Literature DB >> 34357547

The diminishing precision of memory for time.

John E Scofield1, Jeffrey D Johnson2.   

Abstract

Knowing when an event took place can provide several benefits to episodic memory, such as distinguishing among multiple traces, learning sequences of events, and guiding a search strategy. As a tool for understanding memory, time is particularly appealing given its ever-changing quality, the constant possibility to associate it with encoded events, and the ease with which it can be targeted at retrieval. Whereas studies of episodic retrieval typically employ categorical and probabilistic measures of retrieval success, characterizing a continuous feature such as time warrants measures particularly sensitive to the fidelity, or precision, of retrieved information. Here, we adapt a paradigm for assessing the fine-grained precision of retrieval to understand the nature of judging the time at which a memory was encoded. Subjects studied a series of pictures and then undertook a test in which they placed each picture, as precisely as possible, along a continuous time line representing the study list. Based on mixture-modeling analyses of the test response errors, the primary results were that temporal judgments were less accurate with passing time, and this change was due to diminished precision as opposed to an increased rate of guessing. Moreover, although we observed a negligible influence of guessing, subjects exhibited a clear effect of bias that favored recent responses. Together, in contrast to numerous studies of memory for other continuous features (e.g., color and location), our findings demonstrate a novel pattern of decision factors, suggesting that the retrieval of time might highlight distinct attributes of episodic memory.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Episodic memory; Mixture-modeling; Recollection; Retrieval; Temporal memory

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34357547     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-01984-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  31 in total

1.  Fragile associations coexist with robust memories for precise details in long-term memory.

Authors:  Timothy F Lew; Harold E Pashler; Edward Vul
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 2.  A distributed representation of internal time.

Authors:  Marc W Howard; Karthik H Shankar; William R Aue; Amy H Criss
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Neural correlates of confidence during item recognition and source memory retrieval: evidence for both dual-process and strength memory theories.

Authors:  Scott M Hayes; Norbou Buchler; Jared Stokes; James Kragel; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Visual long-term memory has the same limit on fidelity as visual working memory.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; Jonathan Gill; Aude Oliva; George A Alvarez
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-04-29

5.  Judgment of recency under steady-state conditions.

Authors:  J V Hinrichs; H Buschke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-12

6.  Prefrontal and medial temporal lobe activity at encoding predicts temporal context memory.

Authors:  Lucas J Jenkins; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Distinguishing between the success and precision of recollection.

Authors:  Iain M Harlow; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2014-12-13

Review 8.  Memory on time.

Authors:  Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Recollection, familiarity, and cortical reinstatement: a multivoxel pattern analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Johnson; Susan G R McDuff; Michael D Rugg; Kenneth A Norman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 10.  Memory as Perception of the Past: Compressed Time inMind and Brain.

Authors:  Marc W Howard
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.