| Literature DB >> 30085417 |
Zhenyu Wu1,2, Hailiang Zhou3, Fuchang Li1,2,4, Nanbin Zhang1,2, Yanli Zhu1,2,4.
Abstract
This study investigated the influence of dietary fiber levels on the growth performance, digestion, metabolism, and cecal microbial community of rabbits with different diets at different age. The different levels of dietary natural detergent fiber (NDF) were formulated accordingly: 400(A), 350(B), 300(C), 250(D) g/kg original matter basis, respectively; the different ages were 52, 62, and 72 days. With NDF increasing, the average daily feed intake (ADFI) and feed conversion rate (FCR) were increased, whereas average daily gain (ADG) and mortality were decreased (p < 0.05). The stomach relative weight, stomach content relative weight, cecal relative weight, and cecal content weight increased with increasing NDF (p < 0.05). The NH3 -N concentration of cecum dropped when the dietary NDF increased (p < 0.05). The diversity of the total microbiota increased significantly in Diets B, C (p = 0.011), and reached the lowest in 52 days for all diet groups. The richness index was decreased significantly in Diet A, D (p < 0.05) and in 62 days (p < 0.001), respectively. The phylum Firmicutes was higher (p < 0.01) in rabbits fed Diets B, C than Diets A, D and Bacteroidetes was highest in Diets C, D, and Proteobacteria was the highest in Diet A (p < 0.001). Among the classified genera, there were 14 that had levels of abundance of more than 1% and were commonly shared by all samples. Ruminococcus spp. that produced volatile fatty acid (VFA) abundance was highest from Diets B, C at 52 and 62 days. It is interesting to note that Bifidobacterium from Diet C was the most abundant genus during the entire experimental period (p < 0.01). The data from Venn diagrams, principal component analysis (PCA), and heat map plots of the bacterial communities showed that there were more groups of shared microbiota with aging. The above results indicate the cecal microbiota controlled by the 350 g/kg NDF diet can prevent gastrointestinal distress and exhibit good production performance.Entities:
Keywords: Neutral detergent fiber; cecal microbiota; high-throughput sequencing; rabbits
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30085417 PMCID: PMC6528572 DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.708
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiologyopen ISSN: 2045-8827 Impact factor: 3.139
Composition and nutrient levels of experimental diets (as fed basis) %
| Item | Experimental diets | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | |
| Corn | 5.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 | 30.0 |
| Wheat bran | 5.0 | 10.0 | 15.0 | 20.0 |
| Soybean meal | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 |
| Corn germ meal | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Medicago sativa | 16.5 | 16.5 | 16.5 | 16.5 |
| Soybean straw | 12.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| Peanut vine | 39.0 | 30.0 | 21.0 | 11.0 |
| Bentonite | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Salt | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Vitamin‐mineral premix | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Total | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Nutrient levels | ||||
| GE (MJ/kg) | 15.37 | 15.71 | 15.72 | 15.81 |
| Dry matter | 86.72 | 86.29 | 85.49 | 84.39 |
| Crude protein | 16.47 | 16.83 | 16.86 | 16.94 |
| Ether extract (EE) | 2.73 | 2.56 | 2.44 | 2.32 |
| Crude fiber | 22.37 | 18.46 | 14.32 | 10.03 |
| Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) | 41.84 | 37.36 | 31.72 | 25.24 |
| Acid detergent fiber (ADF) | 25.39 | 23.08 | 20.70 | 17.51 |
| Acid detergent lignin (ADL) | 7.88 | 6.90 | 6.10 | 5.19 |
| Ash | 10.28 | 9.35 | 8.20 | 7.30 |
| Ca | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.84 | 0.81 |
| P | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.73 |
Premix provided the following per kg of diets: VA 8000 IU; VD 31,000 IU; VE 50 mg; Lys 1.5 g; Met 1.5 g; Cu 50 mg; Fe 100 mg; Mn 30 mg; Mg 150 mg; I 0.1 mg; Se 0.1 mg.
Nutrient levels were measured values.
Effects of NDF level on growth performance of growing meat rabbits (n = 50)
| Items | Diets |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | ||
| Average daily feed intake (ADFI, g/d) | 156.91 ± 4.88 | 158.66 ± 4.64 | 142.62 ± 3.39 | 138.45 ± 3.24 | 0.022 |
| Average daily gain (ADG, g/d) | 18.53 ± 2.90 | 28.40 ± 2.33 | 32.20 ± 2.20 | 40.76 ± 2.29 | 0.001 |
| Feed conversion rate (FCR) | 8.47 ± 0.26 | 5.59 ± 0.16 | 4.43 ± 0.11 | 3.97 ± 0.21 | <0.001 |
| Mortality (%) | 1.7 ± 0.02 | 1.5 ± 0.05 | 4.8 ± 0.11 | 11.2 ± 0.31 | <0.00 1 |
Different small letter superscripts mean significant difference (p < 0.05).
A,B,C Different capital letter superscripts mean significant difference (p < 0.01); whereas with the same or no letter superscripts mean no significant difference (p > 0.05).
