Literature DB >> 30085287

Implementing a small media intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening in primary care clinics.

Cathy L Melvin1, Anissa I Vines2, Allison M Deal3, Holly O Pierce1, William R Carpenter4, Paul A Godley5.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers in the USA. In 2017, an estimated 135,420 people were diagnosed with CRC and 50,260 people died from CRC. Several screening modalities are recommended by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), including annual stool tests that are usually completed at home and under-used compared with colonoscopy despite stated patient preferences for an alternative to colonoscopy. The Community Preventive Services Task Force recommends use of small media interventions (SMIs) to increase CRC screening and calls for a greater understanding of its independent impact on screening participation. This study tested whether a SMI increased the likelihood of participant return of a USPSTF recommended Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT). In total, 804 individuals participated in a two-group, prospective randomized controlled trial. Descriptive statistics with chi-square tests compared differences in participant characteristics and return rates. Multivariable log-binomial modeling estimated combined effects of patient characteristics with FIT return rates. No differences in return rates were observed overall or by participant characteristics other than the year of enrollment. A multivariable model controlling for all covariates, found gender, insurance type, and regular place for healthcare to be significantly associated with return rates. Receipt of the SMI did not independently increase overall return rates but it may have improved the ease of completing the FIT by some participants, particularly women, those with insurance, and those with a regular place for healthcare. © Society of Behavioral Medicine 2018. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer screening; Primary care; Screening barrier; Small media intervention

Year:  2019        PMID: 30085287      PMCID: PMC7184871          DOI: 10.1093/tbm/iby063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Behav Med        ISSN: 1613-9860            Impact factor:   3.046


  20 in total

1.  Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care.

Authors:  Alan Nelson
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  Recommendations for client- and provider-directed interventions to increase breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Double bull's eye for post-operative intravenous iron in patient blood management: better outcome and cost-effective.

Authors:  Giancarlo M Liumbruno; Gioia Grazzini
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.443

4.  Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Patient preferences and adherence to colorectal cancer screening in an urban population.

Authors:  Randi L Wolf; Charles E Basch; Corey H Brouse; Celia Shmukler; Steven Shea
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Authors:  Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; David C Grossman; Susan J Curry; Karina W Davidson; John W Epling; Francisco A R García; Matthew W Gillman; Diane M Harper; Alex R Kemper; Alex H Krist; Ann E Kurth; C Seth Landefeld; Carol M Mangione; Douglas K Owens; William R Phillips; Maureen G Phipps; Michael P Pignone; Albert L Siu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Colorectal cancer screening in older men and women: qualitative research findings and implications for intervention.

Authors:  C Beeker; J M Kraft; B G Southwell; C M Jorgensen
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2000-06

8.  Factors influencing choices for colorectal cancer screening among previously unscreened African and Caucasian Americans: findings from a triangulation mixed methods investigation.

Authors:  Mack T Ruffin; John W Creswell; Masahito Jimbo; Michael D Fetters
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2009-04

Review 9.  Applying 'Patient Blood Management' in the trauma center.

Authors:  Oliver M Theusinger; Philipp Stein; Donat R Spahn
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.706

10.  Perspectives on colorectal cancer screening: a focus group study.

Authors:  Vivek Goel; Ross Gray; Pam Chart; Marg Fitch; Fred Saibil; Yola Zdanowicz
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.377

View more
  1 in total

1.  Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening in a peer-counseling intervention study in partnership with African American churches.

Authors:  Annette E Maxwell; Aziza Lucas-Wright; L Cindy Chang; Rhonda E Santifer; Catherine M Crespi
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2020-12-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.