Literature DB >> 29067216

Genotyping tumour DNA in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma of a HER2-positive breast cancer patient with brain metastases.

Giulia Siravegna1, Elena Geuna2, Benedetta Mussolin1, Giovanni Crisafulli1,3, Alice Bartolini1, Danilo Galizia2, Laura Casorzo1, Ivana Sarotto1, Maurizio Scaltriti4,5, Anna Sapino1,6, Alberto Bardelli1,3, Filippo Montemurro2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Central nervous system (CNS) involvement contributes to significant morbidity and mortality in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and represents a major challenge for clinicians. Liquid biopsy of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-derived circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) harbours clinically relevant genomic alterations in patients with CNS metastases and could be effective in tracking tumour evolution.
METHODS: In a HER2-positive mBC patient with brain metastases, we applied droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and next-generation whole exome sequencing (WES) analysis to measure ctDNA dynamic changes in CSF and plasma collected during treatment.
RESULTS: Baseline CSF-derived ctDNA analysis revealed TP53 and PIK3CA mutations as well as ERBB2 and cMYC amplification. Post-treatment ctDNA analysis showed decreased markers level in plasma, consistent with extra-CNS disease control, while increased in the CSF, confirming poor treatment benefit in the CNS. DISCUSSION: Analysis of ctDNA in the CSF of HER2-positive mBC is feasible and could represent a useful companion for clinical management of brain metastases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HER2 positive; breast cancer; cerebrospinal fluid; heterogeneity; liquid biopsy

Year:  2017        PMID: 29067216      PMCID: PMC5640139          DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ESMO Open        ISSN: 2059-7029


What is already known about this subject?

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-derived circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) harbours clinically relevant genomic alterations in breast cancer patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases and could be effective in tracking tumour evolution in the CNS (liquid biopsy).

What does this study add?

In this clinical case, ctDNA dynamic changes in plasma and CSF were more informative than traditional imaging in monitoring the disease. Furthermore, ctDNA from the CSF provided hints on potential biomarkers of CNS metastatisation.

How might this impact on clinical practice?

Paired plasma and CSF-based liquid biopsy could be useful to optimise the management of women with metastatic, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer who often show differential treatment benefits in CNS and extra-CNS sites.

Introduction

Survival of patients with metastatic, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer has been considerably extended due to the introduction of HER2-directed therapies such as the monoclonal antibodies trastuzumab and pertuzumab, the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and the tyrosine-kinase inhibitor lapatinib.1 Unfortunately, HER2-positive breast cancer cells have tropism for the central nervous system (CNS), which is considered a sanctuary site where the activity of current anti-HER2 treatment is suboptimal.2 3 Consequently, although the most common initial clinical presentation of metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer is with extra-CNS metastases (ie, lung and liver), CNS progression occurs in a substantial proportion of patients during the course of the disease.4 As a matter of fact, enhanced and prolonged extra-CNS disease control, achieved by HER2 targeting, results in high incidence of CNS progression. This occurrence, that here we call ‘neurosystemic dissociation’ of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC), remains a major challenge for medical oncologists, and research is striving to find strategies to prevent overt CNS metastases or to treat them more effectively.5 Markers that could allow early diagnosis and treatment of this disease are mandatory. Liquid biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure that allows the identification and analysis of circulating tumour-derived DNA (ctDNA) that is shed from tumour cells in body fluids.6 7 Here we describe a clinical case of HER2-positive mBC patient with a ‘neurosystemic dissociation’ documented by paired ctDNA analysis in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and in the plasma, and we discuss the potentialities of this approach in the management of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

Methods

Study oversight

The patient provided informed consent for an institutional review board-approved protocol for longitudinal collection of plasma and CSF and genomic profiling on tumour DNA.

Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid collection

At least 10 mL of whole blood and 4 mL of CSF were collected by blood draw (using EDTA as anticoagulant) and lumbar puncture, respectively. Plasma was separated and CSF was cleaned within 4 hours through two different centrifugation steps (the first at room temperature for 10 min at 1600×g and the second at 3000×g for the same time and temperature). Plasma and CSF were stored at −80°C until ctDNA extraction.

Circulating DNA (ctDNA) isolation

ctDNA was extracted from plasma and CSF using the QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Additional and detailed materials and methods are provided in online supplementary file 1.

