Literature DB >> 30088611

pGVG: a new Gateway-compatible vector for transformation of sugarcane and other monocot crops.

Giovanna V Guidelli1, Lucia Mattiello1, Rafael H Gallinari1, Paulo Cezar de Lucca2, Marcelo Menossi1.   

Abstract

The successful development of genetically engineered monocots using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation has created an increasing demand for compatible vectors. We have developed a new expression vector, pGVG, for efficient transformation and expression of different constructs for gene overexpression and silencing in sugarcane. The pCAMBIA2300 binary vector was modified by adding Gateway recombination sites for fast gene transfer between vectors and the maize polyubiquitin promoter Ubi-1 (ZmUbi1), which is known to drive high gene expression levels in monocots. Transformation efficiency using the pGVG vector reached up to 14 transgenic events per gram of transformed callus. Transgenic plants expressing the β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene from pGVG showed high levels of GUS activity. qRT-PCR evaluations demonstrated success for both overexpression and hairpin-based silencing cassettes. Therefore, pGVG is suitable for plant transformation and subsequent applications for high-throughput production of stable transgenic sugarcane. The use of an expression cassette based on the ZmUbi1 promoter opens the possibility of using pGVG in other monocot species.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30088611      PMCID: PMC6082244          DOI: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2017-0262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Mol Biol        ISSN: 1415-4757            Impact factor:   1.771


Sugarcane (Saccharum spp L.) is one of the most economically important crops due to its bioenergetic potential and is recognized as a source of renewable energy (Gianotto ). Genetic transformation methods are powerful biotechnological tools to improve yield and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, initially restricted to dicots, has been successfully used in many monocot plants (Gelvin, 2003; Shrawat and Lörz, 2006; Hiei ; Slamet-Loedin ; Mayavan ). This method became one of the main approaches used to produce transgenic plants due to its simplicity, low-cost equipment needs and delivery of one or few copies of larger gene insertions. Furthermore the transfer DNA has greater stability, favoring its heritability in comparison to other transformation methods (Elliott ; Hansen and Wright, 1999; Travella ). Despite that, the availability of vector system compatible for monocots is limited, and most expression vectors are based on the CaMV 35S promoter, which generates lower expression levels in monocots (Mann ). There are other vectors for monocot transformation, however they are limited to gene silencing (Karimi ), lack epitope tags for protein detection/isolation (Mann ), present ZmUbi1 promoter driving both gene of interest and selection cassettes, which can cause gene silencing (De Wilde ; Butaye ; Himmelbach ; Mann ) or show regeneration problems due to the use of hygromycin selection (Joyce ). In this study, we describe the construction and functional validation of a vector (pGVG) for gene functional analysis in sugarcane and other monocots. The pGVG vector (Figure 1) is based on the backbone from pCAMBIA2300 binary vector (CAMBIA, Canberra, Australia) that possesses the NPTII gene as selection marker. The latter is one of the most efficient markers for transgenic sugarcane callus selection and certified for use in commercial transgenic species (Zhangsun ; Joyce ). The pGVG vector presents a Gateway cassette (attR1-Cmr-ccdB-attR2) under control of the ZmUbi1 promoter and CaMV 35S terminator for gene overexpression or silencing. By incorporating the Gateway cloning technology, pGVG allows a fast and easy exchange of DNA fragments between vectors, without using restriction endonucleases and ligases from traditional cloning. Target DNA flanked by attL recombination sites is easily transferred to attR site-compatible destination vectors using the LR clonase enzyme. In this process, the lethal ccdB gene is moved from the destination plasmid to the entry vector, facilitating the selection of recombinant constructions (Katzen, 2007). Entry vectors such as pCR8GW TOPO (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, USA), with resistance to spectinomycin, are suitable for direct recombination with pGVG. In cases where both entry and pGVG destination vectors have the same bacterial selectable marker it is indicated to use the PCR product flanked by the recombination sites to assure high efficiency of recombination. The ZmUbi1 promoter was cloned in pGVG with the 5’ untranslated region and the first intron of the Ubi-1 gene, which is associated with enhanced transgene expression in monocot (Callis ; Bruce and Quail, 1990; McElroy ; Vasil ; Christensen and Quail, 1996). This promoter allows high levels of gene expression or RNAi-mediated suppression in most tissue types during most stages of plant development (Cornejo ; Mann ), and is used to produce stable transgenic monocot plants (Gallo-Meagher and Irvine, 1996; Ma ; Kinkema ). Additionally, pGVG presents a FLAG-tag sequence (DYKDDDDK) inserted upstream of the CaMV 35S terminator for C-terminal fusion with the target protein.
Figure 1

Schematic structure of the pGVG vector. This vector contains the backbone from pCAMBIA2300, modified by the insertion of the ZmUbi1 promoter (including 5’ untranslated exon and first intron) for strong transgene overexpression and the CaMV 35S terminator. The sequences from the Gateway system were inserted between the ZmUBi1 promoter and the CaMV 35S terminator. A FLAG-tag was positioned upstream the terminator to facilitate target protein isolation. The vector also contains the NPTII gene as plant selectable marker under control of the enhanced CaMV 35S promoter. Cmr: chloramphenicol-resistance gene. ccdB: lethal gene. RB: right border. LB: left border.

