Andrew Medina-Marino1,2,3, Joseph Daniels4, Dana Bezuidenhout1, Remco Peters1, Thato Farirai5, Jean Slabbert5, Geoffrey Guloba5, Suzanne Johnson5, Linda-Gail Bekker2, Nkhensani Nkhwashu5. 1. Research Unit, Foundation for Professional Development, East London, South Africa. 2. The Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. 3. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA. 4. Department of Psychiatry and Human Behaviors, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 5. Community-based HIV Counselling and Testing Program, Foundation for Professional Development, Pretoria, South Africa.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Facility-based HIV testing services (HTS) have been less acceptable and accessible by adolescents, men and key populations in South Africa. Community-based HIV counselling and testing (CBCT) modalities, including mobile unit and home-based testing, have been proposed to decrease barriers to HIV testing uptake. CBCT modalities and approaches may be differentially acceptable to men and women based on age. Implementation of multimodal CBCT services may improve HIV testing rates among adolescents and men, and support the roll-out of prevention services. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using aggregate, routine programmatic data collected from 1 October 2015 through 31 March 2017 from a multimodal, at-scale CBCT programme implemented in 12 high-burden districts throughout South Africa. Data collection tools were aligned to reporting standards for the National Department of Health and donor requirements. HIV testing rates (i.e. number of tests performed per 100,000 population using South African census data) and testing proportions by modality were stratified by sex, age groups and heath districts. Descriptive statistics were performed using STATA 13.0. RESULTS: Overall, 944,487 tests were performed during the 1.5-year testing period reported. More tests were conducted among females than males (53.6% vs. 46.4%). Overall, 8206 tests per 100,000 population (95% CI: 8190.2 to 8221.9) were performed; female-to-male (F:M) testing ratio was 1.11. Testing rates were highest among young women age 20 to 24 years (16,328.4; 95% CI: 16,237.9 to 16,419.1) and adolescent girls aged 15 to 19 years (12,817.0; 95% CI: 12,727.9 to 12,906.6). Home-based testing accounted for 61.3% of HIV tests, followed by near-home mobile unit testing (30.2%) and workplace mobile unit testing (4.7%). More women received HTS via home-based testing (F:M ratio = 1.29), whereas more men accessed work-place mobile testing (M:F ratio = 1.35). No sex differential was observed among those accessing near-home mobile testing (F:M ratio = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent implementation of multiple, targeted CBCT modalities can reduce sex disparities in HIV testing in South Africa. Given the acceptability and accessibility of these CBCT services to adolescent girls and young women, evident from their high testing rates, leveraging community-based services delivery platforms to increase access to HIV prevention services, including pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), should be considered.
INTRODUCTION: Facility-based HIV testing services (HTS) have been less acceptable and accessible by adolescents, men and key populations in South Africa. Community-based HIV counselling and testing (CBCT) modalities, including mobile unit and home-based testing, have been proposed to decrease barriers to HIV testing uptake. CBCT modalities and approaches may be differentially acceptable to men and women based on age. Implementation of multimodal CBCT services may improve HIV testing rates among adolescents and men, and support the roll-out of prevention services. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using aggregate, routine programmatic data collected from 1 October 2015 through 31 March 2017 from a multimodal, at-scale CBCT programme implemented in 12 high-burden districts throughout South Africa. Data collection tools were aligned to reporting standards for the National Department of Health and donor requirements. HIV testing rates (i.e. number of tests performed per 100,000 population using South African census data) and testing proportions by modality were stratified by sex, age groups and heath districts. Descriptive statistics were performed using STATA 13.0. RESULTS: Overall, 944,487 tests were performed during the 1.5-year testing period reported. More tests were conducted among females than males (53.6% vs. 46.4%). Overall, 8206 tests per 100,000 population (95% CI: 8190.2 to 8221.9) were performed; female-to-male (F:M) testing ratio was 1.11. Testing rates were highest among young women age 20 to 24 years (16,328.4; 95% CI: 16,237.9 to 16,419.1) and adolescent girls aged 15 to 19 years (12,817.0; 95% CI: 12,727.9 to 12,906.6). Home-based testing accounted for 61.3% of HIV tests, followed by near-home mobile unit testing (30.2%) and workplace mobile unit testing (4.7%). More women received HTS via home-based testing (F:M ratio = 1.29), whereas more men accessed work-place mobile testing (M:F ratio = 1.35). No sex differential was observed among those accessing near-home mobile testing (F:M ratio = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent implementation of multiple, targeted CBCT modalities can reduce sex disparities in HIV testing in South Africa. Given the acceptability and accessibility of these CBCT services to adolescent girls and young women, evident from their high testing rates, leveraging community-based services delivery platforms to increase access to HIV prevention services, including pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), should be considered.
Keywords:
HIV testing services; HIV testing uptake; South Africa; adolescent girls and young women; community-based HIV counselling and testing; sex disparities
Authors: Ruanne V Barnabas; Heidi van Rooyen; Elioda Tumwesigye; Pamela M Murnane; Jared M Baeten; Hilton Humphries; Bosco Turyamureeba; Philip Joseph; Meighan Krows; James P Hughes; Connie Celum Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 12.767
Authors: Olivier Koole; Sharon Tsui; Fred Wabwire-Mangen; Gideon Kwesigabo; Joris Menten; Modest Mulenga; Andrew Auld; Simon Agolory; Ya Diul Mukadi; Robert Colebunders; David R Bangsberg; Eric van Praag; Kwasi Torpey; Seymour Williams; Jonathan Kaplan; Aaron Zee; Julie Denison Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2014-09-17 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Vlad Novitsky; Hermann Bussmann; Lillian Okui; Andrew Logan; Sikhulile Moyo; Erik van Widenfelt; Mompati Mmalane; Quanhong Lei; Molly P Holme; Joseph Makhema; Shahin Lockman; Victor Degruttola; M Essex Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2015-05-29 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Adamson S Muula; Thabale J Ngulube; Seter Siziya; Cecilia M Makupe; Eric Umar; Hans Walter Prozesky; Charles S Wiysonge; Ronald H Mataya Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2007-04-25 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: D Allen Roberts; Diego Cuadros; Alain Vandormael; Dickman Gareta; Ruanne V Barnabas; Kobus Herbst; Frank Tanser; Adam Akullian Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2022-09-30 Impact factor: 20.999