Results

Report of the case

A 32-year-old woman presented in October 2004 with a left-sided breast invasive ductal carcinoma (figure 1A). Modified radical mastectomy was performed and the pathology report documented a stage IIB (pT1c, pN1a), poorly differentiated (G3), invasive mixed carcinoma (not-special type-40% and micropapillary-60%, figure 1B, C) estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2 positive (figure 1D). Adjuvant therapy consisted of anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy, followed by tamoxifen plus ovarian function suppression for 5 years. Seven years later, a fine-needle aspiration of an enlarged supraclavicular lymph-node confirmed breast cancer recurrence, with a cytological (figure 1C) and immunophenotypical pattern consistent with that of the primary tumour (ER 11%, PR 12%, HER2 3+). Restaging by CT scan detected both lung and bone metastases. The patient was treated with a chemo-free approach within a phase 2 trial conducted at our institution with Trastuzumab (T) single agent, for a total of 51 3-weekly doses of T, achieving a partial response as best response.8 Then, for lung disease progression, she started a first-line chemotherapy with docetaxel (75 mg/m2)+T for eight cycles and then T maintenance therapy. After 2 years she presented with headache, reduced flexion of lower limbs and gait disturbance. CT scan showed multiple cerebral and cerebellar cortico-subcortical contrast-enhancing lesions, compatible with CNS metastases and regrowth of bone and lung metastases. She then received whole brain radiotherapy (30 Gy/10 fractions) and oral corticosteroids. On completion of radiation therapy, she started a third-line systemic treatment with capecitabine (2000 mg/m2, from day 1 to day 14)-lapatinib (1250 mg, every day) achieving partial response within 4 months. Nine months later, epileptic seizures occurred and a CT scan and MRI documented a CNS progression with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. She therefore started a fourth line of treatment with the antibody-drug conjugate T-DM1, which was stopped after three cycles for worsening of neurological symptoms. At the time of neurological deterioration, MRI showed stable disease in the CNS and CT scan showed a sustained partial remission in extra-CNS disease sites (neurosystemic dissociation). Unfortunately, the patient died 20 months after the initial diagnosis of CNS metastases. Since the evidence of CNS progression we collected multiple plasma samples and two paired CSF samples by lumbar puncture, one before and the other after the three cycles with T-DM1.
Figure 1

(A) Timeline of the patient’s clinical events and interventions. (B) H&E of ductal non-special type (NST) (I) and micropapillary (V) components of the primary mixed invasive breast cancer. Immunostaining: Oestrogen and progesterone receptors are positive in about 10% of the nuclei of ductal NST (II and III) and in 70% (VI) and 40% (VII) of micropapillary subtype respectively. HER2 immunostaining is intense and complete (score 3+) in both histotypes (IV, VIII). (C) H&E staining of cell block section of fine needle aspiration (FNA) of supraclavicular lymph node showing micropapillary (blue) and glandular structures (yellow). (D) ERBB2 gene amplification by FISH in breast cancer cells. Red dots indicate the ERBB2 gene probe, and green signals represent the CEP17 reference probe. Magnification: 100x. (E) ddPCR analysis of matched plasma and CSF-derived ctDNA prior to T-DM1 treatment. BC, breast cancer; BSC, best supportive care; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; ctDNA, circulating tumour DNA; EC-P, Epi-doxorubicin 90 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 q21 days for four cycles followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 q21days for four cycles; FFPE, formalin fixed, paraffin embedded; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridisation; HERLAP, HERceptin or LAPatinib trial; OFS, ovarian function suppression; PD, progressive disease; RT, radiation therapy; T-DM1, trastuzumab emtansine; CNV, copy number variation.

(A) Timeline of the patient’s clinical events and interventions. (B) H&E of ductal non-special type (NST) (I) and micropapillary (V) components of the primary mixed invasive breast cancer. Immunostaining: Oestrogen and progesterone receptors are positive in about 10% of the nuclei of ductal NST (II and III) and in 70% (VI) and 40% (VII) of micropapillary subtype respectively. HER2 immunostaining is intense and complete (score 3+) in both histotypes (IV, VIII). (C) H&E staining of cell block section of fine needle aspiration (FNA) of supraclavicular lymph node showing micropapillary (blue) and glandular structures (yellow). (D) ERBB2 gene amplification by FISH in breast cancer cells. Red dots indicate the ERBB2 gene probe, and green signals represent the CEP17 reference probe. Magnification: 100x. (E) ddPCR analysis of matched plasma and CSF-derived ctDNA prior to T-DM1 treatment. BC, breast cancer; BSC, best supportive care; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; ctDNA, circulating tumour DNA; EC-P, Epi-doxorubicin 90 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 q21 days for four cycles followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 q21days for four cycles; FFPE, formalin fixed, paraffin embedded; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridisation; HERLAP, HERceptin or LAPatinib trial; OFS, ovarian function suppressionPD, progressive disease; RT, radiation therapy; T-DM1, trastuzumab emtansine; CNV, copy number variation.

