| Literature DB >> 27631003 |
Laure Brigitte Kouitcheu Mabeku1, Bertrand Eyoum Bille1, Eveline Nguepi2.
Abstract
This study was performed to evaluate the antimicrobial activities of extracts of Bidens pilosa, Galinsoga ciliata, and Eryngium foetidum against 6 clinical strains of Helicobacter pylori in vitro and in vivo. Broth microdilution method was used in vitro. In vivo, Swiss mice were inoculated with H. pylori and divided into 5 groups; the control group received the vehicle and the four others received 125, 250, and 500 mg/kg of methanol extract of Eryngium foetidum and ciprofloxacin (500 mg/kg) for 7 days, respectively. Helicobacter pylori colonization and number of colonies in gastric biopsies culture were assessed on days 1 and 7 after treatment. The lowest MIC value (64 μg/mL) and the best spectrum of bactericidal effect (MBC/MIC = 1) were obtained with the methanol extract of Eryngium foetidum. The number of H. pylori infected animals was 17% (plant-extract) and 0% (ciprofloxacin) compared to 100% for the infected untreated group. Plant-extract (381.9 ± 239.5 CFU) and ciprofloxacin (248 ± 153.2 CFU) significantly reduced bacterial load in gastric mucosa compared to untreated, inoculated mice (14350 ± 690 CFU). Conclusion. The present data provided evidence that methanol extract of Eryngium foetidum could be a rich source of metabolites with antimicrobial activity to fight Helicobacter pylori infections.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27631003 PMCID: PMC5007343 DOI: 10.1155/2016/2171032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Phytochemical screening of methanol extract of E. foetidum.
| Compounds | Methanol extract of |
|---|---|
| Alkaloids | + |
| Flavonoids | + |
| Phenolics | + |
| Saponins | − |
| Tannins | − |
| Triterpenes | − |
| Anthraquinones | + |
| Anthocyanins | − |
| Steroid | + |
+: present; −: absent.
Effects of different doses of E. foetidum and ciprofloxacin on H. pylori gastric colonization of infected and normal mice.
| Treatment group | Tests | 1 day after cessation of treatment | 7 days after cessation of treatment | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Animals number | Animals number | ||||||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Negative (%) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Negative (%) | ||
| Normal | Urease | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 |
| Catalase | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 | |
| Oxidase | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 | |
| Gram st | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 | |
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
| Urease | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 |
| Catalase | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | |
| Oxidase | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | |
| Gram st | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | |
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
| Urease | − | − | − | + | + | + | 50 | − | − | + | + | − | − | 67 |
| Catalase | − | − | − | + | − | − | 83 | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 | |
| Oxidase | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 | |
| Gram st | − | − | − | + | + | − | 67 | − | − | − | + | − | − | 83 | |
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
| Urease | − | + | + | − | − | − | 67 | − | − | − | − | − | + | 83 |
| Catalase | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 | |
| Oxidase | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 | |
| Gram st | − | + | − | − | − | − | 83 | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 | |
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
| Urease | − | − | − | − | − | + | 83 | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 |
| Catalase | − | − | − | − | − | + | 83 | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 | |
| Oxidase | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 | |
| Gram st | − | − | − | − | − | + | 83 | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 | |
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
| Urease | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 |
| Catalase | − | − | − | − | + | − | 83 | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 | |
| Oxidase | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 | |
| Gram st | − | − | − | + | − | − | 83 | − | − | − | − | − | − | 100 | |
All the percentages given in the table are means of the six animals (n = 6) that tested negative per group. (+): positive test; (−): negative test.
Figure 1Effects of different treatment on the recovery of H. pylori from infected mice. Each circle represents the bacterial count for one animal. Inf: infected + vehicle; Inf + Ef 125: infected + E. foetidum pinnatum 125 mg/kg; Inf + Ef 250: infected + E. foetidum 250 mg/kg; Inf + Ef 500: infected + E. foetidum 500 mg/kg; Inf + Cp 500: infected + ciprofloxacin 500 mg/kg; Uninf: normal group. Data column of the different treatment with superscript ∗ are significantly different compared with infected control group ( p < 0.05).
MIC/MBC of crude plant-extracts and antibiotics (µg/mL).
| Crude extracts/antibiotics |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 64/64 | 64/64 | 512/512 | >1024 | >1024 | >1024 |
|
| 256/256 | 512/512 | >1024 | >1024 | >1024 | >1024 |
|
| 1024/1024 | 512/1024 | >1024 | 256/1024 | 512/1024 | 256/512 |
|
| 1024/1024 | >1024 | >1024 | 256/512 | >1024 | 1024/1024 |
|
| 512/1024 | 256/512 | >1024 | >1024 | 128/512 | 256/512 |
|
| 256/512 | >1024 | 256/512 | 256/512 | >1024 | 128/512 |
| Doxycycline | 64/64 | 32/32 | 32/32 | 32/32 | 4/16 | 32/32 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 8/8 | 32/32 | 2/2 | <2 | 16/16 | 8/8 |
| Metronidazole | >128 | >128 | >128 | >128 | >128 | >128 |
All the values given in the table are means of three determinations. MeOH: methanol; AE: ethyl acetate.