Literature DB >> 35958779

Prediction and Screening Model for Products Based on Fusion Regression and XGBoost Classification.

Jiaju Wu1,2, Linggang Kong2, Ming Yi2, Qiuxian Chen2, Zheng Cheng2, Hongfu Zuo1, Yonghui Yang2.   

Abstract

Performance prediction based on candidates and screening based on predicted performance value are the core of product development. For example, the performance prediction and screening of equipment components and parts are an important guarantee for the reliability of equipment products. The prediction and screening of drug bioactivity value and performance are the keys to pharmaceutical product development. The main reasons for the failure of pharmaceutical discovery are the low bioactivity of the candidate compounds and the deficiencies in their efficacy and safety, which are related to the absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) of the compounds. Therefore, it is very necessary to quickly and effectively perform systematic bioactivity value prediction and ADMET property evaluation for candidate compounds in the early stage of drug discovery. In this paper, a data-driven pharmaceutical products screening prediction model is proposed to screen drug candidates with higher bioactivity value and better ADMET properties. First, a quantitative prediction method for bioactivity value is proposed using the fusion regression of LGBM and neural network based on backpropagation (BP-NN). Then, the ADMET properties prediction method is proposed using XGBoost. According to the predicted bioactivity value and ADMET properties, the BVAP method is defined to screen the drug candidates. And the screening model is validated on the dataset of antagonized Erα active compounds, in which the mean square error (MSE) of fusion regression is 1.1496, the XGBoost prediction accuracy of ADMET properties are 94.0% for Caco-2, 95.7% for CYP3A4, 89.4% for HERG, 88.6% for hob, and 96.2% for Mn. Compared with the commonly used methods for ADMET properties such as SVM, RF, KNN, LDA, and NB, the XGBoost in this paper has the highest prediction accuracy and AUC value, which has better guiding significance and can help screen pharmaceutical product candidates with good bioactivity, pharmacokinetic properties, and safety.
Copyright © 2022 Jiaju Wu et al.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35958779      PMCID: PMC9357736          DOI: 10.1155/2022/4987639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci


  30 in total

1.  Artificial Intelligence, Big Data and Machine Learning Approaches in Precision Medicine & Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Anuraj Nayarisseri; Ravina Khandelwal; Poonam Tanwar; Maddala Madhavi; Diksha Sharma; Garima Thakur; Alejandro Speck-Planche; Sanjeev Kumar Singh
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 3.465

2.  Development of an in silico prediction model for chemical-induced urinary tract toxicity by using naïve Bayes classifier.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Ji-Xia Ren; Jin-Xiang Ma; Lan Ding
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 2.943

3.  HDAC3i-Finder: A Machine Learning-based Computational Tool to Screen for HDAC3 Inhibitors.

Authors:  Shan Li; Yu Ding; Miaomiao Chen; Ya Chen; Johannes Kirchmair; Zihao Zhu; Song Wu; Jie Xia
Journal:  Mol Inform       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.353

4.  ADMET Evaluation in Drug Discovery. Part 17: Development of Quantitative and Qualitative Prediction Models for Chemical-Induced Respiratory Toxicity.

Authors:  Tailong Lei; Fu Chen; Hui Liu; Huiyong Sun; Yu Kang; Dan Li; Youyong Li; Tingjun Hou
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Benchmarks for interpretation of QSAR models.

Authors:  Mariia Matveieva; Pavel Polishchuk
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.514

6.  Multiple machine learning, molecular docking, and ADMET screening approach for identification of selective inhibitors of CYP1B1.

Authors:  Baddipadige Raju; Himanshu Verma; Gera Narendra; Bharti Sapra; Om Silakari
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 5.235

7.  iBLP: An XGBoost-Based Predictor for Identifying Bioluminescent Proteins.

Authors:  Dan Zhang; Hua-Dong Chen; Hasan Zulfiqar; Shi-Shi Yuan; Qin-Lai Huang; Zhao-Yue Zhang; Ke-Jun Deng
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.238

8.  Development and interpretation of a QSAR model for in vitro breast cancer (MCF-7) cytotoxicity of 2-phenylacrylonitriles.

Authors:  David T Stanton; Jennifer R Baker; Adam McCluskey; Stefan Paula
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 9.  Artificial Intelligence in Drug Design.

Authors:  Gerhard Hessler; Karl-Heinz Baringhaus
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  Liothyronine could block the programmed death-ligand 1 (PDL1) activity: an e-Pharmacophore modeling and virtual screening study.

Authors:  Navid Pourzardosht; Zahra Sadat Hashemi; Maysam Mard-Soltani; Abolfazl Jahangiri; Mohammad Reza Rahbar; Alireza Zakeri; Ebrahim Mirzajani; Saeed Khalili
Journal:  J Recept Signal Transduct Res       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 2.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.