Molecular-based liquid biopsy analyses

We first analysed CSF ctDNA collected before T-DM1 treatment. Whole exome sequencing (WES) revealed a TP53 p.R248Q mutation (FA 56.16%), a PIK3CA p.R93W mutation (FA 44.18%), cMYC amplification (3.6X). Positivity for HER2 overexpression was confirmed by the detection of high copy number of the ERBB2 exons (15.2X) (figure 2A). MYC amplification was later confirmed by FISH analysis (figure 2B).
Figure 2

(A) WES of CSF-derived ctDNA collected prior to T-DM1 treatment. Only point mutations reported in COSMIC database are shown (left panel) together with complete copy number profile (right panel). (B) MYC gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). Multiple red signals relative to MYC gene are present in breast cancer nuclei. Magnification: 100x. CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; ctDNA, circulating tumour DNA; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridisation; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; T-DM1, trastuzumab emtansine; WES, whole exome sequencing.

(A) WES of CSF-derived ctDNA collected prior to T-DM1 treatment. Only point mutations reported in COSMIC database are shown (left panel) together with complete copy number profile (right panel). (B) MYC gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). Multiple red signals relative to MYC gene are present in breast cancer nuclei. Magnification: 100x. CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; ctDNA, circulating tumour DNA; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridisation; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; T-DM1, trastuzumab emtansine; WES, whole exome sequencing. We next analysed the corresponding primary tumour tissue. In both the not-special type and micropapillary components, WES analysis confirmed the presence of the TP53 p.R248Q mutation and amplification of ERBB2 and cMYC (figure 3 and see online supplementary figure 1). Notably, the PIK3CA p.R93W variant found in the CSF was detected only in the micropapillary component of the tumour and not in the non-special tumour tissue (figure 3 and see online supplementary figure 2).
Figure 3

Analysis of CSF and plasma-derived ctDNA and primary breast tumours. Heatmap of the non-silent genetic alterations (top panel) from each of the specimens collected is shown. Violet-scale colour key for MAFs is shown. CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; ctDNA, circulating tumour DNA; MAFs, mutant allelic frequencies; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

Analysis of CSF and plasma-derived ctDNA and primary breast tumours. Heatmap of the non-silent genetic alterations (top panel) from each of the specimens collected is shown. Violet-scale colour key for MAFs is shown. CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; ctDNA, circulating tumour DNA; MAFs, mutant allelic frequencies; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells. To describe clonal dynamics in plasma ctDNA collected during treatment, we designed ddPCR assays for each of the molecular alterations found in CSF and tumour tissue. cMYC amplification was not detected in plasma ctDNA samples. Conversely, ERBB2 amplification, TP53 and PIK3CA mutations were detectable at the time of concomitant CNS and lung progression (figure 3). Plasma ctDNA collected before and after treatment with T-DM1 showed continuously decreasing ERBB2 levels and TP53 and PIK3CA frequency of mutations, which was consistent with imaging showing extra-CNS disease control. In parallel, CSF genomic profiling recapitulated the clinical course of the disease in the CNS, with no benefit from T-DM1 treatment. Indeed, CSF-derived ctDNA analysis revealed high copy number for MYC and ERRB2 and high frequency of mutations for TP53 and PIK3CA at both timepoints, confirming a molecular non-response to T-DM1 treatment (figure 3).

