Literature DB >> 31263291

Limitations of P-Values and R-squared for Stepwise Regression Building: A Fairness Demonstration in Health Policy Risk Adjustment.

Sherri Rose1, Thomas G McGuire2.   

Abstract

Stepwise regression building procedures are commonly used applied statistical tools, despite their well-known drawbacks. While many of their limitations have been widely discussed in the literature, other aspects of the use of individual statistical fit measures, especially in high-dimensional stepwise regression settings, have not. Giving primacy to individual fit, as is done with p-values and R2, when group fit may be the larger concern, can lead to misguided decision making. One of the most consequential uses of stepwise regression is in health care, where these tools allocate hundreds of billions of dollars to health plans enrolling individuals with different predicted health care costs. The main goal of this "risk adjustment" system is to convey incentives to health plans such that they provide health care services fairly, a component of which is not to discriminate in access or care for persons or groups likely to be expensive. We address some specific limitations of p-values and R2 for high-dimensional stepwise regression in this policy problem through an illustrated example by additionally considering a group-level fairness metric.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fairness; health policy; p-value; risk adjustment; stepwise regression

Year:  2019        PMID: 31263291      PMCID: PMC6602076          DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2018.1518269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Stat        ISSN: 0003-1305            Impact factor:   8.710


  12 in total

1.  Deletion/substitution/addition algorithm in learning with applications in genomics.

Authors:  Sandra E Sinisi; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2004-08-12

2.  Comparison of "risk-adjusted" hospital outcomes.

Authors:  David M Shahian; Sharon-Lise T Normand
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Fair Prediction with Disparate Impact: A Study of Bias in Recidivism Prediction Instruments.

Authors:  Alexandra Chouldechova
Journal:  Big Data       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.128

4.  A Machine Learning Framework for Plan Payment Risk Adjustment.

Authors:  Sherri Rose
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Mental Health Risk Adjustment with Clinical Categories and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Akritee Shrestha; Savannah Bergquist; Ellen Montz; Sherri Rose
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Case-mix adjustment of the CAHPS Hospital Survey.

Authors:  A James O'Malley; Alan M Zaslavsky; Marc N Elliott; Lawrence Zaborski; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Risk-Adjustment Simulation: Plans May Have Incentives To Distort Mental Health And Substance Use Coverage.

Authors:  Ellen Montz; Tim Layton; Alisa B Busch; Randall P Ellis; Sherri Rose; Thomas G McGuire
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Achieving Mental Health Care Parity Might Require Changes In Payments And Competition.

Authors:  Thomas G McGuire
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  CMS Frailty Adjustment Model.

Authors:  John Kautter; Gregory C Pope
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2004

10.  Risk adjustment of Medicare capitation payments using the CMS-HCC model.

Authors:  Gregory C Pope; John Kautter; Randall P Ellis; Arlene S Ash; John Z Ayanian; Lisa I Lezzoni; Melvin J Ingber; Jesse M Levy; John Robst
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2004
View more
  4 in total

1.  Improving the Performance of Risk Adjustment Systems: Constrained Regressions, Reinsurance, and Variable Selection.

Authors:  Thomas G McGuire; Anna L Zink; Sherri Rose
Journal:  Am J Health Econ       Date:  2021-10-04

2.  Use of past care markers in risk-adjustment: accounting for systematic differences across providers.

Authors:  Laura Anselmi; Yiu-Shing Lau; Matt Sutton; Anna Everton; Rob Shaw; Stephen Lorrimer
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-07-31

3.  Fair regression for health care spending.

Authors:  Anna Zink; Sherri Rose
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Intersections of machine learning and epidemiological methods for health services research.

Authors:  Sherri Rose
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 7.196

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.