| Literature DB >> 30087720 |
Ljubomir Ognjenovic1, Gjorgji Trajkovski1, Stojan Gjoshev1, Aleksandar Shumkovski1, Darko Dzambaz1, Dragan Hadzi-Manchev1, Goce Volcevski1, Igor Fildishevski2, Dafina Nikolova3, Gordana Petrushevska4, Vesna Janevska4, Vlado Janevski1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: HER2 protein expression in gastric carcinoma, in correlation with existing, acknowledged prognostic factors which include the parameters that determine the TNM stage of the disease, could become the basis for ongoing research in the field of molecular targeted and personalised therapy. AIM: To determine the expression of the HER2 protein in gastric carcinoma and to correlate the expression of a HER2 protein with clinicopathological characteristics of the disease.Entities:
Keywords: HER2 expression; TNM classification; gastric cancer; immunohistochemistry; tumour grade
Year: 2018 PMID: 30087720 PMCID: PMC6062279 DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.280
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Access Maced J Med Sci ISSN: 1857-9655
Figure 1Immunohistochemical HER2 protein expression histological patterns. a) Her2+++ pattern of expression (× 200); b) same pattern of expression at higher magnification (× 400); c) Her2 ++ pattern of expression (x 400); d) Her2 + pattern of expression (x 400)
HER2 protein expression in gastric carcinoma according to the location
| Localization | n | Her2 expression pattern | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| + | ++ | +++ | |||
| Cardia | 61 | 1 (6.25) | 5 (31.25) | 10 (62.50) | 0.005** |
| Corpus | 37 | 6 (54.55) | 0 | 5 (45.45) | |
| Antrum/Pylorus | 51 | 3 (17.65) | 2 (11.76) | 12 (70.59) | |
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.
Distribution of HER and HER negative patients according to the grade of carcinoma differentiation
| Grade | n | Her2 expression | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | Positive | |||
| G1 | 4 | 3 (75) | 1 (25) | 0.034 |
| G2 | 64 | 38 (59.38) | 26 (40.63) | |
| G3 | 81 | 64 (79.01) | 17 (20.99) | |
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.
Figure 2Correlation between the grade of differentiation and HER2 protein expression
Clinical and pathological characteristics of the analysed patients
| Parameter | N (%) |
|---|---|
| Localization | |
| Cardia | 61 (40.94) |
| Corpus | 37 (24.83) |
| Antrum/Pylorus | 51 (34.23) |
| T | |
| 1 | 5 (3.6) |
| 2 | 19 (12.75) |
| 3 | 41 (27.52) |
| 4 | 84 (56.38) |
| Nodal involvement | |
| Negative | 36 (24.16) |
| Positive | 113 (75.84) |
| Nodal status (TNM classification) | |
| 0 | 36 (24.16) |
| 1 | 27 (18.12) |
| 2 | 30 (20.13) |
| 3 | 56 (37.58) |
| Distant metastases | |
| No | 136 (91.27) |
| Yes | 13 (8.72) |
| Grade | |
| 1 | 2.68) |
| 2 | 64 (42.95) |
| 3 | 81 (54.36) |
| Stage | |
| I | 11 (7.38) |
| II | 37 (24.83) |
| III | 88 (59.06) |
| IV | 13 (8.72) |
HER2 expression in analyzed patients
| Variable | N (%) |
|---|---|
| Her2 expression (pattern) | |
| - | 105 (70.47) |
| + | 10 (6.71) |
| ++ | 7 (4.69) |
| +++ | 27 (18.12) |
| Her2 positivity | |
| Negative cases | 105 (70.47) |
| Positive cases | 44 (29.53) |