Discussion

This case report underscores the potentialities of CSF-derived ctDNA analysis in the management of patients with HER2-positive mBC. The emergence of CNS metastases in the context of extracerebral disease control represents one of the major challenges for medical oncologists dealing with this disease (neurosystemic dissociation). Newer tools to personalise and monitor the efficacy of treatments are therefore needed in this particular population. In this clinical case, at the time of the second CSF progression, we opted for T-DM1 having the patient exhausted other treatment options and because of preclinical and clinical data suggesting T-DM1 potential activity in CNS metastases.9 10 Although we collected paired blood and CSF ctDNA samples over a narrow window in this patient’s medical history, we show that CSF ctDNA levels follow tumour burden variation, being, in this specific case, even more informative and sensitive than traditional imaging. Indeed, persistence of high levels of ctDNA in the CSF predicted neurological deterioration during T-DM1 treatment. Conversely, extra-CNS sustained response was paralleled by a significant drop of molecular alterations detectable in plasma samples, as an effect of the antitumour activity of T-DM1. An interesting finding of our analyses was that WES of CSF detected the repertoire of genetic alterations of this patient’s mixed histology tumour, including one mutation (PI3KCA p.R93W) which was exclusively present in the micropapillary component. We speculate that the micropapillary component of her tumour, known for being more aggressive than the ductal type,11 may have metastasised systemically and in CNS sites. This outlines the potentialities of ctDNA analysis of CSF in designing strategies to identify subjects at increased risk of CNS involvement. While exome sequencing in paired plasma ctDNA failed to identify this PIK3CA mutation, the latter could be detected in the baseline plasma sample by targeted ddPCR.

Conclusion

We report that paired analysis of plasma and CSF ctDNA might be useful in the management of women with HER2-positive mBC. CSF ctDNA levels follow tumour burden variations, being potentially more informative and sensitive than traditional imaging. Analysis of CSF ctDNA could represent, therefore, a minimally invasive approach for monitoring progression and response to treatment of CNS lesions, in particular within the ‘neurosystemic dissociation’ phenomenon, which frequently occurs during HER2 targeted treatments. Furthermore, next generation sequencing of CSF ctDNA may be highly sensitive in identifying the mutational repertoire of a metastatic tumour. This may be valuable in designing tailored treatments for CNS disease, in generating hypotheses on the clonal evolution of metastatic disease and in identifying molecular markers of CNS-tropism.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Liquid biopsies: genotyping circulating tumor DNA.

Authors:  Luis A Diaz; Alberto Bardelli
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Potential biomarkers of long-term benefit from single-agent trastuzumab or lapatinib in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Filippo Montemurro; Aleix Prat; Valentina Rossi; Giorgio Valabrega; Jeff Sperinde; Caterina Peraldo-Neia; Michela Donadio; Patricia Galván; Anna Sapino; Massimo Aglietta; José Baselga; Maurizio Scaltriti
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 3.  HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Sibylle Loibl; Luca Gianni
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Central nervous system metastases in women who receive trastuzumab-based therapy for metastatic breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Johanna C Bendell; Susan M Domchek; Harold J Burstein; Lyndsay Harris; Jerry Younger; Irene Kuter; Craig Bunnell; Montse Rue; Rebecca Gelman; Eric Winer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: high incidence of lymph node metastasis with extranodal extension and its immunohistochemical profile compared with invasive ductal carcinoma.

Authors:  O Zekioglu; Y Erhan; M Ciris; H Bayramoglu; N Ozdemir
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  Preclinical Efficacy of Ado-trastuzumab Emtansine in the Brain Microenvironment.

Authors:  Vasileios Askoxylakis; Gino B Ferraro; David P Kodack; Mark Badeaux; Ram C Shankaraiah; Giorgio Seano; Jonas Kloepper; Trupti Vardam; John D Martin; Kamila Naxerova; Divya Bezwada; Xiaolong Qi; Martin K Selig; Elena Brachtel; Dan G Duda; Peigen Huang; Dai Fukumura; Jeffrey A Engelman; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Developmental therapeutics for patients with breast cancer and central nervous system metastasis: current landscape and future perspectives.

