Literature DB >> 30090576

In silico prediction of chemical genotoxicity using machine learning methods and structural alerts.

Defang Fan1, Hongbin Yang1, Fuxing Li1, Lixia Sun1, Peiwen Di1, Weihua Li1, Yun Tang1, Guixia Liu1.   

Abstract

Genotoxicity tests can detect compounds that have an adverse effect on the process of heredity. The in vivo micronucleus assay, a genotoxicity test method, has been widely used to evaluate the presence and extent of chromosomal damage in human beings. Due to the high cost and laboriousness of experimental tests, computational approaches for predicting genotoxicity based on chemical structures and properties are recognized as an alternative. In this study, a dataset containing 641 diverse chemicals was collected and the molecules were represented by both fingerprints and molecular descriptors. Then classification models were constructed by six machine learning methods, including the support vector machine (SVM), naïve Bayes (NB), k-nearest neighbor (kNN), C4.5 decision tree (DT), random forest (RF) and artificial neural network (ANN). The performance of the models was estimated by five-fold cross-validation and an external validation set. The top ten models showed excellent performance for the external validation with accuracies ranging from 0.846 to 0.938, among which models Pubchem_SVM and MACCS_RF showed a more reliable predictive ability. The applicability domain was also defined to distinguish favorable predictions from unfavorable ones. Finally, ten structural fragments which can be used to assess the genotoxicity potential of a chemical were identified by using information gain and structural fragment frequency analysis. Our models might be helpful for the initial screening of potential genotoxic compounds.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 30090576      PMCID: PMC6062245          DOI: 10.1039/c7tx00259a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)        ISSN: 2045-452X            Impact factor:   3.524


  30 in total

1.  In vivo rodent micronucleus assay: protocol, conduct and data interpretation.

Authors:  G Krishna; M Hayashi
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2000-11-20       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Automatic knowledge extraction from chemical structures: the case of mutagenicity prediction.

Authors:  T Ferrari; D Cattaneo; G Gini; N Golbamaki Bakhtyari; A Manganaro; E Benfenati
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  PaDEL-descriptor: an open source software to calculate molecular descriptors and fingerprints.

Authors:  Chun Wei Yap
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  In silico prediction of chemical Ames mutagenicity.

Authors:  Congying Xu; Feixiong Cheng; Lei Chen; Zheng Du; Weihua Li; Guixia Liu; Philip W Lee; Yun Tang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  ChemoPy: freely available python package for computational biology and chemoinformatics.

Authors:  Dong-Sheng Cao; Qing-Song Xu; Qian-Nan Hu; Yi-Zeng Liang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Application of bacterial reverse mutation assay for detection of non-genotoxic carcinogens.

Authors:  Rewan Kanode; Saurabh Chandra; Sharad Sharma
Journal:  Toxicol Mech Methods       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.987

Review 8.  Recent advances in in vivo genotoxicity testing: prediction of carcinogenic potential using comet and micronucleus assay in animal models.

Authors:  Seung Hun Kang; Jee Young Kwon; Jong Kwon Lee; Young Rok Seo
Journal:  J Cancer Prev       Date:  2013-12

9.  QSAR models for CXCR2 receptor antagonists based on the genetic algorithm for data preprocessing prior to application of the PLS linear regression method and design of the new compounds using in silico virtual screening.

Authors:  Tahereh Asadollahi; Shayessteh Dadfarnia; Ali Mohammad Haji Shabani; Jahan B Ghasemi; Maryam Sarkhosh
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 10.  The comet assay for DNA damage and repair: principles, applications, and limitations.

Authors:  Andrew R Collins
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.860

View more
  5 in total

1.  Prediction and Screening Model for Products Based on Fusion Regression and XGBoost Classification.

Authors:  Jiaju Wu; Linggang Kong; Ming Yi; Qiuxian Chen; Zheng Cheng; Hongfu Zuo; Yonghui Yang
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-31

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery: A Comprehensive Review of Data-driven and Machine Learning Approaches.

Authors:  Hyunho Kim; Eunyoung Kim; Ingoo Lee; Bongsung Bae; Minsu Park; Hojung Nam
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  In silico prediction models for thyroid peroxidase inhibitors and their application to synthetic flavors.

Authors:  Mihyun Seo; Changwon Lim; Hoonjeong Kwon
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 2.391

4.  SApredictor: An Expert System for Screening Chemicals Against Structural Alerts.

Authors:  Yuqing Hua; Xueyan Cui; Bo Liu; Yinping Shi; Huizhu Guo; Ruiqiu Zhang; Xiao Li
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 5.545

Review 5.  Machine Learning Based Toxicity Prediction: From Chemical Structural Description to Transcriptome Analysis.

Authors:  Yunyi Wu; Guanyu Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.