Literature DB >> 22680837

Biotic and abiotic interactions in aquatic microcosms determine fate and toxicity of Ag nanoparticles: part 2-toxicity and Ag speciation.

Audrey J Bone1, Benjamin P Colman, Andreas P Gondikas, Kim M Newton, Katherine H Harrold, Rose M Cory, Jason M Unrine, Stephen J Klaine, Cole W Matson, Richard T Di Giulio.   

Abstract

To study the effects of complex environmental media on silver nanoparticle (AgNP) toxicity, AgNPs were added to microcosms with freshwater sediments and two species of aquatic plants (Potamogeton diversifolius and Egeria densa), followed by toxicity testing with microcosm surface water. Microcosms were designed with four environmental matrices in order to determine the contribution of each environmental compartment to changes in toxicity: water only (W), water + sediment (WS), water + plants (WP), and water + plants + sediment (WPS). Silver treatments included AgNPs with two different coatings, gum arabic (GA-AgNPs) or polyvinylpyrollidone (PVP-AgNPs), as well as AgNO(3). Water samples taken from the microcosms at 24 h postdosing were used in acute toxicity tests with two standard model organisms, early life stage zebrafish (Danio rerio) and Daphnia magna. Speciation of Ag in these samples was analyzed using Ag L3-edge X-ray absorption near edge spectroscopy (XANES). Silver speciation patterns for the nanoparticle treatments varied significantly by coating type. While PVP-AgNPs were quite stable and resisted transformation across all matrices (>92.4% Ag(0)), GA-AgNP speciation patterns suggest significantly higher transformation rates, especially in treatments with plants (<69.2% and <58.8% Ag(0) in WP and WPS, respectively) and moderately increased transformation with sediments (<85.6% Ag(0)). Additionally, the presence of plants in the microcosms (with and without sediments) reduced both the concentration of Ag in the water column and toxicity for all Ag treatments. Reductions in toxicity may have been related to decreased water column concentrations as well as changes in the surface chemistry of the particles induced by organic substances released from the plants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22680837     DOI: 10.1021/es204683m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  13 in total

Review 1.  Analytical approaches to support current understanding of exposure, uptake and distributions of engineered nanoparticles by aquatic and terrestrial organisms.

Authors:  Carolin Schultz; Kate Powell; Alison Crossley; Kerstin Jurkschat; Peter Kille; A John Morgan; Daniel Read; William Tyne; Elma Lahive; Claus Svendsen; David J Spurgeon
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Toxicity of two types of silver nanoparticles to aquatic crustaceans Daphnia magna and Thamnocephalus platyurus.

Authors:  Irina Blinova; Jukka Niskanen; Paula Kajankari; Liina Kanarbik; Aleksandr Käkinen; Heikki Tenhu; Olli-Pekka Penttinen; Anne Kahru
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Chronic and pulse exposure effects of silver nanoparticles on natural lake phytoplankton and zooplankton.

Authors:  Jennifer L Vincent; Michael J Paterson; Beth C Norman; Evan P Gray; James F Ranville; Andrew B Scott; Paul C Frost; Marguerite A Xenopoulos
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Dynamic silver speciation as studied with fluorous-phase ion-selective electrodes: Effect of natural organic matter on the toxicity and speciation of silver.

Authors:  Maral P S Mousavi; Ian L Gunsolus; Carlos E Pérez De Jesús; Mitchell Lancaster; Kadir Hussein; Christy L Haynes; Philippe Bühlmann
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Environmental effects of nanosilver: impact on castor seed germination, seedling growth, and plant physiology.

Authors:  Jyothsna Yasur; Pathipati Usha Rani
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  Molecular toxicity mechanism of nanosilver.

Authors:  Danielle McShan; Paresh C Ray; Hongtao Yu
Journal:  J Food Drug Anal       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 6.157

7.  Activity Variation of Phanerochaete chrysosporium under Nanosilver Exposure by Controlling of Different Sulfide Sources.

Authors:  Zhi Guo; Guiqiu Chen; Lingzhi Liu; Guangming Zeng; Zhenzhen Huang; Anwei Chen; Liang Hu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Spatial and temporal trends in the fate of silver nanoparticles in a whole-lake addition study.

Authors:  Daniel C Rearick; Lena Telgmann; Holger Hintelmann; Paul C Frost; Marguerite A Xenopoulos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An adaptable mesocosm platform for performing integrated assessments of nanomaterial risk in complex environmental systems.

Authors:  Mélanie Auffan; Marie Tella; Catherine Santaella; Lenka Brousset; Christine Paillès; Mohamed Barakat; Benjamin Espinasse; Ester Artells; Julien Issartel; Armand Masion; Jérôme Rose; Mark R Wiesner; Wafa Achouak; Alain Thiéry; Jean-Yves Bottero
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Mechanisms of silver nanoparticle toxicity to the coastal marine diatom Chaetoceros curvisetus.

Authors:  Pablo Lodeiro; Thomas J Browning; Eric P Achterberg; Aurélie Guillou; Mohammad S El-Shahawi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.