Effects of NDF level on gastrointestinal development of growing meat rabbits (n = 8)
| Items | Diets |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | ||
| Stomach relative weight/% | 6.85 ± 0.40 | 6.17 ± 0.37 | 5.30 ± 0.25 | 5.12 ± 0.15 | 0.012 |
| Stomach content relative weight/% | 4.87 ± 0.37 | 4.38 ± 0.33 | 3.64 ± 0.24 | 3.22 ± 0.11 | 0.031 |
| Small intestine relative length | 3.89 ± 0.28 | 3.81 ± 0.18 | 3.61 ± 0.19 | 3.38 ± 0.23 | 0.853 |
| Cecal relative weight/% | 8.84 ± 0.70 | 7.76 ± 0.33 | 6.93 ± 0.39 | 6.56 ± 0.6 | 0.022 |
| Cecal content relative weight/% | 4.87 ± 0.37 | 4.38 ± 0.33 | 3.64 ± 0.24 | 3.49 ± 0.24 | 0.031 |
Stomach relative weight = Stomach weight/body weight; Stomach content relative weight = Stomach content weight/body weight; Small intestine relative length = Small intestine length/body length; Cecal relative weight = Cecal weight/body weight; Cecal content relative weight = Cecal content weight/body weight.
a,b Different small letter superscripts mean significant difference (p < 0.05), whereas with the same or no letter superscripts mean no significant difference (p > 0.05).
The cecal fermentation character of experimental rabbits (n = 8)
| Items | Diets |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | ||
| Total volatile fatty acid (VFA, mmol/L) | 38.23 ± 3.13 | 41.97 ± 2.73 | 43.76 ± 3.69 | 44.07 ± 2.69 | 0.325 |
| Propionic acid proportion (100%) | 4.14 ± 0.63 | 3.85 ± 1.02 | 5.43 ± 2.02 | 5.32 ± 0.53 | 0.395 |
| Acetic acid proportion (100%) | 80.43 ± 0.88 | 78.98 ± 0.78 | 76.16 ± 0.58 | 74.76 ± 0.59 | 0.069 |
| Butyric acid proportion (100%) | 15.43 ± 1.68 | 16.18 ± 0.98 | 18.41 ± 1.68 | 20.12 ± 0.73 | 0.051 |
| NH3‐N (mmol/L) | 21.22 ± 1.13 | 22.36 ± 0.55 | 23.56 ± 0.48 | 26.18 ± 0.57 | 0.033 |
| pH value | 6.82 ± 0.03 | 6.73 ± 0.04 | 6.56 ± 0.07 | 6.53 ± 0.05 | 0.074 |
a,bDifferent small letter superscripts mean significant difference (p < 0.05), whereas with the same or no letter superscripts mean no significant difference (p > 0.05).
Figure 1Bacterial composition of the different diet treatments at the phylum level. A, B, C, D represented the sequences of cecum from Diet A, B, C, D, respectively. A1, A2, A3, A4, A5……D5 represented five repeat per diet treatment, respectively; S represented sampling time at 52d (S1), 62d (S2), 72d (S3). The same as below
Indexesa of microbial richness and diversity for all samples
| Diet | Age (days) |
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | 52 | 62 | 72 | RMSE | Diet | Age | Diet × Age | |
| Shannon index | 5.44 | 5.67 | 5.56 | 5.28 | 5.13 | 5.71 | 5.63 | 0.33 | 0.011 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| ACE | 15300 | 17890 | 2970 | 3290 | 2016 | 22729 | 4843 | 12409.43 | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Chao 1 | 8561 | 10044 | 2651 | 2672 | 1817 | 12361 | 3769 | 6552.36 | 0.003 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| OTUs | 3134.8 | 3573.9 | 1665.1 | 1564.3 | 1250.1 | 4196.3 | 2007.3 | 2200.33 | 0.030 | <0.001 | 0.005 |
RMSE, Root mean square error; ACE, abundance‐based coverage estimates.
The operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were defined at 3% dissimilarity level. The richness estimators (ACE and Chao1) and diversity indexes (Shannon) were calculated using the Mothur analysis.
a,bDifferent small letter superscripts mean significant difference (p < 0.05);
A,B,C Different capital letter superscripts mean significant difference (p < 0.01); whereas with the same or no letter superscripts mean no significant difference (p > 0.05).
Effect of different diets on Relative abundance of the main bacterial phylaa
| Diet | Age (days) |
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | 52 | 62 | 72 | RMSE | Diet | Age | Diet × Age | |
| Firmicutes | 77.43 | 85.77 | 84.49 | 80.80 | 90.02 | 72.22 | 84.12 | 4.8 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Bacteroidetes | 4.70 | 4.76 | 7.59 | 8.32 | 2.87 | 8.01 | 8.13 | 1.147 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes | 126.89 | 25.62 | 12.04 | 18.09 | 115.57 | 10.1 | 11.31 | 80.35 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Proteobacteria | 10.71 | 2.63 | 1.76 | 4.44 | 1.00 | 11.36 | 2.30 | 2.12 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Actinobacteria | 3.37 | 3.44 | 3.50 | 3.17 | 3.78 | 3.50 | 2.82 | 0.75 | _ | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Relative abundance of a phylum in different libraries was calculated as percentage of the sequence of this phylum to all sequences in that sample.
Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes represented the their percentage of the sequence ratio.
Different capital letter superscripts mean significant difference (p < 0.01); whereas with the same or no letter superscripts mean no significant difference (p > 0.05).
Figure 2The histogram represented occurred at >1% abundance in at least one sample at genus level, and their comparing among four different NDF levels diets in 52, 62, and 72 days
Figure 3Sample sorting analysis
Figure 4Bacterial distribution among all samples
Figure 5Shared OTUs analysis of the different libraries. Venn diagram showing the unique and shared OTUs (3% distance level) among the different libraries in 52 days (I), 62 days (II), and 72 days (III)