Literature DB >> 30086364

Distinguishing the precision of spatial recollection from its success: Evidence from healthy aging and unilateral mesial temporal lobe resection.

Aneesha S Nilakantan1, Donna J Bridge2, Stephen VanHaerents3, Joel L Voss4.   

Abstract

Successful episodic recollection can vary in the precision of the information recalled. The hypothesis that recollection precision requires functional neuroanatomical contributions distinct from those required for recollection success remains controversial. Some findings in individuals with hippocampal lesions have indicated that precision is dependent on the hippocampus. However, other neuroimaging and lesion studies have implicated regions outside of the mesial temporal lobe (MTL) in precision, such as parietal cortex. To further elucidate distinctions of recollection precision versus success, we examined whether they were differentially sensitive to aging and to unilateral MTL lesions. Precision and success were measured using a novel task that required memory for item-location associations across different spatial contexts. We found impairments in recollection precision, but not success, in older adults (59-80 years) relative to younger adults (18-33 years). Recollection precision was also selectively impaired in individuals with unilateral MTL resections made to treat refractory epilepsy. Moreover, recollection precision was significantly worse when resections included the hippocampus compared to when only non-hippocampal MTL tissue was resected. These findings suggest that the MTL is critically involved in the high-resolution binding required to support spatial recollection precision, and thus provide evidence for functional neuroanatomical differences between recollection success and precision.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Context; Familiarity; Graded recollection; Memory impairment

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30086364      PMCID: PMC6191347          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.07.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  58 in total

1.  Differential effects of aging on memory for content and context: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  W D Spencer; N Raz
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1995-12

2.  Effects of extensive temporal lobe damage or mild hypoxia on recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  Andrew P Yonelinas; Neal E A Kroll; Joel R Quamme; Michele M Lazzara; Mary-Jane Sauvé; Keith F Widaman; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  Recollection and familiarity: examining controversial assumptions and new directions.

Authors:  Andrew P Yonelinas; Mariam Aly; Wei-Chun Wang; Joshua D Koen
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.899

4.  Disproportionate deficit in associative recognition relative to item recognition in global amnesia.

Authors:  Kelly Sullivan Giovanello; Mieke Verfaellie; Margaret M Keane
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Raquel F G Catalao; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Close but no cigar: Spatial precision deficits following medial temporal lobe lesions provide novel insight into theoretical models of navigation and memory.

Authors:  Branden S Kolarik; Trevor Baer; Kiarash Shahlaie; Andrew P Yonelinas; Arne D Ekstrom
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 7.  Brain atrophy in Alzheimer's Disease and aging.

Authors:  Lorenzo Pini; Michela Pievani; Martina Bocchetta; Daniele Altomare; Paolo Bosco; Enrica Cavedo; Samantha Galluzzi; Moira Marizzoni; Giovanni B Frisoni
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 10.895

8.  Effects of healthy ageing on precision and binding of object location in visual short term memory.

Authors:  Yoni Pertzov; Maike Heider; Yuying Liang; Masud Husain
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2014-12-22

9.  Hippocampus contributes to the maintenance but not the quality of visual information over time.

Authors:  David E Warren; Melissa C Duff; Neal J Cohen; Daniel Tranel
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Spatial Memory Activity Distributions Indicate the Hippocampus Operates in a Continuous Manner.

Authors:  Brittany M Jeye; Jessica M Karanian; Scott D Slotnick
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2016-08-26
View more
  14 in total

1.  Dissociating memory accessibility and precision in forgetting.

Authors:  Sam C Berens; Blake A Richards; Aidan J Horner
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-06-08

2.  The Retrieval-Related Anterior Shift Is Moderated by Age and Correlates with Memory Performance.

Authors:  Sabina Srokova; Paul F Hill; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  Frequency-specific noninvasive modulation of memory retrieval and its relationship with hippocampal network connectivity.

Authors:  Molly S Hermiller; Stephen VanHaerents; Tommi Raij; Joel L Voss
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.899

4.  Testing network properties of episodic memory using non-invasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Melissa Hebscher; Joel L Voss
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2020-02-28

5.  Cortico-hippocampal network connections support the multidimensional quality of episodic memory.

Authors:  Rose A Cooper; Maureen Ritchey
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Compensation of Trial-to-Trial Latency Jitter Reveals the Parietal Retrieval Success Effect to be Both Variable and Thresholded in Older Adults.

Authors:  Jamie G Murray; Guang Ouyang; David I Donaldson
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 5.750

7.  Schematic memories develop quickly, but are not expressed unless necessary.

Authors:  Alexa Tompary; WenXi Zhou; Lila Davachi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Perspective taking and systematic biases in object location memory.

Authors:  Vladislava Segen; Giorgio Colombo; Marios Avraamides; Timothy Slattery; Jan M Wiener
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  The diminishing precision of memory for time.

Authors:  John E Scofield; Jeffrey D Johnson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-08-06

10.  Age-related differences in visual encoding and response strategies contribute to spatial memory deficits.

Authors:  Vladislava Segen; Marios N Avraamides; Timothy J Slattery; Jan M Wiener
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.