Literature DB >> 31676359

Gene Variants That Affect Levels of Circulating Tumor Markers Increase Identification of Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.

Toshiya Abe1, Chiho Koi1, Shiro Kohi1, Ki-Byung Song1, Koji Tamura1, Anne Macgregor-Das1, Naoki Kitaoka1, Miguel Chuidian1, Madeline Ford1, Mohamad Dbouk1, Michael Borges1, Jin He2, Richard Burkhart2, Christopher L Wolfgang2, Alison P Klein3, James R Eshleman3, Ralph H Hruban3, Marcia Irene Canto4, Michael Goggins5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), and cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) in blood are used as markers to determine the response of patients with cancer to therapy, but are not used to identify patients with pancreatic cancer.
METHODS: We obtained blood samples from 504 patients undergoing pancreatic surveillance from 2002 through 2018 who did not develop pancreatic cancer and measured levels of the tumor markers CA19-9, CEA, CA-125, and thrombospondin-2. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in FUT3, FUT2, ABO, and GAL3ST2 that have been associated with levels of tumor markers were used to establish SNP-defined ranges for each tumor marker. We also tested the association between additional SNPs (in FUT6, MUC16, B3GNT3, FAM3B, and THBS2) with levels of tumor markers. To calculate the diagnostic specificity of each SNP-defined range, we assigned the patients under surveillance into training and validation sets. After determining the SNP-defined ranges, we determined the sensitivity of SNP-adjusted tests for the tumor markers, measuring levels in blood samples from 245 patients who underwent resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from 2010 through 2017.
RESULTS: A level of CA19-9 that identified patients with PDAC with 99% specificity had 52.7% sensitivity. When we set the cut-off levels of CA19-9 based on each SNP, the test for CA19-9 identified patients with PDAC with 60.8% sensitivity and 98.8% specificity. Among patients with FUT3 alleles that encode a functional protein, levels of CA19-9 greater than the SNP-determined cut-off values identified 66.4% of patients with PDAC, with 99.3% specificity. In the validation set, levels of CEA varied among patients with vs without SNP in FUT2, by blood group, and among smokers vs nonsmokers; levels of CA-125 varied among patients with vs without the SNP in GAL3ST2. The use of the SNPs to define the ranges of CEA and CA-125 did not significantly increase the diagnostic accuracy of the assays for these proteins. Combining data on levels of CA19-9 and CEA, CA19-9 and CA-125, or CA19-9 and thrombospondin-2 increased the sensitivity of detection of PDAC, but slightly reduced specificity.
CONCLUSIONS: Including information on SNPs associated with levels of CA19-9, CEA, and CA-125 can improve the diagnostic accuracy of assays for these tumor markers in the identification of patients with PDAC. Clinicaltrials.gov no: NCT02000089.
Copyright © 2020 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnosis; Early Detection; Genotype; Screening

Year:  2019        PMID: 31676359      PMCID: PMC7166164          DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.10.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  32 in total

1.  Pancreatic cancer screening in a prospective cohort of high-risk patients: a comprehensive strategy of imaging and genetics.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Verna; Caroline Hwang; Peter D Stevens; Heidrun Rotterdam; Stavros N Stavropoulos; Carolyn D Sy; Martin A Prince; Wendy K Chung; Robert L Fine; John A Chabot; Harold Frucht
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Smoking and serum CA19-9 levels according to Lewis and secretor genotypes.

Authors:  Sayo Kawai; Koji Suzuki; Kazuko Nishio; Yoshiko Ishida; Rieko Okada; Yasuyuki Goto; Mariko Naito; Kenji Wakai; Yoshinori Ito; Nobuyuki Hamajima
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Lewis and secretor gene dosages affect CA19-9 and DU-PAN-2 serum levels in normal individuals and colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  H Narimatsu; H Iwasaki; F Nakayama; Y Ikehara; T Kudo; S Nishihara; K Sugano; H Okura; S Fujita; S Hirohashi
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Deleterious Germline Mutations Are a Risk Factor for Neoplastic Progression Among High-Risk Individuals Undergoing Pancreatic Surveillance.

Authors:  Toshiya Abe; Amanda L Blackford; Koji Tamura; Madeline Ford; Patrick McCormick; Miguel Chuidian; Jose Alejandro Almario; Michael Borges; Anne Marie Lennon; Eun Ji Shin; Alison P Klein; Ralph H Hruban; Marcia I Canto; Michael Goggins
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  New observations on the utility of CA19-9 as a biomarker in Lewis negative patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Guopei Luo; Zhiyao Fan; He Cheng; Kaizhou Jin; Meng Guo; Yu Lu; Chao Yang; Kun Fan; Qiuyi Huang; Jiang Long; Liang Liu; Jin Xu; Renquan Lu; Quanxing Ni; Andrew L Warshaw; Chen Liu; Xianjun Yu
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.996

