| Literature DB >> 30110351 |
Daniel C Rearick1, Lena Telgmann2, Holger Hintelmann2, Paul C Frost3, Marguerite A Xenopoulos3.
Abstract
Studies of the fate and <span class="Disease">toxicity of nanoparticles, including nano<span class="Chemical">silver (AgNPs), have been primarily conducted using bench scale studies over relatively short periods of time. To better understand the fate of AgNPs in natural aquatic ecosystems over longer time scales and ecological settings, we released suspensions of AgNPs (30-50 nm, capped with polyvinylpyrrolidone) into a boreal lake at the Experimental Lakes Area in Canada. Approximately 9 kg of silver was added from a shoreline point source from June to October 2014, which resulted in total Ag (TAg) concentrations of about 10 μg L-1 or less. In addition, dissolved Ag concentrations (DAg) were typically very low. Using single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (sp-ICP-MS) analysis of grab samples, we found that the nanoparticles typically ranged in the 40-60 nm size class and were widely distributed throughout the lake, while larger aggregates (i.e. >100 nm) were infrequently detected. The highest occurrence of aggregates was found near the addition site; however, size distributions did not vary significantly among spatial locations or time suggesting rapid dispersal upon entry into the lake. Lake stratification at the thermocline was not a barrier to mobility of the AgNPs, as the particles were also detected in the hypolimnion. Environmental factors influenced Ag size distributions over sampling locations and time. Total dissolved phosphorus, bacterioplankton chlorophyll-a, and sampling time strongly correlated with aggregation and dissolution dynamics. AgNPs thus appear to be relatively mobile and persistent over the growing season in lake ecosystems.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30110351 PMCID: PMC6093604 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201412
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Mean annual particle size fractions across sampling site.
Size distributions are presented as percent of total particles detected by averaging temporal intervals. Sites are presented as a surface horizontal gradient from the addition site to the lake outflow (A) and vertically within in the lake at the center buoy location (B). Site abbreviations are the following: Point Source (P.S)., 0.1km from the point source (0.1 km P.S.), littoral site near lake outflow (Out), epilimnion (Epi), metalimnion (Meta), and Hypolimnion (Hypo).
Fig 2Box plots of Ag temporal variation among sampling dates.
Ag size classes are presented as: (A) >100nm, (B) 40–100 nm, and (C) 40–60 nm sizes. Box plots are defined by 25th and 75th percentiles with a median line. Error bars represent 10th to 90th percentiles.
Fig 3Spatial distribution of dissolved Ag concentrations (μg L-1).
Dissolved Ag is presented as: A. horizontal and B. vertical lake gradients after AgNP addition in 2014. Dissolved Ag was determined during sp-ICP-MS as denoted by changes to background Ag content. Vertical dashed lines represent the fall turnover date in the lake.
Fig 4Spatial distribution of total Ag concentrations (μg L-1).
Total Ag is presented as: (A) horizontal and (B) vertical lake gradients after AgNP addition in 2014. Vertical dashed lines represent the fall turnover date in the lake.
Fig 5Dissolved to total Ag ratio detected across sampling locations and dates.
Data are presented as: (A) surface linear gradient from the addition location, 0.1 km from P.S., center buoy, and the lake outflow, and (B) vertical gradient spanning the thermal lake profile from samples taken at the epilimnion, metalimnion, and hypolimnion. Vertical dashed lines represent the fall turnover date in the lake.
Fig 6PLS regression plot of weights for Ag size classes with environmental factors.
The figure shows the relationship between Ag size class (Y) with X-variables classified by their predictive influence using VIP scores. Data were defined as highly influential (black circles) and moderately influential (white circles) for X-variables with the predicted Y-variable designated as a white square. Subpanels represent size classes as: (A) 40–60 nm, (B) 60–100 nm, (C) >100 nm, and (D) Dissolved Ag. Criteria for influence strength were defined as highly influential (VIP>1) and moderately influential (VIP = 1 to 0.8) as established by Gudasz et al., 2012.