Literature DB >> 29248054

Measuring efficiency of health plan payment systems in managed competition health insurance markets.

Timothy J Layton1, Randall P Ellis2, Thomas G McGuire3, Richard van Kleef4.   

Abstract

Adverse selection in health insurance markets leads to two types of inefficiency. On the demand side, adverse selection leads to plan price distortions resulting in inefficient sorting of consumers across health plans. On the supply side, adverse selection creates incentives for plans to inefficiently distort benefits to attract profitable enrollees. Reinsurance, risk adjustment, and premium categories address these problems. Building on prior research on health plan payment system evaluation, we develop measures of the efficiency consequences of price and benefit distortions under a given payment system. Our measures are based on explicit economic models of insurer behavior under adverse selection, incorporate multiple features of plan payment systems, and can be calculated prior to observing actual insurer and consumer behavior. We illustrate the use of these measures with data from a simulated market for individual health insurance.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse selection; Health insurance; Risk adjustment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29248054      PMCID: PMC5737816          DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  35 in total

1.  Risk adjustment in health insurance and its long-term effectiveness.

Authors:  Konstantin Beck; Maria Trottmann; Peter Zweifel
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Risk equalization in The Netherlands: an empirical evaluation.

Authors:  Richard C Van Kleef; René C J A Van Vliet; Wynand P M M Van de Ven
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  Tradeoffs in the design of health plan payment systems: Fit, power and balance.

Authors:  Michael Geruso; Thomas G McGuire
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Adverse Selection and Inertia in Health Insurance Markets: When Nudging Hurts.

Authors:  Benjamin R Handel
Journal:  Am Econ Rev       Date:  2013-12

5.  HOW MUCH FAVORABLE SELECTION IS LEFT IN MEDICARE ADVANTAGE?

Authors:  Joseph P Newhouse; Mary Price; J Michael McWilliams; John Hsu; Thomas G McGuire
Journal:  Am J Health Econ       Date:  2015

6.  Selection on Moral Hazard in Health Insurance.

Authors:  Liran Einav; Amy Finkelstein; Stephen Ryan; Paul Schrimpf; Mark R Cullen
Journal:  Am Econ Rev       Date:  2013-02

7.  Do Medicare Advantage plans select enrollees in higher margin clinical categories?

Authors:  Joseph P Newhouse; J Michael McWilliams; Mary Price; Jie Huang; Bruce Fireman; John Hsu
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  Integrating risk adjustment and enrollee premiums in health plan payment.

Authors:  Thomas G McGuire; Jacob Glazer; Joseph P Newhouse; Sharon-Lise Normand; Julie Shi; Anna D Sinaiko; Samuel H Zuvekas
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  ESTIMATING WELFARE IN INSURANCE MARKETS USING VARIATION IN PRICES.

Authors:  Liran Einav; Amy Finkelstein; Mark R Cullen
Journal:  Q J Econ       Date:  2010-08-01

10.  Adjusting capitation rates using objective health measures and prior utilization.

Authors:  J P Newhouse; W G Manning; E B Keeler; E M Sloss
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1989
View more
  9 in total

1.  Modest risk-sharing significantly reduces health plans' incentives for service distortion.

Authors:  Shuli Brammli-Greenberg; Jacob Glazer; Ruth Waitzberg
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2019-08-22

2.  Limitations of P-Values and R-squared for Stepwise Regression Building: A Fairness Demonstration in Health Policy Risk Adjustment.

Authors:  Sherri Rose; Thomas G McGuire
Journal:  Am Stat       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 8.710

3.  Improving the Performance of Risk Adjustment Systems: Constrained Regressions, Reinsurance, and Variable Selection.

Authors:  Thomas G McGuire; Anna L Zink; Sherri Rose
Journal:  Am J Health Econ       Date:  2021-10-04

4.  Imperfect risk adjustment, risk preferences, and sorting in competitive health insurance markets.

Authors:  Timothy J Layton
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Risk equalization in competitive health insurance markets: Identifying healthy individuals on the basis of multiple-year low spending.

Authors:  Frank Eijkenaar; René C J A van Vliet; Richard C van Kleef
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  How to deal with persistently low/high spenders in health plan payment systems?

Authors:  Richard C van Kleef; René C J A van Vliet
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Virtual Simulation Design Facing Smart Payment Screen on the Background of Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Yan Li; Xiao Wang
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Selection Incentives for Health Insurers in the Presence of Sophisticated Risk Adjustment.

Authors:  Richard C van Kleef; Frank Eijkenaar; René C J A van Vliet
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.929

9.  Fair regression for health care spending.

Authors:  Anna Zink; Sherri Rose
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.571

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.