6.  Surgical Outcomes After Pancreatic Resection of Screening-Detected Lesions in Individuals at High Risk for Developing Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Marcia Irene Canto; Tossapol Kerdsirichairat; Charles J Yeo; Ralph H Hruban; Eun Ji Shin; Jose Alejandro Almario; Amanda Blackford; Madeline Ford; Alison P Klein; Ammar A Javed; Anne Marie Lennon; Atif Zaheer; Ihab R Kamel; Elliot K Fishman; Richard Burkhart; Jin He; Martin Makary; Matthew J Weiss; Richard D Schulick; Michael G Goggins; Christopher L Wolfgang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Prevalence and Progression of Pancreatic Cystic Precursor Lesions Differ Between Groups at High Risk of Developing Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Ingrid C A W Konings; Femme Harinck; Jan-Werner Poley; Cora M Aalfs; Anja van Rens; Nanda C Krak; Anja Wagner; C Yung Nio; Rolf H Sijmons; Hendrik M van Dullemen; Frank P Vleggaar; Margreet G E M Ausems; Paul Fockens; Jeanin E van Hooft; Marco J Bruno
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.327

8.  FUT2 and FUT3 genotype determines CA19-9 cut-off values for detection of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Authors:  Andreas Wannhoff; Johannes Roksund Hov; Trine Folseraas; Christian Rupp; Kilian Friedrich; Jarl Andreas Anmarkrud; Karl Heinz Weiss; Peter Sauer; Peter Schirmacher; Kirsten Muri Boberg; Wolfgang Stremmel; Tom Hemming Karlsen; Daniel Nils Gotthardt
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 25.083

9.  Screening for pancreatic cancer in a high-risk cohort: an eight-year experience.

Authors:  Wigdan Al-Sukhni; Ayelet Borgida; Heidi Rothenmund; Spring Holter; Kara Semotiuk; Robert Grant; Stephanie Wilson; Malcolm Moore; Steven Narod; Kartik Jhaveri; Masoom A Haider; Steven Gallinger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Benefit of Surveillance for Pancreatic Cancer in High-Risk Individuals: Outcome of Long-Term Prospective Follow-Up Studies From Three European Expert Centers.

Authors:  Hans Vasen; Isaura Ibrahim; Carmen Guillen Ponce; Emily P Slater; Elvira Matthäi; Alfredo Carrato; Julie Earl; Kristin Robbers; Anneke M van Mil; Thomas Potjer; Bert A Bonsing; Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel; Wilma Bergman; Martin Wasser; Hans Morreau; Günter Klöppel; Christoph Schicker; Martin Steinkamp; Jens Figiel; Irene Esposito; Evelina Mocci; Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros; Alfonso Sanjuanbenito; Maria Muñoz-Beltran; José Montans; Peter Langer; Volker Fendrich; Detlef K Bartsch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Inherited Pancreatic Cancer Syndromes and High-Risk Screening.

Authors:  Leah H Biller; Brian M Wolpin; Michael Goggins
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.402

Review 2.  Pancreatic Cancer: Pathogenesis, Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

Authors:  Laura D Wood; Marcia Irene Canto; Elizabeth M Jaffee; Diane M Simeone
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 33.883

3.  Application of green synthesized WO3-poly glutamic acid nanobiocomposite for early stage biosensing of breast cancer using electrochemical approach.

Authors:  Hassan Nasrollahpour; Abdolhossein Naseri; Mohammad-Reza Rashidi; Balal Khalilzadeh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Research Progress and Future Trends of Microfluidic Paper-Based Analytical Devices in In-Vitro Diagnosis.

Authors:  Taiyi Zhang; Feng Ding; Yujing Yang; Gaozhen Zhao; Chuanhao Zhang; Ruiming Wang; Xiaowen Huang
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-03

5.  Tissue metabolomics identified new biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis prediction of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Chang Liu; Henan Qin; Huiying Liu; Tianfu Wei; Zeming Wu; Mengxue Shang; Haihua Liu; Aman Wang; Jiwei Liu; Dong Shang; Peiyuan Yin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  The Multicenter Cancer of Pancreas Screening Study: Impact on Stage and Survival.

Authors:  Mohamad Dbouk; Bryson W Katona; Randall E Brand; Amitabh Chak; Sapna Syngal; James J Farrell; Fay Kastrinos; Elena M Stoffel; Amanda L Blackford; Anil K Rustgi; Beth Dudley; Linda S Lee; Ankit Chhoda; Richard Kwon; Gregory G Ginsberg; Alison P Klein; Ihab Kamel; Ralph H Hruban; Jin He; Eun Ji Shin; Anne Marie Lennon; Marcia Irene Canto; Michael Goggins
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 50.717

Review 7.  Mucins in pancreatic cancer: A well-established but promising family for diagnosis, prognosis and therapy.

Authors:  Shunda Wang; Lei You; Menghua Dai; Yupei Zhao
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 5.310

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.