Literature DB >> 30099969

How do pig farms maintain low Salmonella prevalence: a case-control study.

R P Smith1, V Andres1, T E Cheney1, F Martelli1, R Gosling1, E Marier2, A Rabie1, D Gilson1, R H Davies1.   

Abstract

Salmonella prevalence in UK pigs is amongst the highest in Europe, highlighting the need to investigate pig farms which have managed to maintain a low Salmonella seroprevalence. A total of 19 pig farms that had a consistently low (<10%) seroprevalence over 4 years (named Platinum farms) were compared against 38 randomly selected Control farms, chosen to match the same distribution of production types and geographical distribution of the Platinum farms. Each farm was visited and floor faeces and environmental samples were collected. It was shown that Control farms had a significantly higher median percentage of pooled faecal samples positive for Salmonella compared with the Platinum farms (12.1% and 0.4% for pooled faecal samples, respectively) and were more likely to have serovars of public health importance detected (S. Typhimurium/ monophasic variants or S. Enteritidis). Considering the comprehensive on-farm sampling, the identification of farms negative for Salmonella, along with the identification of those that had maintained low prevalence over a long period is important. The risk factor analyses identified pelleted feed, feed deliveries crossing farm perimeter and regular antibiotic use as associated with being a Control farm. Performance data indicated that Platinum farms were performing better for slaughter live weight than Controls. Limited assessments of available pig movement records suggested that the source of pigs was not key to Platinum status, but further study would be needed to confirm this finding. These results emphasise that maintaining very low prevalence on UK farms is achievable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pig; Salmonella; risk factor; supplier

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30099969      PMCID: PMC6452989          DOI: 10.1017/S0950268818002248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Infect        ISSN: 0950-2688            Impact factor:   4.434


  25 in total

1.  Assessment of various treatments to reduce carriage of Salmonella in swine.

Authors:  A Letellier; S Messier; L Lessard; S Quessy
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.310

2.  Observations on the introduction and dissemination of Salmonella in three previously low prevalence status pig farms in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Francesca Martelli; Victor M Andres; Rob Davies; Richard P Smith
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 5.516

3.  Salmonella enterica in reptiles of German and Austrian origin.

Authors:  L Geue; U Löschner
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2002-01-03       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  A clinical field trial to evaluate the efficacy of vaccination in controlling Salmonella infection and the association of Salmonella-shedding and weight gain in pigs.

Authors:  Abdolvahab Farzan; Robert M Friendship
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.310

5.  Investigations on prophylactic effects of coarse feed structure and/or potassium diformate on the microflora in the digestive tract of weaned piglets experimentally infected with Salmonella Derby.

Authors:  S Papenbrock; K Stemme; G Amtsberg; J Verspohl; J Kamphues
Journal:  J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl)       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.130

6.  Abattoir based survey of Salmonella in finishing pigs in the United Kingdom 2006-2007.

Authors:  E A Marier; L C Snow; T Floyd; I M McLaren; J Bianchini; A J C Cook; R H Davies
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 2.670

7.  Occurrence of Salmonella serotype Typhimurium DT104 on a commercial swine farm before, during, and after depopulation and repopulation.

Authors:  Matthew M Erdman; Isabel T Harris; Montserrat Torremorell; Vincil M Wilt; D L Hank Harris
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 1.936

8.  Identification and quantification of risk factors in animal management and transport regarding Salmonella spp. in pigs.

Authors:  B R Berends; H A Urlings; J M Snijders; F Van Knapen
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.277

9.  Effect of acidified feed on the prevalence of Salmonella in market-age pigs.

Authors:  E Creus; J F Pérez; B Peralta; F Baucells; E Mateu
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.702

10.  Herd-level risk factors for subclinical Salmonella infection in European finishing-pig herds.

Authors:  D M A Lo Fo Wong; J Dahl; H Stege; P J van der Wolf; L Leontides; A von Altrock; B M Thorberg
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2004-04-16       Impact factor: 2.670

View more
  4 in total

1.  Prevalence of Salmonella by Serological and Direct Detection Methods in Piglets from Inconspicuous, Conspicuous, and Vaccinated Sow Herds.

Authors:  Juhle-Marijke Buch; Christian Visscher; Anton Schulte Zu Sundern; Josef Schulte-Wülwer; Ansgar Deermann; Carolin Holling
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Salmonella Infection in Nursery Piglets and Its Role in the Spread of Salmonellosis to Further Production Periods.

Authors:  María Bernad-Roche; Alejandro Casanova-Higes; Clara M Marín-Alcalá; Alberto Cebollada-Solanas; Raúl C Mainar-Jaime
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-01-25

3.  An Optimized Bacteriophage Cocktail Can Effectively Control Salmonella in vitro and in Galleria mellonella.

Authors:  Janet Y Nale; Gurinder K Vinner; Viviana C Lopez; Anisha M Thanki; Preeda Phothaworn; Parameth Thiennimitr; Angela Garcia; Manal AbuOun; Muna F Anjum; Sunee Korbsrisate; Edouard E Galyov; Danish J Malik; Martha R J Clokie
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 4.  The Fate of Foodborne Pathogens in Manure Treated Soil.

Authors:  Zoe Black; Igori Balta; Lisa Black; Patrick J Naughton; James S G Dooley; Nicolae Corcionivoschi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 5.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.