To produce transgenic lines, sugarcane plants (SP80-3280) were cultivated in greenhouse (IAC, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil) for six months, and the meristematic region from shoot apex was used to generate explants. This material was cultivated in MS maintenance medium [4.33 g/L MS salts (Murashige and Skoog, 1962), 1 mL/L MS vitamins, 0.15 g/L citric acid, 0.5 g/L casein hydrolysate, 25 g/L sucrose, 12 g/L mannitol, 100 mg/L proline, 3 mg/L 2-4 dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and 2.8 g/L phytagel] at 26 °C in the dark, until the generation of embryogenic calli. Several constructs based on pGVG (see below) were transferred to Agrobacterium tumefaciens (EHA105 strain) by heat shock. Bacterial cultures were incubated with sugarcane calli under vacuum pressure for 5 min and transferred to co-cultivation medium (4.33 g/L MS salts, 1 mL/L MS vitamins, 3 mg/L 2,4-D, 0.15 g/L citric acid, 25 g/L sucrose and 3.5 g/L phytagel) at 22 °C, in the dark for 3 days. Subsequently, the calli were kept in resting medium (4.33 g/L MS salts, 1 mL/L MS vitamins, 3 mg/L 2,4-D, 0.5 g/L casein hydrolysate, 0.15 g/L citric acid, 25 g/L sucrose, 100 mg/L proline, 2.8 g/L phytagel and 200 mg/mL timentin) at 26 °C, in the dark for 6 days. Following the resting phase, the transformed calli were transferred to a selective regeneration medium [4.33 g/L MS salts, 1 mL/L MS vitamins, 25 g/L sucrose, 5 mg/mL CuSO4, 1 mg/mL benzylaminopurine (BAP), 7 g/L agar, 200 mg/mL timentin and 40 mg/L geneticin] at 26 °C, during 14 days with 16 h photoperiod. The transgenic events were kept in medium without phytohormones (4.33 g/L MS salts, 1 mL/L MS vitamins, 25 g/L sucrose, 7 g/L agar, 200 mg/mL timentin and 40 mg/L geneticin) to induce growth and rooting. Plants transformed with pGVG empty vector and wild-type plants were used as negative controls. The functionality of pGVG was evaluated using the GUS reporter gene. The coding sequence of GUS gene was amplified from the construction pENTR -gus (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), using specific primers designed in the attL Gateway recombination sites. The purified PCR product was recombined with pGVG using Gateway® LR Clonase® II enzyme (Invitrogen, Life Technologies). The resulting vector was introduced into Agrobacterium and used for calli transformation. Transgene expression was assessed by GUS histochemical staining (Jefferson, 1987). Strong GUS activity was detected in callus and whole plants (Figure 2), confirming that pGVG is suitable for sugarcane transformation.
Figure 2

GUS expression on transgenic sugarcane tissues obtained from Agrobacterium-mediated transformation system using the pGVG vector. Transformed (A) and untransformed (B) calli, three weeks after the co-culture period; (C) leaves from a transformed (left) and untransformed (right) plant; (D) transformed (GUS, pGVG empty) and untransformed (Wild Type) plants, 4 months after the co-culture period.

To further evaluate the transformation capacity of pGVG, sugarcane genes related with different biological processes were tested using overexpression and RNAi-mediated silencing constructs (Table 1). The vector was able to transform sugarcane plants with genes of different sizes for both construct types. The overall transformation efficiency showed variation, probably reflecting differences in callus quality, culture medium, age and selective subculturing, which affect both transformation and plant regeneration (Pacurar ; Basnayake ).
Table 1

Transformation efficiency in sugarcane using pGVG.

Gene functionType of cassettea EventsCallus (g)Efficiencyb Construct size (bp)
Gene 1 - Drought stressOE1531510.20573
Gene 2 - Drought stressOE2151514.331,185
Gene 3 - Drought stressOE142159.46384
Gene 4 - Drought stressOE71154.73453
Gene 5 - Drought stressOE85108.50243
Gene 6 - Drought stressOE59105.90849
Gene 7 - Drought stressOE1251012.50942
Gene 8 - Drought stressOE89108.90609
Gene 9 - GrowthOE75107.501,086
Genes 9, 10 and 11 - GrowthHS71107.10892
Gene 9 - GrowthHS84108.40632
Gene 12 - Cell wall biosynthesisHS42152.801,125
Gene 13 - Cell wall biosynthesisHS129158.60923
Gene 14 - Cell wall biosynthesisHS1821512.13605
Genes 15, 16 and 17 - DevelopmentHS24151.602,795
Genes 15 and 16 - DevelopmentHS80108.001,314
pGVGEmpty vector3074.291,455
pGVGEmpty vector651.201,455
pGVGEmpty vector1572.141,455

OE: overexpression, HS: hairpin silencing;

Transformation efficiency expressed as the number of transgenic plants per gram of fresh callus matter.

