| Literature DB >> 30084093 |
Sophie Langer1, Christine Radtke2, Eva Györi2, Alexander Springer1, Martin L Metzelder3.
Abstract
Bladder augmentation is a demanding surgical procedure and exclusively offered for selected children and has only a small spectrum of indications. Paediatric bladder voiding dysfunction occurs either on a basis of neurological dysfunction caused by congenital neural tube defects or on a basis of rare congenital anatomic malformations. Neurogenic bladder dysfunction often responds well to a combination of specific drugs and/or intermittent self-catheterization. However, selected patients with spinal dysraphism and children with congenital malformations like bladder exstrophy and resulting small bladder capacity might require bladder augmentation. Ileocystoplasty is the preferred method of bladder augmentation to date. Because of the substantial long-and short-term morbidity of augmentation cystoplasty, recent studies have tried to incorporate new techniques and technologies, such as the use of biomaterials to overcome or reduce the adverse effects. In this regard, homografts and allografts have been implemented in bladder augmentation with varying results, but recent studies have shown promising data in terms of proliferation of urothelium and muscle cells by using biological silk grafts.Entities:
Keywords: Biomaterials; Bladder augmentation; Ileocystoplasty; Neurogenic bladder; Urinary bladder dysfunction
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30084093 PMCID: PMC6394595 DOI: 10.1007/s10354-018-0645-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Wien Med Wochenschr ISSN: 0043-5341
Fig. 1Scheme (a) and intraoperative view (b) of Ileocystoplasty. (Painting in a with Courtesy of Stephan Spitzer [http://www.spitzer-illustration.com/], Stephan Spitzer© all rights reserved)
Complication profile in bladder augmentation using gastrointestinal tissue
| Complication | Incidence (%) |
|---|---|
| Bowel obstruction | 3.2–10.3 |
| Bladder calculi | 15–40 |
| Bladder perforation | 2–8.6 |
| Excessive mucous production | −100 |
| Metabolic acidosis, metabolic deterioration | −100 |
| Malignant transformation of bowel/tumour formation | 0.5–10 |
Fascia and muscle grafts in experimental bladder augmentation
| Year | Author | Animal | Graft material | Adverse effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1917 | Neuhof [ | Dogs | Muscle fascia | – |
| 1990 | Weingarten et al. [ | Ferrets | Myoperitoneal pedicle flap | Bladder stones |
| 2001 | Manzoni et al. [ | Rats | Autoaugmentation and muscle flaps | Bladder stones, chronic inflammation |
Demucosalized intestinal tissue in experimental bladder augmentation
| Year | Author | Animal | Graft material | Adverse effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1988 | Oesch et al. [ | Rats | De-epithelialized coecum | Incomplete urothelial coverage |
| 1990 | Motley et al. [ | Calves | Sigmoid | Graft diverticulation, residual intestinal mucosa |
| 1995 | Niku et al. [ | Rabbits | Colon | Postoperative mortality, inflammation |
| 1999 | Clementson Kockum et al. [ | Piglets | De-epithelialized colon | Graft contraction, fibrosis, metaplasia |
| 2011 | Burgu et al. [ | Rats | Ileum, gastric tissue | Metabolic imbalances, bladder stones |
Various types of tissue used in experimental bladder augmentation
| Year | Author | Animal | Graft material | Adverse effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Thangappan et al. [ | Rats | De-epithelialized bladder wall grafts | Chronic inflammation, residual donor cells |
| 2003 | Yamataka et al. [ | Rats | Bladder wall grafts | Two-step procedure and immunosuppressants may be required |
| 1998 | Ikeguchi et al. [ | Pigs | Ureteral tissue | Megaureter required |
| 1998 | Cranidis et al. [ | Rabbits | Human dura mater, de-epithelialized small intestine and gastric tissue | Residual intestinal mucosa, stomach perforation, graft contraction |