Authors:  R Costa; B A Carneiro; D A Wainwright; C A Santa-Maria; P Kumthekar; Y K Chae; W J Gradishar; M Cristofanilli; F J Giles
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 51.769

8.  Evaluating Cancer of the Central Nervous System Through Next-Generation Sequencing of Cerebrospinal Fluid.

Authors:  Elena I Pentsova; Ronak H Shah; Jiabin Tang; Adrienne Boire; Daoqi You; Samuel Briggs; Antonio Omuro; Xuling Lin; Martin Fleisher; Christian Grommes; Katherine S Panageas; Fanli Meng; S Duygu Selcuklu; Shahiba Ogilvie; Natalie Distefano; Larisa Shagabayeva; Marc Rosenblum; Lisa M DeAngelis; Agnes Viale; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Michael F Berger
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Brain Metastases in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Allison M Martin; Daniel N Cagney; Paul J Catalano; Laura E Warren; Jennifer R Bellon; Rinaa S Punglia; Elizabeth B Claus; Eudocia Q Lee; Patrick Y Wen; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Brian M Alexander; Nancy U Lin; Ayal A Aizer
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 31.777

10.  Intrinsic Subtype Switching and Acquired ERBB2/HER2 Amplifications and Mutations in Breast Cancer Brain Metastases.

Authors:  Nolan Priedigkeit; Ryan J Hartmaier; Yijing Chen; Damir Vareslija; Ahmed Basudan; Rebecca J Watters; Roby Thomas; Jose P Leone; Peter C Lucas; Rohit Bhargava; Ronald L Hamilton; Juliann Chmielecki; Shannon L Puhalla; Nancy E Davidson; Steffi Oesterreich; Adam M Brufsky; Leonie Young; Adrian V Lee
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 31.777

  10 in total
  20 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic Clinical Trials in Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: Barriers and Innovations.

Authors:  Jawad Fares; Deepak Kanojia; Aida Rashidi; Atique U Ahmed; Irina V Balyasnikova; Maciej S Lesniak
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Current and Emerging Applications of Droplet Digital PCR in Oncology: An Updated Review.

Authors:  Susana Olmedillas-López; Rocío Olivera-Salazar; Mariano García-Arranz; Damián García-Olmo
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 4.074

3.  Serial ctDNA Monitoring to Predict Response to Systemic Therapy in Metastatic Gastrointestinal Cancers.

Authors:  Aparna R Parikh; Amikasra Mojtahed; Jaime L Schneider; Katie Kanter; Emily E Van Seventer; Isobel J Fetter; Ashraf Thabet; Madeleine G Fish; Bezaye Teshome; Kathryn Fosbenner; Brandon Nadres; Heather A Shahzade; Jill N Allen; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; David P Ryan; Bruce Giantonio; Lipika Goyal; Ryan D Nipp; Eric Roeland; Colin D Weekes; Jennifer Y Wo; Andrew X Zhu; Dora Dias-Santagata; A John Iafrate; Jochen K Lennerz; Theodore S Hong; Giulia Siravegna; Nora Horick; Jeffrey W Clark; Ryan B Corcoran
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Emerging Immunotherapies in the Treatment of Brain Metastases.

Authors:  Edwin Nieblas-Bedolla; Naema Nayyar; Mohini Singh; Ryan J Sullivan; Priscilla K Brastianos
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-11-10

Review 5.  ctDNA-Based Liquid Biopsy of Cerebrospinal Fluid in Brain Cancer.

Authors:  Laura Escudero; Francisco Martínez-Ricarte; Joan Seoane
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 6.  Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment for Leptomeningeal Disease in Melanoma.

Authors:  Yolanda Piña; Sirisha Yadugiri; Debra N Yeboa; Sherise D Ferguson; Peter A Forsyth; Isabella C Glitza Oliva
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 7.  Circulating Tumor DNA in Precision Oncology and Its Applications in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Maria F Arisi; Efrat Dotan; Sandra V Fernandez
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 8.  Therapy of breast cancer brain metastases: challenges, emerging treatments and perspectives.

Authors:  Nuria Kotecki; Florence Lefranc; Daniel Devriendt; Ahmad Awada
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 8.168

9.  CSF H3F3A K27M circulating tumor DNA copy number quantifies tumor growth and in vitro treatment response.

Authors:  Stefanie Stallard; Masha G Savelieff; Kyle Wierzbicki; Brendan Mullan; Zachary Miklja; Amy Bruzek; Taylor Garcia; Ruby Siada; Bailey Anderson; Benjamin H Singer; Rintaro Hashizume; Angel M Carcaboso; Kaitlin Q McMurray; Jason Heth; Karin Muraszko; Patricia L Robertson; Rajen Mody; Sriram Venneti; Hugh Garton; Carl Koschmann
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol Commun       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 7.801

10.  Liquid biopsy for HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastasis: the role of the cerebrospinal fluid.

Authors:  Leticia De Mattos-Arruda
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2017-10-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.