth A Corley; Daniel P Smith; Ruth Ruddle; Adam Donovan; Akos Pal; Florence I Raynaud; Sara Temelso; Alan Mackay; John P Overington; Anne Phelan; David Sheppard; Andrew Mackinnon; Bassel Zebian; Safa Al-Sarraj; Ashirwad Merve; Jeremy Pryce; Jacques Grill; Michael Hubank; Ofelia Cruz; Andres Morales La Madrid; Sabine Mueller; Angel M Carcaboso; Fernando Carceller; Chris Jones Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2021-09-22 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Riccardo Soffietti; Chetan Bettegowda; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Katherine E Warren; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; John F De Groot; Evanthia Galanis; Mark R Gilbert; Kurt A Jaeckle; Emilie Le Rhun; Roberta Rudà; Joan Seoane; Niklas Thon; Yoshie Umemura; Michael Weller; Martin J van den Bent; Michael A Vogelbaum; Susan M Chang; Patrick Y Wen Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 13.029
Authors: Amy K Bruzek; Karthik Ravi; Ashwath Muruganand; Jack Wadden; Clarissa May Babila; Evan Cantor; Leo Tunkle; Kyle Wierzbicki; Stefanie Stallard; Robert P Dickson; Ian Wolfe; Rajen Mody; Jonathan Schwartz; Andrea Franson; Patricia L Robertson; Karin M Muraszko; Cormac O Maher; Hugh J L Garton; Tingtin Qin; Carl Koschmann Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Elisa Izquierdo; Paula Proszek; Giulia Pericoli; Sara Temelso; Matthew Clarke; Diana M Carvalho; Alan Mackay; Lynley V Marshall; Fernando Carceller; Darren Hargrave; Birgitta Lannering; Zdenek Pavelka; Simon Bailey; Natacha Entz-Werle; Jacques Grill; Gilles Vassal; Daniel Rodriguez; Paul S Morgan; Tim Jaspan; Angela Mastronuzzi; Mara Vinci; Michael Hubank; Chris Jones Journal: Neurooncol Adv Date: 2021-01-27