| Literature DB >> 30111335 |
Hashini Nilushika Galappaththi-Arachchige1,2, Siphosenkosi G Zulu3, Elisabeth Kleppa4, Kristine Lillebo4, Erik Qvigstad5,6, Patricia Ndhlovu7, Birgitte Jyding Vennervald8, Svein Gunnar Gundersen9,10, Eyrun Floerecke Kjetland4,11, Myra Taylor11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: South African young women continue to be vulnerable, with high prevalence of teenage pregnancy, HIV, sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and female genital schistosomiasis (FGS). This study seeks to examine the underlying factors that may be associated with these four adverse reproductive health outcomes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30111335 PMCID: PMC6094577 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-018-0581-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Health ISSN: 1742-4755 Impact factor: 3.223
Fig. 1Flowchart showing participant selection procedure
Household structure, educational and socio-economic characteristics of the study participants
| Proportion of participants | |
|---|---|
| Household structure | |
| Median number of people in the household (range) | 6 (1–18) |
| Median number of adults (≥18 years) in the household (range) | 4 (0–14) |
| Median number of children in the household (range) | 2 (0–11) |
| Living with both of her biological parents | 19.8% (279/1411) |
| Living with one of the biological parents or other adults | 80.0% (1129/1411) |
| Did not have any adults in the household | 0.2% (3/1411) |
| Participants 18 years or older were the only adult in the household | 1.3% (19/1411) |
| Highest level of education in the household (excluding study participant) | |
| High School | 88.0% (1236/1404) |
| Tertiary level of education | 12.0% (168/1404) |
| Proportion of adults employed in the household | |
| No adults employed | 43.1% (607/1408) |
| 1–49% of adults employed | 30.8% (424/1408) |
| ≥ 50% of adults employed | 26.1% (367/1408) |
Logistic regression analysis of STIs, social and behavioural factors associated with pregnancy
| Social and behavioural factors | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) a |
|---|---|---|
| Age in years | 1.76 (1.60–1.95)** | 2.10 (1.84–2.39)** |
| Living with both parents | 0.57 (0.42–0.76)** | 0.39 (0.26–0.59)** |
| Level of education in the household b | 0.90 (0.66–1.23) | |
| Percentage of adults employed in the household | 0.95 (0.86–1.04) | |
| Sexual debut before 16 years of age | 1.56 (1.22–1.98)** | 3.64 (2.56–5.17) ** |
| Ever been sexually abused | 1.17 (0.79–1.74) | |
| Ever been paid to have sex | 1.65 (0.79–3.42) | |
| Number of lifetime sexual partners | 0.97 (0.89–1.05) | |
| Have a steady partner now | 0.56 (0.35–0.90)* | 0.44 (0.25–0.78)* |
| Age difference to oldest sexual partner | 1.01 (0.98–1.04) | |
| Age difference to older partner (years) | ||
| Age-homogenous (0–4) | 1 | |
| Intragenerational (5–9) | 1.09 (0.86–1.38) | |
| Intergenerational (≥ 10) | 1.64 (0.98–2.77) | |
| Currently using hormonal contraceptive | 16.18 (11.9–22.00)** | 18.28 (12.99–25.74) ** |
| Know what an STI is | 1.23 (1.00–1.62) | |
| Tested positive for an STI at our clinicc | 1.01 (0.82–1.26) | |
| Tested positive for HIV at our clinic | 1.26 (0.95–1.66) | |
| Taking illicit drugs | 1.00 (0.58–1.73) | |
| Alcohol debut age (stratified by current age) | ||
| Current age 16 | 1.14 (0.67–1.94) | |
| Current age 17 | 0.95 (0.75–1.20) | |
| Current age 18 | 0.92 (0.77–1.11) | |
| Current age 19 | 0.90 (0.75–1.10) | |
| Current age 20 | 0.86 (0.70–1.06) | |
CI confidence interval
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.001
aAll variables in the table with p < 0.05 in univariate analysis were included in the multivariable analyses
bCategorised as secondary (grade 8–12) or tertiary
cTested for C. trachomatis, T. vaginalis, N. gonorrhoea and T. pallidum
Logistic regression analysis of STIs, social and behavioural factors associated with HIV
| Social and behavioural factors | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI)a |
|---|---|---|
| Age in years | 1.31 (1.16–1.47)** | 1.21 (1.06–1.40)* |
| Living with both parents | 0.55 (0.36–0.86)* | 0.65 (0.40–1.10) |
| Level of education in the household b | 0.71 (0.45–1.11) | |
| Percentage of adults employed in the household | 0.96 (0.85–1.09) | |
| Sexual debut before 16 years of age | 0.97 (0.87–1.07) | |
| Number of lifetime sexual partners | 1.27 (1.13–1.42)** | 1.17 (1.04–1.31)* |
| Have a steady partner | 1.13 (0.58–2.18) | |
| Age difference to older partner (years) | ||
| Age-homogenous (≤ 4) | 1 | 1 |
| Intragenerational (5–9) | 1.58 (1.16–2.15)* | 1.51 (1.06–2.15)* |
| Intergenerational (≥ 10) | 2.46 (1.37–4.40)* | 2.06 (1.05–4.06)* |
| Ever been sexually abused | 1.55 (0.96–2.49) | |
| Ever been paid to have sex | 2.12 (0.96–4.70) | |
| Condom used during last sexual intercourse | 1.50 (1.11–2.04)* | 1.60 (1.16–2.20)* |
| Using hormonal contraceptive | 0.84 (0.62–1.15) | |
| Know what an STI is | 1.24 (0.89–1.71) | |
| Number of times treated for an STI | 1.60 (1.27–2.01)** | 1.32 (1.02–1.71)* |
| Taking illicit drugs | 1.99 (1.07–3.69)* | 1.43 (0.65–3.11) |
| Alcohol debut age | ||
| 16 | 2.32 (0.92–5.80) | |
| 17 | 1.27 (0.93–1.70) | |
| 18 | 1.07 (0.81–1.40) | |
| 19 | 1.23 (0.97–1.56) | |
| 20 | 1.08 (0.86–1.35) | |
CI confidence interval
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.001
aAll variables in the table with p < 0.05 in univariate analysis were included in the multivariable analyses
bCategorised as secondary (grade 8–12) or tertiary
Number of concurrent sexually transmitted infections
| Number of STIsa | Participants (%)b |
|---|---|
| No STIs | 719/1259 (57.1) |
| Single STI | 401/1259 (31.9) |
| Two concurrent STIs | 115/1259 (9.1) |
| Three concurrent STIs | 23/1259 (1.8) |
| Four concurrent STIs | 1/1259 (0.1) |
aTested for C. trachomatis, T. vaginalis, N. gonorrhoea and T. pallidum
bParticipants with any missing lab results were excluded
Fig. 2Venn diagram showing the number of participants having co-ocurring adverse reproductive health outcomes. STI = Sexually transmitted infections (C. trachomatis, T. vaginalis, N. Gonorrhoea and T. pallidum,) HIV = Human Immunodefiency virus, FGS = Female genital schistomiasis