| Literature DB >> 30096763 |
Zafar Hussain Ibupoto1,2, Aneela Tahira3, Hamid Raza4, Gulzar Ali5, Aftab Ahmed Khand6, Nabila Shah Jilani7, Arfana Begum Mallah8, Cong Yu9, Magnus Willander10.
Abstract
It is always demanded to prepare a nanostructured material with prominent functional properties for the development of a new generation of devices. This study is focused on the synthesis of heart/dumbbell-like CuO nanostructures using a low-temperature aqueous chemical growth method with vitamin B12 as a soft template and growth directing agent. CuO nanostructures are characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) techniques. CuO nanostructures are heart/dumbbell like in shape, exhibit high crystalline quality as demonstrated by XRD, and have no impurity as confirmed by XPS. Apparently, CuO material seems to be porous in structure, which can easily carry large amount of enzyme molecules, thus enhanced performance is shown for the determination of uric acid. The working linear range of the biosensor is 0.001 mM to 10 mM with a detection limit of 0.0005 mM and a sensitivity of 61.88 mV/decade. The presented uric acid biosensor is highly stable, repeatable, and reproducible. The analytical practicality of the proposed uric acid biosensor is also monitored. The fabrication methodology is inexpensive, simple, and scalable, which ensures the capitalization of the developed uric acid biosensor for commercialization. Also, CuO material can be used for various applications such as solar cells, lithium ion batteries, and supercapacitors.Entities:
Keywords: CuO nanostructures; potentiometric response; uric acid biosensor; vitamin B12
Year: 2018 PMID: 30096763 PMCID: PMC6120005 DOI: 10.3390/ma11081378
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1(a–d): SEM images of the vitamin B12 assisted synthesis of CuO nanostructures at different magnifications.
Figure 2The XRD spectrum of the vitamin B12-assisted CuO nanomaterial.
Figure 3The XPS spectra of vitamin B12-assisted CuO nanostructures, (a) wide scan survey of elements present in the sample; (b) Cu 2p; (c) O 1s.
Figure 4(a) The calibration fitting of the potentiometric uric acid biosensor for a concentration range of 0.0001–10 mM uric acid concentration; (b) the repeatability response of the uric acid biosensor in the concentration range of 0.0001–10 mM uric acid.
Figure 5(a) The inter-electrode reproducibility of the uric acid biosensor in 0.1 mM uric acid; (b) the effect of pH on the output potential of the uric acid biosensor in 0.5 mM uric acid; (c) the effect of temperature on the potentiometric response of the uric acid biosensor in 0.5 mM uric acid.
The storage stability proposed uric acid biosensor based on CuO nanostructures.
| No of Weeks | Linear Range Uric Acid (mM) | Sensitivity (mV/Decade) | Limit of Detection Uric Acid (mM) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.001–10 | 61.88 | 0.0005 |
| 2 | 0.002–10 | 61 | 0.0005 |
| 3 | 0.001–10 | 61.58 | 0.0004 |
| 4 | 0.0025–10 | 60 | 0.0003 |
The recovery method results for the analytical reliability of uric acid biosensor.
| Spiked Concentration of Uric Acid (Mm) | Uric Acid Conc. as Quantified by Proposed Biosensor | % Uric Acid Biosensor Recovery |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1.5 | - |
| 1.8 | 2 | 111.11 |
| 3.5 | 3.7 | 105.71 |
| 2.5 | 2.4 | 96 |
| 4.1 | 4.2 | 102.43 |
The calculated selectivity coefficients for the interfering species using separate solution method using 0.1 mM solution of each interfering substance.
| Interfering Species (B) | Log Kpot uric acid, B |
|---|---|
| Ascorbic acid | 2.5 |
| Urea | 1.9 |
| Glucose | 2.25 |
The comparison of presented uric acid biosensor with existing biosensors.
| Electrode Material | Technique | Linear Range mM | Sensitivity mV/Decade | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZnO nanowires | Potentiometry | 0.001–1 | 29 | [ |
| ZnO nanotubes | Potentiometry | 0.05–1.5 | 68 | [ |
| ZnO nanoflakes | Potentiometry | 0.0005–1.5 | 66 | [ |
| ZnO nanorods | Amperometry | 0.005–1 | ---------- | [ |
| ZnO nanoparticles | Amperometry | 0.00–1 | ---------- | [ |
| PEDOT/Palladium | Differential pulse voltammetry | 0.007–0.011 | ---------- | [ |
| PrGO | Differential pulse voltammetry | 0.3 | ---------- | [ |
| Graphene-poly(acridine red)/GCE | Differential pulse voltammetry | 0.008–0.15 | ---------- | [ |
| RGO–AuNPs–CSHMs | Differential pulse voltammetry | 0.001–0.3 | ---------- | [ |
| CuO nanostrucutures | Potentiometery | 0.001–10 | 61 | This work |