Literature DB >> 22452441

Biotic and abiotic interactions in aquatic microcosms determine fate and toxicity of Ag nanoparticles. Part 1. Aggregation and dissolution.

Jason M Unrine1, Benjamin P Colman, Audrey J Bone, Andreas P Gondikas, Cole W Matson.   

Abstract

To better understand their fate and toxicity in aquatic environments, we compared the aggregation and dissolution behavior of gum arabic (GA) and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) coated Ag nanoparticles (NPs) in aquatic microcosms. There were four microcosm types: surface water; water and sediment; water and aquatic plants; or water, sediment, and aquatic plants. Dissolution and aggregation behavior of AgNPs were examined using ultracentrifugation, ultrafiltration, and asymmetrical flow field flow fractionation coupled to ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy, dynamic and static laser light scattering, and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Plants released dissolved organic matter (DOM) into the water column either through active or passive processes in response to Ag exposure. This organic matter fraction readily bound Ag ions. The plant-derived DOM had the effect of stabilizing PVP-AgNPs as primary particles, but caused GA-AgNPs to be removed from the water column, likely by dissolution and binding of released Ag ions on sediment and plant surfaces. The destabilization of the GA-AgNPs also corresponded with X-ray absorption near edge spectroscopy results which suggest that 22-28% of the particulate Ag was associated with thiols and 5-14% was present as oxides. The results highlight the potential complexities of nanomaterial behavior in response to biotic and abiotic modifications in ecosystems, and may help to explain differences in toxicity of Ag observed in realistic exposure media compared to simplified laboratory exposures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22452441     DOI: 10.1021/es204682q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  18 in total

Review 1.  Analytical approaches to support current understanding of exposure, uptake and distributions of engineered nanoparticles by aquatic and terrestrial organisms.

Authors:  Carolin Schultz; Kate Powell; Alison Crossley; Kerstin Jurkschat; Peter Kille; A John Morgan; Daniel Read; William Tyne; Elma Lahive; Claus Svendsen; David J Spurgeon
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 2.  Mechanisms of Silver Nanoparticle Release, Transformation and Toxicity: A Critical Review of Current Knowledge and Recommendations for Future Studies and Applications.

Authors:  Bogumiła Reidy; Andrea Haase; Andreas Luch; Kenneth A Dawson; Iseult Lynch
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Toxicity of two types of silver nanoparticles to aquatic crustaceans Daphnia magna and Thamnocephalus platyurus.

Authors:  Irina Blinova; Jukka Niskanen; Paula Kajankari; Liina Kanarbik; Aleksandr Käkinen; Heikki Tenhu; Olli-Pekka Penttinen; Anne Kahru
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Silver near municipal wastewater discharges into western Lake Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Chris D Metcalfe; Tamanna Sultana; Jonathan Martin; Karla Newman; Paul Helm; Sonya Kleywegt; Li Shen; Viviane Yargeau
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Silver toxicity across salinity gradients: the role of dissolved silver chloride species (AgCl x ) in Atlantic killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus) and medaka (Oryzias latipes) early life-stage toxicity.

Authors:  Cole W Matson; Audrey J Bone; Mélanie Auffan; T Ty Lindberg; Mariah C Arnold; Heileen Hsu-Kim; Mark R Wiesner; Richard T Di Giulio
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Chronic and pulse exposure effects of silver nanoparticles on natural lake phytoplankton and zooplankton.

Authors:  Jennifer L Vincent; Michael J Paterson; Beth C Norman; Evan P Gray; James F Ranville; Andrew B Scott; Paul C Frost; Marguerite A Xenopoulos
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Dynamic silver speciation as studied with fluorous-phase ion-selective electrodes: Effect of natural organic matter on the toxicity and speciation of silver.

Authors:  Maral P S Mousavi; Ian L Gunsolus; Carlos E Pérez De Jesús; Mitchell Lancaster; Kadir Hussein; Christy L Haynes; Philippe Bühlmann
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Environmental effects of nanosilver: impact on castor seed germination, seedling growth, and plant physiology.

Authors:  Jyothsna Yasur; Pathipati Usha Rani
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Controlling silver nanoparticle exposure in algal toxicity testing--a matter of timing.

Authors:  Sara Nørgaard Sørensen; Anders Baun
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 5.913

10.  An adaptable mesocosm platform for performing integrated assessments of nanomaterial risk in complex environmental systems.

Authors:  Mélanie Auffan; Marie Tella; Catherine Santaella; Lenka Brousset; Christine Paillès; Mohamed Barakat; Benjamin Espinasse; Ester Artells; Julien Issartel; Armand Masion; Jérôme Rose; Mark R Wiesner; Wafa Achouak; Alain Thiéry; Jean-Yves Bottero
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.