Literature DB >> 30099218

Deriving risk adjustment payment weights to maximize efficiency of health insurance markets.

Timothy J Layton1, Thomas G McGuire2, Richard C van Kleef3.   

Abstract

Risk-adjustment is critical to the functioning of regulated health insurance markets. To date, estimation and evaluation of a risk-adjustment model has been based on statistical rather than economic objective functions. We develop a framework where the objective of risk-adjustment is to minimize the efficiency loss from service-level distortions due to adverse selection, and we use the framework to develop a welfare-grounded method for estimating risk-adjustment weights. We show that when the number of risk adjustor variables exceeds the number of decisions plans make about service allocations, incentives for service-level distortion can always be eliminated via a constrained least-squares regression. When the number of plan service-level allocation decisions exceeds the number of risk-adjusters, the optimal weights can be found by an OLS regression on a straightforward transformation of the data. We illustrate this method with the data used to estimate risk-adjustment payment weights in the Netherlands (N = 16.5 million).
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse selection; Health insurance; Risk adjustment

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30099218      PMCID: PMC6471663          DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  16 in total

1.  Risk sharing as a supplement to imperfect capitation: a tradeoff between selection and efficiency.

Authors:  E M van Barneveld; L M Lamers; R C van Vliet; W P van de Ven
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Risk adjustment alternatives in paying for behavioral health care under Medicaid.

Authors:  S L Ettner; R G Frank; T G McGuire; R C Hermann
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  The HHS-HCC risk adjustment model for individual and small group markets under the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  John Kautter; Gregory C Pope; Melvin Ingber; Sara Freeman; Lindsey Patterson; Michael Cohen; Patricia Keenan
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2014-05-09

4.  Overpaying morbidity adjusters in risk equalization models.

Authors:  R C van Kleef; R C J A van Vliet; W P M M van de Ven
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-09-29

5.  Predictability and predictiveness in health care spending.

Authors:  Randall P Ellis; Thomas G McGuire
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 6.  Is there one measure-of-fit that fits all? A taxonomy and review of measures-of-fit for risk-equalization models.

Authors:  S H C M van Veen; R C van Kleef; W P M M van de Ven; R C J A van Vliet
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.929

7.  Using Quantile and Asymmetric Least Squares Regression for Optimal Risk Adjustment.

Authors:  Normann Lorenz
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Assessing incentives for service-level selection in private health insurance exchanges.

Authors:  Thomas G McGuire; Joseph P Newhouse; Sharon-Lise Normand; Julie Shi; Samuel Zuvekas
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  Selection in insurance markets: theory and empirics in pictures.

Authors:  Liran Einav; Amy Finkelstein
Journal:  J Econ Perspect       Date:  2011

10.  Improving risk equalization with constrained regression.

Authors:  Richard C van Kleef; Thomas G McGuire; René C J A van Vliet; Wynand P P M van de Ven
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2016-12-10
View more
  7 in total

1.  Sample Selection for Medicare Risk Adjustment Due to Systematically Missing Data.

Authors:  Savannah L Bergquist; Thomas G McGuire; Timothy J Layton; Sherri Rose
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The Comparative Advantage of Medicare Advantage.

Authors:  Joseph P Newhouse; Mary Beth Landrum; Mary Price; J Michael McWilliams; John Hsu; Thomas G McGuire
Journal:  Am J Health Econ       Date:  2019-04-23

3.  Limitations of P-Values and R-squared for Stepwise Regression Building: A Fairness Demonstration in Health Policy Risk Adjustment.

Authors:  Sherri Rose; Thomas G McGuire
Journal:  Am Stat       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 8.710

4.  Measuring efficiency of health plan payment systems in managed competition health insurance markets.

Authors:  Timothy J Layton; Randall P Ellis; Thomas G McGuire; Richard van Kleef
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Use of past care markers in risk-adjustment: accounting for systematic differences across providers.

Authors:  Laura Anselmi; Yiu-Shing Lau; Matt Sutton; Anna Everton; Rob Shaw; Stephen Lorrimer
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-07-31

6.  How to deal with persistently low/high spenders in health plan payment systems?

Authors:  Richard C van Kleef; René C J A van Vliet
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Multivariable prediction models for health care spending using machine learning: a protocol of a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew W Huang; Martin Haslberger; Neto Coulibaly; Omar Galárraga; Arman Oganisian; Lazaros Belbasis; Orestis A Panagiotou
Journal:  Diagn Progn Res       Date:  2022-03-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.