OE: overexpression, HS: hairpin silencing; Transformation efficiency expressed as the number of transgenic plants per gram of fresh callus matter. Analyses of gene expression were performed through qRT-PCR using gene-specific primers and the polyubiquitin gene (SCCCST2001G02.g) as internal control for normalization (Papini-Terzi ) (Figure 3). The results demonstrated that sugarcane genes 1 and 2 were up-regulated in different levels in the transgenic lines when compared with endogenous levels observed in the empty vector control (Figure 3A,B). Additionally, a unique hairpin construction that targets three genes of the same family (genes 15, 16 and 17) silenced each member reaching up to 92% of down-regulation (Figure 3C). These data show that pGVG is able to produce efficient transgene overexpression and suppression of target genes.
Figure 3

Expression levels of different sugarcane genes induced or repressed in transgenic sugarcane plants using the pGVG vector. Leaves from transgenic plants were used to extract RNA and the transcripts were quantified using RT-qPCR (A) Overexpression of gene 1 (drought stress-related) in three independent lines (E1, E2, and E3) compared with control (pGVG empty). (B) Overexpression of gene 2 (drought stress-related) in three independent lines (E4, E5 and E6) compared with control (pGVG empty). (C) RNAi-mediated suppression of the genes 15, 16 and 17 (development related; triple silencing) in three independent lines (E7, E8 and E9) compared with control (pGVG empty). Data represent the mean of three biological replicates. Bars indicate the standard error. The expression data refer to the transgene and the correspondent endogenous gene levels. The genes named here are the same as described in Table 1.

Therefore, the combination of adequate plant selectable markers, Gateway technology, and stable and strong promoters in the pGVG vector assures effective transformation and plant regeneration demonstrated by GUS reporter gene expression and qRT-PCR assays. This vector can be used in overexpression and RNAi-mediated silencing of sequences of interest in sugarcane plants that will greatly facilitate the functional characterization of genes. All characteristics incorporated into pGVG certainly will allow it to be used successful in several other monocot species.
  23 in total

Review 1.  Plants as bioreactors for protein production: avoiding the problem of transgene silencing.

Authors:  C De Wilde; H Van Houdt; S De Buck; G Angenon; G De Jaeger; A Depicker
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  Gateway-compatible vectors for high-throughput gene functional analysis in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) and other monocot species.

Authors:  David G J Mann; Peter R Lafayette; Laura L Abercrombie; Zachary R King; Mitra Mazarei; Mathew C Halter; Charleson R Poovaiah; Holly Baxter; Hui Shen; Richard A Dixon; Wayne A Parrott; C Neal Stewart
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 9.803

3.  A comparison of transgenic barley lines produced by particle bombardment and Agrobacterium-mediated techniques.

Authors:  S Travella; S M Ross; J Harden; C Everett; J W Snape; W A Harwood
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 4.570

4.  Isolation of an efficient actin promoter for use in rice transformation.

Authors:  D McElroy; W Zhang; J Cao; R Wu
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  Gateway(®) recombinational cloning: a biological operating system.

Authors:  Federico Katzen
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 6.098

6.  Heat Inducible Expression of a Chimeric Maize hsp70CAT Gene in Maize Protoplasts.

Authors:  J Callis; M Fromm; V Walbot
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  GATEWAY vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation.

Authors:  Mansour Karimi; Dirk Inzé; Ann Depicker
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 18.313

8.  Ubiquitin promoter-based vectors for high-level expression of selectable and/or screenable marker genes in monocotyledonous plants.

Authors:  A H Christensen; P H Quail
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.788

9.  Selection system and co-cultivation medium are important determinants of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sugarcane.

Authors:  Priya Joyce; Melissa Kuwahata; Nicole Turner; Prakash Lakshmanan
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 4.570

10.  Agrobacterium-mediated transformation: rice transformation.

Authors:  Inez H Slamet-Loedin; Prabhjit Chadha-Mohanty; Lina Torrizo
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2014
View more
  1 in total

1.  Reduction of ethylene biosynthesis in sugarcane induces growth and investment in the non-enzymatic antioxidant apparatus.

Authors:  Daniel Neris; Lucia Mattiello; Gustavo Zuñiga; Eduardo Purgatto; Marcelo Menossi
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 4.570

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.