| 2004 | Aslan et al. [ | Rat | Pedicled gastric tissue | Bladder stones, metaplasia, postoperative mortality, scarring |
| 2012, 2013 | Dapena et al. [ | Rat | Uterus | Fibrosis |
| 2017 | Barski et al. [ | Rat | Human amniotic membrane | No increase in capacity |
Seeded de-epithelialized intestinal tissue in experimental bladder augmentation
| Year | Author | Animal | Graft material | Adverse effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | Blanco Bruned et al. [ | Rats | Seeded intestinal grafts | No increase in capacity |
| 2005 | Hafez et al. [ | Pigs | Seeded demucosalized colon | No information on results with neuropathic bladder cells |
| 2015 | Hidas et al. [ | Pigs | Seeded demucosalized colon | No information on results with neuropathic bladder cells |
| 2004 | Fraser et al. [ | Minipigs | Seeded de-epithelialized uterine tissue/colon | Incomplete urothelial coverage, graft contraction, fibrosis |
| 2011 | Turner et al. [ | Pigs | De-epithelialized colon, urothelium sheets | Graft shrinkage |
Acellular matrix grafts in experimental bladder augmentation
| Year | Author | Animal | Graft material | Adverse effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | Kropp et al. [ | Rats | SIS | Bladder stones, inflammation, leakage, inflammation, incomplete smooths muscle cell growth |
| 2010 | Parshotam Kumar et al. [ | Sheep | SIS | Fibrosis |
| 2011 | Sharma et al. [ | Primates | Seeded SIS with stem cells | No increase in capacity |
| 2014 | Talab et al. [ | Rabbits | Smooth-muscle cell sheets | Fibrosis, no information on postoperative bladder capacity |
| 2016 | Zhe et al. [ | Rats | ACS-seeded acellular bladder grafts | Bladder stones, insufficient cell growth |
SIS small intestinal submucosa, ACS adipose-derived stem cells
Polymers, collagen grafts, glycosaminoglycans in experimental bladder augmentation
| Year | Author | Animal | Material | Adverse effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | Pattison et al. [ | Rats | Polymer scaffolds | Bladder leak, bladder stones postoperative mortality, slow biodegradation, mechanical difficulties |
| 2008 | Kwon et al. [ | Dogs | Polymer scaffold | Chronic inflammation, rapid scaffold degradation |
| 2010 | Parshotam Kumar et al. [ | Lambs | Collagen scaffolds (INTEGRA® [INTEGRA LIFE SCIENCE CORPORATION, Plainsboro, New Jersey, USA], SURGISIS® [COOK, Spencer, Indiana, USA]) | Fibrosis, graft contraction |
| 2013 | Zhou et al. [ | Rabbits | Acellular bladder matric and growth factors | Bladder stones, graft shrinkage/calcification/scarring, urinary leakage |
| 2016 | Vardar et al. [ | – | Collagen–fibrin scaffold and IGF-1 | Possible outlet obstruction because of tissue hypertrophy |
| 2017 | Leonhäuser et al. [ | Minipigs | Unseeded and seeded collagen scaffolds | Inconsistent cell ingrowth, risk of leakage |
Synthetic materials in experimental bladder augmentation
| Year | Author | Animal | Material | Adverse effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1957 | Kudish [ | Dogs | Polyvinyl sponges | Foreign body reaction |
| 1970 | Kelâmi et al. [ | Dogs | Teflon® (BARD INC., Murray Hill, New Jersey, USA) felt | Fibrosis, incomplete urothelial coverage, no smooth muscle cell growth, graft collapse |
| 1994 | Virseda Chamorro et al. [ | Dogs | Gore-Tex® (W.L. GORE and ASSOCIATES, INC., Flagstaff, Arizona, USA) | No increase in capacity |
Silk scaffolds in experimental bladder augmentation
| Year | Author | Animal | Material | Adverse effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Seth et al. [ | Rat | Silkworm silk scaffold/combined with SIS | Foreign body reaction |
| 2014 | Chung et al. [ | Rat | Silkworm silk fibroin scaffolds combined with SIS | Bladder stones, bladder rupture, chronic inflammation, residual silk |
| 2015 | Zhao et al. [ | Rat | Silkworm silk combined with acellular bladder matrix graft | No increase in capacity |
| 2013 | Tu et al. [ | Pigs | Acellular silkworm silk scaffolds | Urinary leakage, bladder calculi, graft contraction |
SIS small intestinal submucosa