Literature DB >> 30090682

INTER-RATER AGREEMENT AND VALIDITY OF A TACKLING PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SCALE IN YOUTH AMERICAN FOOTBALL.

Eric Schussler1, Richard J Jagacinski2, Susan E White2, Ajit M Chaudhari2, John A Buford2, James A Onate2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long term neurologic injury and concussion have been identified as risks from participation in American football. Altering tackling form has been recommended to reduce the risk of neurologic injury caused by head accelerations when tackling. The purpose of this research is to determine the inter-rater agreement and validity of the Qualitative Youth Tackling System (QYTS), a six-item feedback scale to correct tackling form, when utilized by novice and expert raters. HYPOTHESIS: Experienced raters will have higher levels of agreement with each other and with motion capture when compared to novice raters.
METHODS: Both novice and experienced raters viewed video of youth athletes (ages 9-13) tackling a dummy in a laboratory setting along. The raters identified successful performance according to a binary rating scale for each component. Analysis of both the raters' agreement with each other and with an objective motion capture measure were completed.
RESULTS: Fliess' Kappa measures between all raters were found to be moderate for head placement (k=.48), fair for cervical extension (k=.38), trunk inclination (k=.37), shoulder extension (k=.27) and step length (k=.29), and there was no agreement for pelvic height (k=.-16). When compared to the dichotomized validation measures of each of the five components provided by the motion capture system the average Cohen's Kappa agreement was substantial for pelvic height (k=.63), fair for step length (k=.34), cervical extension (k=.40), trunk inclination (k=.35), and slight for shoulder extension (k=.16). The experienced raters outperformed the novice raters in all categories.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that skilled raters are better able to identify the movement patterns included in the QYTS when compared to a validation measure as well have higher rates of inter-rater agreement than novice raters. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3b.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Concussion; Feedback; Football; Motor Learning

Year:  2018        PMID: 30090682      PMCID: PMC6063056     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  18 in total

1.  Reliability of five methods for assessing shoulder range of motion.

Authors:  K Hayes; J R Walton; Z R Szomor; G A Murrell
Journal:  Aust J Physiother       Date:  2001

2.  Visual estimation of finger angles: do we need goniometers?

Authors:  V Rose; C C Nduka; J A Pereira; M A Pickford; H J C R Belcher
Journal:  J Hand Surg Br       Date:  2002-08

3.  Video modeling by experts with video feedback to enhance gymnastics skills.

Authors:  Eva Boyer; Raymond G Miltenberger; Catherine Batsche; Victoria Fogel
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2009

Review 4.  Tackling in Youth Football.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Erroneous knowledge of results affects decision and memory processes on timing tasks.

Authors:  Lawrence J Ryan; Matthew S Fritz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Consistently modeling the same movement strategy is more important than model skill level in observational learning contexts.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Noah Dean
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2013-12-18

7.  Reliability of the landing error scoring system-real time, a clinical assessment tool of jump-landing biomechanics.

Authors:  Darin A Padua; Michelle C Boling; Lindsay J Distefano; James A Onate; Anthony I Beutler; Stephen W Marshall
Journal:  J Sport Rehabil       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.931

8.  Interobserver reproducibility of the visual estimation of range of motion of the shoulder.

Authors:  Caroline B Terwee; Andrea F de Winter; Rob J Scholten; Marielle P Jans; Walter Devillé; Dirkjan van Schaardenburg; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Expert versus novice interrater reliability and criterion validity of the landing error scoring system.

Authors:  James Onate; Nelson Cortes; Cailee Welch; Bonnie L Van Lunen
Journal:  J Sport Rehabil       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.931

10.  The Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) Is a valid and reliable clinical assessment tool of jump-landing biomechanics: The JUMP-ACL study.

Authors:  Darin A Padua; Stephen W Marshall; Michelle C Boling; Charles A Thigpen; William E Garrett; Anthony I Beutler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.